Telecommunications Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LBRDA vs WOW vs CHTR vs CABO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
Telecommunications Services
LBRDA vs WOW vs CHTR vs CABO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services | Telecommunications Services |
| Market Cap | $5.18B | $446M | $19.61B | $354M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $261M | $591M | $54.64B | $1.47B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-2.74B | $-78M | $5.13B | $-260M |
| Gross Margin | 77.8% | 61.0% | 43.3% | 39.0% |
| Operating Margin | 8.8% | 1.2% | 24.1% | 26.0% |
| Forward P/E | 3.1x | — | 3.8x | 2.6x |
| Total Debt | $1.75B | $1.04B | $97.12B | $3.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $57M | $39M | $477M | $153M |
LBRDA vs WOW vs CHTR vs CABO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Broadband C… (LBRDA) | 100 | 26.8 | -73.2% |
| WideOpenWest, Inc. (WOW) | 100 | 79.6 | -20.4% |
| Charter Communicati… (CHTR) | 100 | 28.5 | -71.5% |
| Cable One, Inc. (CABO) | 100 | 3.3 | -96.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LBRDA vs WOW vs CHTR vs CABO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LBRDA is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.29, Low D/E 30.6%, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.29, current ratio 0.10x
- Beta 0.29 vs WOW's 0.89, lower leverage
WOW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.89
- +20.9% vs CABO's -63.9%
CHTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -0.6%, EPS growth 3.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.5%
- -27.5% 10Y total return vs LBRDA's -37.6%
- -0.6% revenue growth vs LBRDA's -100.0%
- 9.4% margin vs LBRDA's -10.5%
CABO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (2.6x vs 3.8x)
- 4.9% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -0.6% revenue growth vs LBRDA's -100.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (2.6x vs 3.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 9.4% margin vs LBRDA's -10.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs WOW's 0.89, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.9% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.9% vs CABO's -63.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 3.3% ROA vs LBRDA's -22.6%, ROIC 8.6% vs -0.3% |
LBRDA vs WOW vs CHTR vs CABO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LBRDA vs WOW vs CHTR vs CABO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WOW leads in 2 of 6 categories
CABO leads 1 • CHTR leads 1 • LBRDA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LBRDA and CHTR and CABO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CHTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $54.6B annually — 209.3x LBRDA's $261M. CHTR is the more profitable business, keeping 9.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LBRDA's -10.5%. On growth, CHTR holds the edge at -1.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $261M | $591M | $54.6B | $1.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$3.7B | $212M | $20.9B | $730M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$2.7B | -$78M | $5.1B | -$260M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $303M | -$68M | $4.0B | -$167M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +77.8% | +61.0% | +43.3% | +39.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.8% | +1.2% | +24.1% | +26.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.5% | -13.2% | +9.4% | -17.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +116.1% | -11.6% | +7.4% | -11.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | -8.9% | -1.0% | -7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -24.6% | -59.3% | +8.9% | +12.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CABO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, CABO's 4.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than WOW's 6.7x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.2B | $446M | $19.6B | $354M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6.9B | $1.4B | $116.3B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.93x | -7.22x | 4.28x | -0.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 3.09x | — | 3.76x | 2.58x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.23x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 6.68x | 5.28x | 4.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.71x | 0.36x | 0.24x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.90x | 2.04x | 1.04x | 0.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 4.44x | 1.27x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CHTR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CHTR delivers a 25.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $25 in annual profit, vs $-53 for WOW. LBRDA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.31x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WOW's 4.98x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CHTR scores 7/9 vs CABO's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -35.5% | -52.7% | +25.2% | -18.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -22.6% | -5.2% | +3.3% | -4.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.3% | +0.4% | +8.6% | +6.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.3% | +0.5% | +9.6% | +7.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.31x | 4.98x | 4.73x | 2.23x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $1.0B | $96.6B | $3.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $57M | $39M | $477M | $153M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.7B | $1.0B | $97.1B | $3.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -28.58x | 0.07x | 2.48x | 3.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
WOW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WOW five years ago would be worth $3,357 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $619 for CABO. Over the past 12 months, WOW leads with a +20.9% total return vs CABO's -63.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors WOW at -14.5% vs CABO's -50.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.7% | — | -26.0% | -40.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -61.0% | +20.9% | -61.7% | -63.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.8% | -37.4% | -55.8% | -87.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -77.6% | -66.4% | -77.7% | -93.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.6% | -68.5% | -27.5% | -69.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -23.2% | -14.5% | -23.8% | -50.0% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LBRDA and WOW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LBRDA is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WOW's 0.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WOW currently trades 99.0% from its 52-week high vs CABO's 34.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.29x | 0.89x | 0.31x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $102.38 | $5.25 | $437.06 | $180.74 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $35.98 | $3.06 | $154.71 | $53.94 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +35.2% | +99.0% | +35.4% | +34.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.5 | 58.7 | 30.9 | 28.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 182K | 573K | 2.3M | 152K |
Analyst Outlook
WOW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LBRDA as "Buy", WOW as "Hold", CHTR as "Buy", CABO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 338.4% upside for LBRDA (target: $158) vs 28.2% for CABO (target: $80). CABO is the only dividend payer here at 4.90% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $158.00 | — | $259.25 | $80.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 15 | 55 | 14 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +4.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $3.06 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.3% | +26.2% | 0.0% |
WOW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). CABO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LBRDA vs WOW vs CHTR vs CABO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LBRDA or WOW or CHTR or CABO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is the stronger pick with -0. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA). Charter Communications, Inc. (CHTR) offers the better valuation at 4. 3x trailing P/E (3. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LBRDA or WOW or CHTR or CABO?
On forward P/E, Cable One, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 2. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LBRDA or WOW or CHTR or CABO?
Over the past 5 years, WideOpenWest, Inc.
(WOW) delivered a total return of -66. 4%, compared to -93. 8% for Cable One, Inc. (CABO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CHTR returned -27. 5% versus CABO's -69. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LBRDA or WOW or CHTR or CABO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
29β versus WideOpenWest, Inc. 's 0. 89β — meaning WOW is approximately 209% more volatile than LBRDA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 31% versus 5% for WideOpenWest, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LBRDA or WOW or CHTR or CABO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is pulling ahead at -0. 6% versus -100. 0% for Liberty Broadband Corporation (LBRDA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: WideOpenWest, Inc. grew EPS 79. 6% year-over-year, compared to -25. 5% for Cable One, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CHTR leads at 0. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LBRDA or WOW or CHTR or CABO?
Charter Communications, Inc.
(CHTR) is the more profitable company, earning 9. 1% net margin versus -1050. 2% for Liberty Broadband Corporation — meaning it keeps 9. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CABO leads at 26. 5% versus 1. 0% for WOW. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LBRDA leads at 77. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LBRDA or WOW or CHTR or CABO more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Cable One, Inc.
(CABO) trades at 2. 6x forward P/E versus 3. 8x for Charter Communications, Inc. — 1. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LBRDA: 338. 4% to $158. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LBRDA or WOW or CHTR or CABO?
In this comparison, CABO (4.
9% yield) pays a dividend. LBRDA, WOW, CHTR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LBRDA or WOW or CHTR or CABO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Cable One, Inc.
(CABO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 4. 9% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CABO: -69. 9%, WOW: -68. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LBRDA and WOW and CHTR and CABO?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LBRDA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WOW is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CHTR is a mid-cap deep-value stock; CABO is a small-cap income-oriented stock. CABO pays a dividend while LBRDA, WOW, CHTR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Gross Margin > 23%
- Dividend Yield > 1.9%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare CHTR vs CMCSA
CMCSA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to CHTR.
Compare LBRDA vs CMCSA
CMCSA is one of the most direct listed alternatives to LBRDA.
Add CMCSA to This Comparison
CMCSA is the strongest missing peer across the current compare set.