LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$4.40B
5Y Perf.+396.0%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisLBRT
SLB
JPM
HAL
BKR
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LBRT vs SLB vs JPM vs HAL vs BKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
SLB
SLB N.V.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$72.19B
5Y Perf.+161.5%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Banks - Diversified
Market Cap$908.57B
5Y Perf.+245.8%
HAL
Halliburton Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$29.17B
5Y Perf.+169.1%
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$57.93B
5Y Perf.+279.5%
LBRT vs SLB vs JPM vs HAL vs BKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  LBRT |  SLB |  JPM |  HAL |  BKR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Banks - Diversified | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $4.40B | $72.19B | $908.57B | $29.17B | $57.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.05B | $35.71B | $280.33B | $22.17B | $27.89B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $150M | $3.35B | $57.05B | $1.54B | $3.12B |
| Gross Margin | 10.7% | 18.2% | 60.0% | 15.3% | 23.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.5% | 15.3% | 25.9% | 11.3% | 25.3% |
| Forward P/E | 101.9x | 18.6x | 14.6x | 14.8x | 24.5x |
| Total Debt | $873M | $12.31B | $942.38B | $8.13B | $7.14B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $28M | $3.04B | $343.34B | $2.21B | $3.71B |
LBRT vs SLB vs JPM vs HAL vs BKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LBRT
SLB
JPM
HAL
BKR
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) | 100 | 496.0 | +396.0% |
| SLB N.V. (SLB) | 100 | 261.5 | +161.5% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 345.8 | +245.8% |
| Halliburton Company (HAL) | 100 | 269.1 | +169.1% |
| Baker Hughes Company (BKR) | 100 | 379.5 | +279.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LBRT vs SLB vs JPM vs HAL vs BKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: JPM leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Liberty Energy Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. SLB, HAL, and BKR also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇JPM emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.
The Momentum Pick
LBRT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +109.7% vs JPM's +20.9%
Best for: momentum
SLB
SLB N.V.
The Income Pick
SLB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 4 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.2%
- 2.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8%
Best for: income & stability
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick
JPM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 481.2% 10Y total return vs BKR's 160.2%
- 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs LBRT's -7.2%
- Lower P/E (14.6x vs 24.5x)
- 20.4% margin vs LBRT's 3.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
HAL
Halliburton Company
The Defensive Pick
HAL is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.39, Low D/E 77.4%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.39, yield 2.0%, current ratio 2.04x
- Beta 0.39 vs LBRT's 1.22
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
BKR
Baker Hughes Company
The Growth Play
BKR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth -0.3%, EPS growth -12.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.4%
- 7.3% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 12.7% vs 4.5%
Best for: growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  JPM | 3.3% NII/revenue growth vs LBRT's -7.2% |
| Value | JPM | Lower P/E (14.6x vs 24.5x) |
| Quality / Margins | JPM | 20.4% margin vs LBRT's 3.7% |
| Stability / Safety |  HAL | Beta 0.39 vs LBRT's 1.22 |
| Dividends |  SLB | 2.2% yield, 4-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) |  LBRT | +109.7% vs JPM's +20.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) |  BKR | 7.3% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 12.7% vs 4.5% |
LBRT vs SLB vs JPM vs HAL vs BKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
LBRT vs SLB vs JPM vs HAL vs BKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLJPMLAGGINGHAL
Who Leads Where
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories
BKR leads 1 • LBRT leads 0 • SLB leads 0 • HAL leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓HALHalliburton Company
0leads
SLBSLB N.V.
0leads
LBRTLiberty Energy Inc.
0leads
BKRBaker Hughes Company
1leads
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs BKRvs LBRTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
JPM4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
BKR6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
JPM3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 69.2x LBRT's $4.0B. JPM is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LBRT's 3.7%. On growth, SLB holds the edge at +5.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LBRTLiberty Energy In… | SLBSLB N.V. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.0B | $35.7B | $280.3B | $22.2B | $27.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $549M | $7.4B | $81.4B | $3.4B | $4.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $150M | $3.4B | $57.0B | $1.5B | $3.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$193M | $4.8B | $100.9B | $1.7B | $2.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.7% | +18.2% | +60.0% | +15.3% | +23.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.5% | +15.3% | +25.9% | +11.3% | +25.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.7% | +9.4% | +20.4% | +6.9% | +11.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.8% | +13.4% | +36.0% | +7.6% | +9.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +4.5% | +5.0% | — | -0.3% | +2.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | -31.2% | +16.0% | +129.2% | +132.5% |
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LBRT and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.2x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 47% valuation discount to LBRT's 30.5x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LBRT's 9.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.5x.
| Metric | LBRTLiberty Energy In… | SLBSLB N.V. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.4B | $72.2B | $908.6B | $29.2B | $57.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $5.3B | $81.5B | $1.51T | $35.1B | $61.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 30.54x | 20.46x | 16.22x | 23.29x | 22.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 101.87x | 18.57x | 14.60x | 14.82x | 24.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.92x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.03x | 11.06x | 18.52x | 10.34x | 12.93x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.10x | 2.02x | 3.25x | 1.31x | 2.09x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.17x | 2.62x | 2.51x | 2.79x | 3.05x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 312.27x | 15.06x | 9.01x | 17.45x | 22.83x |
Evenly matched — LBRT and JPM each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BKR delivers a 16.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for LBRT. BKR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BKR scores 6/9 vs SLB's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LBRTLiberty Energy In… | SLBSLB N.V. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.4% | +13.9% | +15.9% | +14.6% | +16.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.0% | +6.5% | +1.3% | +6.1% | +7.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.3% | +12.1% | +4.5% | +10.2% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +14.3% | +8.9% | +11.6% | +13.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.42x | 0.45x | 2.60x | 0.77x | 0.38x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $846M | $9.3B | $599.0B | $5.9B | $3.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $28M | $3.0B | $343.3B | $2.2B | $3.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $873M | $12.3B | $942.4B | $8.1B | $7.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 5.24x | 9.40x | 0.74x | 9.19x | 9.68x |
BKR leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BKR five years ago would be worth $27,569 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,881 for SLB. Over the past 12 months, LBRT leads with a +109.7% total return vs JPM's +20.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 33.7% vs SLB's 2.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LBRTLiberty Energy In… | SLBSLB N.V. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +44.9% | +21.1% | +0.8% | +19.2% | +24.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +109.7% | +37.4% | +20.9% | +59.8% | +52.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.6% | +8.8% | +138.8% | +17.4% | +104.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +99.8% | +68.8% | +135.5% | +72.1% | +175.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.2% | -21.5% | +481.2% | -6.9% | +160.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.2% | +2.9% | +33.7% | +5.5% | +27.0% |
JPM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — JPM and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
HAL is the less volatile stock with a 0.39 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LBRT's 1.22 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JPM currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs LBRT's 78.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LBRTLiberty Energy In… | SLBSLB N.V. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.22x | 0.81x | 0.87x | 0.39x | 0.84x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.48 | $58.82 | $338.09 | $43.59 | $70.41 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.90 | $31.64 | $269.72 | $20.09 | $37.38 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +78.8% | +81.8% | +96.2% | +80.1% | +83.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.1 | 33.3 | 72.1 | 32.5 | 37.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.2M | 12.6M | 7.4M | 10.5M | 7.4M |
Evenly matched — JPM and HAL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — SLB and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LBRT as "Buy", SLB as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", HAL as "Buy", BKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.7% upside for LBRT (target: $35) vs 4.5% for JPM (target: $340). For income investors, SLB offers the higher dividend yield at 2.24% vs LBRT's 1.21%.
| Metric | LBRTLiberty Energy In… | SLBSLB N.V. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … | HALHalliburton Compa… | BKRBaker Hughes Comp… |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $34.71 | $60.46 | $339.75 | $39.64 | $73.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 19 | 66 | 61 | 64 | 45 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.2% | +2.2% | +1.8% | +2.0% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 4 | 15 | 0 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.33 | $1.08 | $5.95 | $0.69 | $0.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.6% | +3.3% | +3.8% | +3.5% | +0.7% |
Evenly matched — SLB and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
JPM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). BKR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
Best OverallJPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LBRT vs SLB vs JPM vs HAL vs BKR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LBRT or SLB or JPM or HAL or BKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the stronger pick with 3. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 2% for Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 16. 2x trailing P/E (14. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LBRT or SLB or JPM or HAL or BKR?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 16. 2x versus Liberty Energy Inc. at 30. 5x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 6x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LBRT or SLB or JPM or HAL or BKR?
Over the past 5 years, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) delivered a total return of +175.
7%, compared to +68. 8% for SLB N. V. (SLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +481. 2% versus SLB's -21. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LBRT or SLB or JPM or HAL or BKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Halliburton Company (HAL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
39β versus Liberty Energy Inc. 's 1. 22β — meaning LBRT is approximately 216% more volatile than HAL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Baker Hughes Company (BKR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LBRT or SLB or JPM or HAL or BKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is pulling ahead at 3. 3% versus -7. 2% for Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: JPMorgan Chase & Co. grew EPS 1. 5% year-over-year, compared to -52. 4% for Liberty Energy Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BKR leads at 9. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LBRT or SLB or JPM or HAL or BKR?
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the more profitable company, earning 20. 4% net margin versus 3. 7% for Liberty Energy Inc. — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JPM leads at 26. 0% versus 2. 0% for LBRT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JPM leads at 59. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LBRT or SLB or JPM or HAL or BKR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 6x forward P/E versus 101. 9x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 87. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LBRT: 27. 7% to $34. 71.
08Which pays a better dividend — LBRT or SLB or JPM or HAL or BKR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
SLB N. V. (SLB) offers the highest yield at 2. 2%, versus 1. 2% for Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT).
09Is LBRT or SLB or JPM or HAL or BKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Halliburton Company (HAL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
39), 2. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (HAL: -6. 9%, LBRT: +68. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LBRT and SLB and JPM and HAL and BKR?
These companies operate in different sectors (LBRT (Energy) and SLB (Energy) and JPM (Financial Services) and HAL (Energy) and BKR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LBRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; HAL is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; BKR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.