LCFY
Locafy Limited
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$7M
5Y Perf.-40.0%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LCFY vs LSE vs YELP vs CHNR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LSE
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$84M
5Y Perf.+2.1%
YELP
Yelp Inc.
Internet Content & Information
Market Cap$1.69B
5Y Perf.-26.4%
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
Waste Management
Market Cap$42M
5Y Perf.-20.7%
LCFY vs LSE vs YELP vs CHNR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LCFY | LSE | YELP | CHNR |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Internet Content & Information | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services | Internet Content & Information | Waste Management |
| Market Cap | $7M | $84M | $1.69B | $42M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4M | $141M | $1.47B | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-3M | $15M | $139M | $-14M |
| Gross Margin | 100.0% | 23.1% | 90.0% | — |
| Operating Margin | -65.3% | 9.2% | 12.4% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.3x | 13.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $631K | $2M | $42M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $595K | $6M | $216M | $3M |
LCFY vs LSE vs YELP vs CHNR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LCFY
LSE
YELP
CHNR
| Stock | Dec 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Locafy Limited (LCFY) | 100 | 60.0 | -40.0% |
| Leishen Energy Hold… (LSE) | 100 | 102.1 | +2.1% |
| Yelp Inc. (YELP) | 100 | 73.6 | -26.4% |
| China Natural Resou… (CHNR) | 100 | 79.3 | -20.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LCFY vs LSE vs YELP vs CHNR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LSE leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Yelp Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion. CHNR also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LCFY
Locafy Limited
The Secondary Option
LCFY lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Best for: communication services exposure
LSE
Leishen Energy Holding Co., Ltd.
The Income Pick
LSE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.42
- Lower volatility, beta 0.42, Low D/E 4.6%, current ratio 2.28x
- Beta 0.42, current ratio 2.28x
- Better valuation composite
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
YELP
Yelp Inc.
The Growth Play
YELP is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.7%, EPS growth 19.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.1%
- 10.2% 10Y total return vs LSE's -0.6%
- 3.7% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
CHNR
China Natural Resources, Inc.
The Momentum Pick
CHNR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- -2.3% vs YELP's -19.9%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | YELP | 3.7% revenue growth vs CHNR's -100.0% |
| Value | LSE | Better valuation composite |
| Quality / Margins | LSE | 10.6% margin vs LCFY's -71.8% |
| Stability / Safety | LSE | Beta 0.42 vs LCFY's 2.08, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CHNR | -2.3% vs YELP's -19.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LSE | 20.7% ROA vs LCFY's -44.8%, ROIC 17.3% vs -82.7% |
LCFY vs LSE vs YELP vs CHNR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
Segment breakdown not available.
LCFY vs LSE vs YELP vs CHNR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLYELPLAGGINGCHNR
Who Leads Where
YELP leads in 3 of 6 categories
LSE leads 1 • LCFY leads 0 • CHNR leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓CHNRChina Natural Resourc…
0leads
LCFYLocafy Limited
0leads
LSELeishen Energy Holdin…
1leads
YELPYelp Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LSEvs LCFYMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
YELP3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
YELP3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LSE5/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
YELP3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YELP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
YELP and CHNR operate at a comparable scale, with $1.5B and $0 in trailing revenue. LSE is the more profitable business, keeping 10.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LCFY's -71.8%. On growth, YELP holds the edge at +0.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LCFYLocafy Limited | LSELeishen Energy Ho… | YELPYelp Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4M | $141M | $1.5B | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$690,177 | $14M | $236M | -$12M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$3M | $15M | $139M | -$14M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$2M | $18M | $281M | -$6M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +100.0% | +23.1% | +90.0% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -65.3% | +9.2% | +12.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -71.8% | +10.6% | +9.5% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -56.1% | +13.1% | +19.1% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -31.2% | -29.3% | +0.8% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +30.3% | -112.3% | -16.7% | +91.3% |
YELP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
YELP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.3x trailing earnings, LSE trades at a 19% valuation discount to YELP's 12.7x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, YELP's 6.2x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LSE's 9.9x.
| Metric | LCFYLocafy Limited | LSELeishen Energy Ho… | YELPYelp Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7M | $84M | $1.7B | $42M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7M | $80M | $1.5B | $41M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.37x | 10.31x | 12.71x | -88.68x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 13.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 9.86x | 6.18x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.19x | 1.21x | 1.15x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.67x | 2.06x | 2.61x | 3.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 5.82x | 5.23x | — |
YELP leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LSE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LSE delivers a 34.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-68 for LCFY. LSE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LCFY's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LSE scores 6/9 vs CHNR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LCFYLocafy Limited | LSELeishen Energy Ho… | YELPYelp Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -68.2% | +34.6% | +19.7% | -15.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -44.8% | +20.7% | +14.1% | -5.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -82.7% | +17.3% | +25.1% | -0.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -107.5% | +19.8% | +22.9% | -0.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 | 6 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.05x | 0.06x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $36,519 | -$4M | -$174M | -$3M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $594,671 | $6M | $216M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $631,190 | $2M | $42M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -14.67x | 135.62x | — | -263.29x |
LSE leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
YELP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LSE five years ago would be worth $9,940 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $617 for LCFY. Over the past 12 months, CHNR leads with a -2.3% total return vs YELP's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors YELP at 0.5% vs CHNR's -41.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LCFYLocafy Limited | LSELeishen Energy Ho… | YELPYelp Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +40.6% | +15.9% | -5.7% | +22.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.6% | -9.7% | -19.9% | -2.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -47.0% | -0.6% | +1.6% | -79.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | -0.6% | -27.9% | -92.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.8% | -0.6% | +10.2% | -93.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.1% | -0.2% | +0.5% | -41.2% |
YELP leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LSE and YELP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LSE is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LCFY's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. YELP currently trades 69.1% from its 52-week high vs LCFY's 29.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LCFYLocafy Limited | LSELeishen Energy Ho… | YELPYelp Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.08x | 0.42x | 0.82x | 1.12x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $13.98 | $9.78 | $41.22 | $8.20 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.50 | $3.80 | $19.60 | $3.16 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +29.5% | +50.6% | +69.1% | +52.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.5 | 49.0 | 57.2 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 12K | 19K | 1.1M | 893K |
Evenly matched — LSE and YELP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | LCFYLocafy Limited | LSELeishen Energy Ho… | YELPYelp Inc. | CHNRChina Natural Res… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Hold | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $28.33 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 67 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +17.3% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
YELP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LSE leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
Best OverallYelp Inc. (YELP)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LCFY vs LSE vs YELP vs CHNR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LCFY or LSE or YELP or CHNR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is the stronger pick with 3. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 8% for Locafy Limited (LCFY). Leishen Energy Holding Co. , Ltd. (LSE) offers the better valuation at 10. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Yelp Inc. (YELP) a "Hold" — based on 67 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LCFY or LSE or YELP or CHNR?
On trailing P/E, Leishen Energy Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LSE) is the cheapest at 10. 3x versus Yelp Inc. at 12. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LCFY or LSE or YELP or CHNR?
Over the past 5 years, Leishen Energy Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LSE) delivered a total return of -0. 6%, compared to -93. 8% for Locafy Limited (LCFY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: YELP returned +10. 2% versus LCFY's -93. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LCFY or LSE or YELP or CHNR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Leishen Energy Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LSE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Locafy Limited's 2. 08β — meaning LCFY is approximately 393% more volatile than LSE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Leishen Energy Holding Co. , Ltd. (LSE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 16% for Locafy Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LCFY or LSE or YELP or CHNR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Yelp Inc.
(YELP) is pulling ahead at 3. 7% versus -22. 8% for Locafy Limited (LCFY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: China Natural Resources, Inc. grew EPS 95. 9% year-over-year, compared to -31. 4% for Leishen Energy Holding Co. , Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LSE leads at 30. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LCFY or LSE or YELP or CHNR?
Leishen Energy Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LSE) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 7% net margin versus -134. 7% for Locafy Limited — meaning it keeps 11. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: YELP leads at 12. 6% versus -129. 2% for LCFY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LCFY leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — LCFY or LSE or YELP or CHNR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is LCFY or LSE or YELP or CHNR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Leishen Energy Holding Co.
, Ltd. (LSE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42)). Locafy Limited (LCFY) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LSE: -0. 6%, LCFY: -93. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LCFY and LSE and YELP and CHNR?
These companies operate in different sectors (LCFY (Communication Services) and LSE (Energy) and YELP (Communication Services) and CHNR (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LCFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; LSE is a small-cap deep-value stock; YELP is a small-cap deep-value stock; CHNR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(LCFY: -31.2% · LSE: -29.3%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.