Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LCTX vs NTLA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LCTX vs NTLA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $333M | $1.62B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $68M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-64M | $-413M |
| Gross Margin | 99.0% | -25.6% |
| Operating Margin | -251.6% | -6.5% |
| Total Debt | $2M | $93M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $41M | $155M |
LCTX vs NTLA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lineage Cell Therap… (LCTX) | 100 | 155.4 | +55.4% |
| Intellia Therapeuti… (NTLA) | 100 | 78.3 | -21.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LCTX vs NTLA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LCTX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.53
- Rev growth 53.2%, EPS growth -201.1%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.53, Low D/E 5.6%, current ratio 5.20x
NTLA is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- -42.9% 10Y total return vs LCTX's -51.2%
- -45.2% ROA vs LCTX's -62.8%, ROIC -44.0% vs -141.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 53.2% revenue growth vs NTLA's 16.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -436.5% margin vs NTLA's -6.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.53 vs NTLA's 2.37, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +208.6% vs NTLA's +88.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -45.2% ROA vs LCTX's -62.8%, ROIC -44.0% vs -141.9% |
LCTX vs NTLA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LCTX vs NTLA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LCTX leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NTLA is the larger business by revenue, generating $68M annually — 4.6x LCTX's $15M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -4.4% (LCTX) to -6.1% (NTLA). On growth, LCTX holds the edge at +130.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $68M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$36M | -$431M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$64M | -$413M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$396M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +99.0% | -25.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.5% | -6.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.4% | -6.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -131.6% | -5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +130.4% | +78.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | +34.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LCTX leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $333M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $295M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.89x | -3.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 22.88x | 23.93x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.27x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
NTLA leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NTLA delivers a -56.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-57 in annual profit, vs $-135 for LCTX. LCTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NTLA's 0.14x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -134.5% | -56.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -62.8% | -45.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -141.9% | -44.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -36.5% | -48.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.06x | 0.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | -$62M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $41M | $155M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $93M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LCTX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LCTX five years ago would be worth $5,000 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,024 for NTLA. Over the past 12 months, LCTX leads with a +208.6% total return vs NTLA's +88.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LCTX at -2.8% vs NTLA's -31.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -16.5% | +48.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +208.6% | +88.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -8.1% | -68.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.0% | -79.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -51.2% | -42.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.8% | -31.8% |
Risk & Volatility
LCTX leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LCTX is the less volatile stock with a 1.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NTLA's 2.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LCTX currently trades 65.6% from its 52-week high vs NTLA's 48.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.53x | 2.37x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.09 | $28.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.42 | $6.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +65.6% | +48.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 39.4 | 50.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LCTX as "Buy" and NTLA as "Buy".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $20.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 39 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LCTX leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). NTLA leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency).
LCTX vs NTLA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LCTX or NTLA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.
(LCTX) is the stronger pick with 53. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 16. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). Analysts rate Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (LCTX) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LCTX or NTLA?
Over the past 5 years, Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.
(LCTX) delivered a total return of -50. 0%, compared to -79. 8% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NTLA returned -42. 9% versus LCTX's -51. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LCTX or NTLA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.
(LCTX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 53β versus Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. 's 2. 37β — meaning NTLA is approximately 55% more volatile than LCTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc. (LCTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 14% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LCTX or NTLA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.
(LCTX) is pulling ahead at 53. 2% versus 16. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 27. 4% year-over-year, compared to -201. 1% for Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, NTLA leads at 9. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LCTX or NTLA?
Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.
(LCTX) is the more profitable company, earning -436. 5% net margin versus -609. 9% for Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. — meaning it keeps -436. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LCTX leads at -251. 6% versus -651. 7% for NTLA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LCTX leads at 99. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LCTX or NTLA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LCTX or NTLA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lineage Cell Therapeutics, Inc.
(LCTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Intellia Therapeutics, Inc. (NTLA) carries a higher beta of 2. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LCTX: -51. 2%, NTLA: -42. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LCTX and NTLA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.