Residential Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LEGH vs SKY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Residential Construction
LEGH vs SKY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Residential Construction | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $515M | $4.20B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $180M | $2.64B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $48M | $214M |
| Gross Margin | 44.5% | 26.3% |
| Operating Margin | 29.7% | 9.8% |
| Forward P/E | 10.6x | 20.1x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $131M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $8M | $610M |
LEGH vs SKY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legacy Housing Corp… (LEGH) | 100 | 165.9 | +65.9% |
| Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) | 100 | 305.6 | +205.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LEGH vs SKY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LEGH has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.80
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 3.51x
- Beta 0.80, current ratio 3.51x
SKY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 22.7%, EPS growth 35.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 4.0%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs LEGH's 79.5%
- 22.7% revenue growth vs LEGH's -10.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 22.7% revenue growth vs LEGH's -10.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 20.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.7% margin vs SKY's 8.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs SKY's 0.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -12.1% vs LEGH's -13.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 10.1% ROA vs LEGH's 8.8%, ROIC 16.9% vs 7.1% |
LEGH vs SKY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LEGH vs SKY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEGH leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SKY is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.6B annually — 14.6x LEGH's $180M. LEGH is the more profitable business, keeping 26.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SKY's 8.1%. On growth, SKY holds the edge at +1.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $180M | $2.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $55M | $306M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $48M | $214M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $260M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.5% | +26.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +29.7% | +9.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.7% | +8.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.2% | +9.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -8.6% | +1.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -45.3% | -3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LEGH leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LEGH's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SKY's 13.2x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $515M | $4.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $509M | $3.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | — | 22.20x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.64x | 20.14x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.81x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.52x | 13.20x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.13x | 1.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.97x | 2.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 18.31x | 22.06x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SKY leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SKY delivers a 13.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $13 in annual profit, vs $9 for LEGH. LEGH carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SKY's 0.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SKY scores 7/9 vs LEGH's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.5% | +13.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +8.8% | +10.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.1% | +16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.4% | +14.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | -$479M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $8M | $610M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $131M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1184.32x | 51.32x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SKY leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SKY five years ago would be worth $17,393 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,689 for LEGH. Over the past 12 months, SKY leads with a -12.1% total return vs LEGH's -13.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SKY at 0.3% vs LEGH's -1.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +11.9% | -10.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.3% | -12.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -5.3% | +0.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +16.9% | +73.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +79.5% | +739.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -1.8% | +0.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LEGH and SKY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEGH is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SKY's 0.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SKY currently trades 76.6% from its 52-week high vs LEGH's 73.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.96x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.45 | $99.17 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $18.34 | $59.44 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +73.3% | +76.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.9 | 38.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 106K | 501K |
Analyst Outlook
LEGH leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LEGH as "Buy" and SKY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 39.6% upside for SKY (target: $106) vs 36.6% for LEGH (target: $30).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $29.50 | $106.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | 8 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.5% | +1.9% |
LEGH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). SKY leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
LEGH vs SKY: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LEGH or SKY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger pick with 22. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -10. 7% for Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH). Champion Homes, Inc. (SKY) offers the better valuation at 22. 2x trailing P/E (20. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LEGH or SKY?
On forward P/E, Legacy Housing Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.
6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LEGH or SKY?
Over the past 5 years, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) delivered a total return of +73. 9%, compared to +16. 9% for Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SKY returned +739. 7% versus LEGH's +79. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LEGH or SKY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
80β versus Champion Homes, Inc. 's 0. 96β — meaning SKY is approximately 20% more volatile than LEGH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 8% for Champion Homes, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LEGH or SKY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is pulling ahead at 22. 7% versus -10. 7% for Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Champion Homes, Inc. grew EPS 35. 2% year-over-year, compared to -100. 0% for Legacy Housing Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, SKY leads at 4. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LEGH or SKY?
Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) is the more profitable company, earning 25.
4% net margin versus 8. 0% for Champion Homes, Inc. — meaning it keeps 25. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LEGH leads at 29. 4% versus 9. 5% for SKY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LEGH leads at 48. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LEGH or SKY more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Legacy Housing Corporation (LEGH) trades at 10.
6x forward P/E versus 20. 1x for Champion Homes, Inc. — 9. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for SKY: 39. 6% to $106. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LEGH or SKY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LEGH or SKY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Champion Homes, Inc.
(SKY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 96), +739. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (SKY: +739. 7%, LEGH: +79. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LEGH and SKY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LEGH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SKY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.