Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LEXX vs CYBN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
LEXX vs CYBN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $14M | $304M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $522K | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-11M | $-123M |
| Gross Margin | 84.9% | — |
| Operating Margin | -20.2% | — |
| Total Debt | $109K | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $2M | $135M |
LEXX vs CYBN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jan 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lexaria Bioscience … (LEXX) | 100 | 13.8 | -86.2% |
| Cybin Inc. (CYBN) | 100 | 10.6 | -89.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LEXX vs CYBN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LEXX is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.00
- -85.7% 10Y total return vs CYBN's -99.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.00, Low D/E 4.2%, current ratio 2.32x
CYBN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- EPS growth 93.5%
- 3.2% margin vs LEXX's -20.7%
- -1.9% vs LEXX's -38.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 52.0% revenue growth vs CYBN's -57.3% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs LEXX's -20.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs CYBN's 1.52 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -1.9% vs LEXX's -38.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -58.3% ROA vs LEXX's -178.4%, ROIC -115.8% vs -7.9% |
LEXX vs CYBN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LEXX vs CYBN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEXX leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LEXX and CYBN operate at a comparable scale, with $522,000 and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $522,000 | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$10M | -$147M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$11M | -$123M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$106M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.9% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -20.2% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -20.7% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -16.7% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -100.0% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.4% | -8.2% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LEXX and CYBN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $304M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13M | $205M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.97x | -13.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 20.17x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.43x | 6.52x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
CYBN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CYBN delivers a -81.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-81 in annual profit, vs $-2 for LEXX.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.4% | -81.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -178.4% | -58.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -7.9% | -115.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.2% | -54.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$2M | -$135M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $2M | $135M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $109,320 | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LEXX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LEXX five years ago would be worth $1,023 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $968 for CYBN. Over the past 12 months, CYBN leads with a -1.9% total return vs LEXX's -38.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LEXX at -14.4% vs CYBN's -20.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -2.0% | -26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.4% | -1.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -37.2% | -49.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.8% | -90.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.7% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -14.4% | -20.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LEXX and CYBN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LEXX is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CYBN's 1.52 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CYBN currently trades 62.0% from its 52-week high vs LEXX's 41.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.00x | 1.52x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.55 | $9.83 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.46 | $5.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +41.3% | +62.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 36.1 | 35.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 180K | 292K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LEXX leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). CYBN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LEXX vs CYBN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LEXX or CYBN a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Cybin Inc.
(CYBN) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LEXX or CYBN?
Over the past 5 years, Lexaria Bioscience Corp.
(LEXX) delivered a total return of -89. 8%, compared to -90. 3% for Cybin Inc. (CYBN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LEXX returned -85. 7% versus CYBN's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LEXX or CYBN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lexaria Bioscience Corp.
(LEXX) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus Cybin Inc. 's 1. 52β — meaning CYBN is approximately 52% more volatile than LEXX relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LEXX or CYBN?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Cybin Inc.
grew EPS 93. 5% year-over-year, compared to -40. 4% for Lexaria Bioscience Corp.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LEXX or CYBN?
Cybin Inc.
(CYBN) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -1686. 0% for Lexaria Bioscience Corp. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CYBN leads at 0. 0% versus -1648. 0% for LEXX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LEXX leads at 83. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LEXX or CYBN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LEXX or CYBN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lexaria Bioscience Corp.
(LEXX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00)). Cybin Inc. (CYBN) carries a higher beta of 1. 52 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LEXX: -85. 7%, CYBN: -99. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LEXX and CYBN?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LEXX is a small-cap high-growth stock; CYBN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.