Education & Training Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
LGCY vs LOPE vs PRDO vs STRA vs LAUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
Education & Training Services
LGCY vs LOPE vs PRDO vs STRA vs LAUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $139M | $4.00B | $2.13B | $1.76B | $5.25B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $78M | $817M | $855M | $1.27B | $1.74B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $8M | $220M | $170M | $130M | $280M |
| Gross Margin | 46.7% | 51.6% | 71.1% | 37.4% | 26.9% |
| Operating Margin | 14.4% | 38.0% | 24.3% | 14.0% | 24.0% |
| Forward P/E | 16.4x | 14.6x | 11.7x | 10.6x | 17.1x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $200M | $105M | $109M | $847M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $112M | $132M | $141M | $147M |
LGCY vs LOPE vs PRDO vs STRA vs LAUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 24 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Legacy Education In… (LGCY) | 100 | 239.3 | +139.3% |
| Grand Canyon Educat… (LOPE) | 100 | 104.0 | +4.0% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 153.1 | +53.1% |
| Strategic Education… (STRA) | 100 | 83.6 | -16.4% |
| Laureate Education,… (LAUR) | 100 | 221.3 | +121.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGCY vs LOPE vs PRDO vs STRA vs LAUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGCY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 39.5%, EPS growth 34.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.9%
- 39.5% revenue growth vs STRA's 4.0%
LOPE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.23, Low D/E 26.8%, current ratio 3.65x
- 26.9% margin vs STRA's 10.2%
- Beta 0.23 vs LGCY's 1.44, lower leverage
- 21.9% ROA vs STRA's 6.2%, ROIC 32.5% vs 9.0%
PRDO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.28, yield 1.6%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs LAUR's 251.4%
- Beta 0.28, yield 1.6%, current ratio 5.06x
- 1.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs STRA's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
STRA is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 1.41 vs LOPE's 2.03
- Lower P/E (10.6x vs 17.1x)
LAUR is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +66.7% vs LOPE's -19.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.5% revenue growth vs STRA's 4.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.6x vs 17.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 26.9% margin vs STRA's 10.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.23 vs LGCY's 1.44, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs STRA's 3.3%, (3 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.7% vs LOPE's -19.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 21.9% ROA vs STRA's 6.2%, ROIC 32.5% vs 9.0% |
LGCY vs LOPE vs PRDO vs STRA vs LAUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LGCY vs LOPE vs PRDO vs STRA vs LAUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LOPE leads in 2 of 6 categories
STRA leads 1 • LAUR leads 1 • LGCY leads 0 • PRDO leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LOPE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LAUR is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.7B annually — 22.3x LGCY's $78M. LOPE is the more profitable business, keeping 26.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to STRA's 10.2%. On growth, LAUR holds the edge at +15.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $78M | $817M | $855M | $1.3B | $1.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $12M | $341M | $247M | $216M | $535M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $8M | $220M | $170M | $130M | $280M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $5M | $260M | $221M | $174M | $264M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.7% | +51.6% | +71.1% | +37.4% | +26.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +14.4% | +38.0% | +24.3% | +14.0% | +24.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +10.9% | +26.9% | +19.9% | +10.2% | +16.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.1% | +31.8% | +25.8% | +13.7% | +15.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -100.0% | +4.1% | +0.8% | +15.4% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +11.1% | +30.8% | +19.4% | -15.4% |
Valuation Metrics
STRA leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.1x trailing earnings, PRDO trades at a 28% valuation discount to LAUR's 19.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), STRA offers better value at 1.90x vs LOPE's 2.66x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $139M | $4.0B | $2.1B | $1.8B | $5.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $137M | $4.1B | $2.1B | $1.7B | $5.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.66x | 19.13x | 14.07x | 14.28x | 19.45x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.35x | 14.61x | 11.66x | 10.63x | 17.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.66x | 2.06x | 1.90x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 13.10x | 11.91x | 8.87x | 7.07x | 10.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.17x | 3.62x | 2.52x | 1.39x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.40x | 5.53x | 2.32x | 1.07x | 4.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 20.12x | 16.78x | 9.85x | 11.43x | 19.94x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LOPE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LOPE delivers a 29.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $8 for STRA. STRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LAUR's 0.71x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), STRA scores 8/9 vs LAUR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +18.8% | +29.5% | +17.2% | +7.9% | +25.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +11.7% | +21.9% | +13.2% | +6.2% | +12.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +27.1% | +32.5% | +15.3% | +9.0% | +20.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +24.9% | +33.9% | +17.5% | +10.7% | +26.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.43x | 0.27x | 0.11x | 0.07x | 0.71x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $88M | -$27M | -$32M | $701M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $112M | $132M | $141M | $147M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $200M | $105M | $109M | $847M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 136.29x | — | 35.92x | — | 34.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LAUR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LAUR five years ago would be worth $30,175 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,413 for STRA. Over the past 12 months, LAUR leads with a +66.7% total return vs LOPE's -19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LAUR at 45.9% vs STRA's 3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.4% | -10.8% | +18.0% | +0.0% | +10.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.5% | -19.7% | +8.7% | -5.4% | +66.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +41.7% | +186.6% | +11.9% | +210.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +59.7% | +174.5% | +14.1% | +201.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +173.9% | +256.6% | +522.4% | +103.5% | +251.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +39.9% | +12.3% | +42.1% | +3.8% | +45.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LOPE and LAUR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOPE is the less volatile stock with a 0.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LGCY's 1.44 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LAUR currently trades 96.0% from its 52-week high vs LOPE's 66.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.44x | 0.23x | 0.28x | 0.39x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.70 | $223.04 | $38.50 | $88.50 | $38.28 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.94 | $145.00 | $26.66 | $69.70 | $21.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +74.9% | +66.1% | +88.4% | +87.5% | +96.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.0 | 42.5 | 59.4 | 51.1 | 76.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 58K | 253K | 539K | 257K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — PRDO and STRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LGCY as "Buy", LOPE as "Buy", PRDO as "Hold", STRA as "Buy", LAUR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 31.7% upside for LGCY (target: $15) vs -32.2% for LOPE (target: $100). For income investors, STRA offers the higher dividend yield at 3.26% vs PRDO's 1.64%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $14.50 | $100.00 | $44.00 | $87.00 | $39.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 18 | 9 | 18 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.6% | +3.3% | +0.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.56 | $2.52 | $0.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +6.6% | +5.7% | +7.9% | +4.1% |
LOPE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). STRA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LGCY vs LOPE vs PRDO vs STRA vs LAUR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGCY or LOPE or PRDO or STRA or LAUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is the stronger pick with 39. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 0% for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA). Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) offers the better valuation at 14. 1x trailing P/E (11. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Legacy Education Inc. (LGCY) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LGCY or LOPE or PRDO or STRA or LAUR?
On trailing P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the cheapest at 14.
1x versus Laureate Education, Inc. at 19. 4x. On forward P/E, Strategic Education, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 6x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Strategic Education, Inc. wins at 1. 41x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. 's 2. 03x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LGCY or LOPE or PRDO or STRA or LAUR?
Over the past 5 years, Laureate Education, Inc.
(LAUR) delivered a total return of +201. 8%, compared to +14. 1% for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PRDO returned +522. 4% versus STRA's +103. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LGCY or LOPE or PRDO or STRA or LAUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 23β versus Legacy Education Inc. 's 1. 44β — meaning LGCY is approximately 517% more volatile than LOPE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 71% for Laureate Education, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LGCY or LOPE or PRDO or STRA or LAUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Legacy Education Inc.
(LGCY) is pulling ahead at 39. 5% versus 4. 0% for Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Legacy Education Inc. grew EPS 34. 1% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Laureate Education, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LGCY leads at 27. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LGCY or LOPE or PRDO or STRA or LAUR?
Grand Canyon Education, Inc.
(LOPE) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 5% net margin versus 10. 0% for Strategic Education, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LOPE leads at 27. 5% versus 15. 5% for STRA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LGCY or LOPE or PRDO or STRA or LAUR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 41x versus Grand Canyon Education, Inc. 's 2. 03x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Strategic Education, Inc. (STRA) trades at 10. 6x forward P/E versus 17. 1x for Laureate Education, Inc. — 6. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LGCY: 31. 7% to $14. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LGCY or LOPE or PRDO or STRA or LAUR?
In this comparison, STRA (3.
3% yield), PRDO (1. 6% yield) pay a dividend. LGCY, LOPE, LAUR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LGCY or LOPE or PRDO or STRA or LAUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
28), 1. 6% yield, +522. 4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (PRDO: +522. 4%, LGCY: +173. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LGCY and LOPE and PRDO and STRA and LAUR?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGCY is a small-cap high-growth stock; LOPE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock; STRA is a small-cap deep-value stock; LAUR is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PRDO, STRA pay a dividend while LGCY, LOPE, LAUR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.