Financial - Capital Markets
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LGHL vs UP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Airlines, Airports & Air Services
LGHL vs UP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Financial - Capital Markets | Airlines, Airports & Air Services |
| Market Cap | $170K | $218M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $-31M | $736M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-41M | $-294M |
| Gross Margin | 119.5% | 2.2% |
| Operating Margin | 169.8% | -34.3% |
| Total Debt | $5M | $157M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $17M | $134M |
LGHL vs UP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lion Group Holding … (LGHL) | 100 | 0.0 | -100.0% |
| Wheels Up Experienc… (UP) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGHL vs UP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGHL is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.04
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 64.3%, current ratio 0.67x
- Beta 2.04, current ratio 0.67x
UP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -7.0%, EPS growth 14.3%, 3Y rev CAGR -22.5%
- -99.7% 10Y total return vs LGHL's -100.0%
- -7.0% revenue growth vs LGHL's -278.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -7.0% revenue growth vs LGHL's -278.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 87.7% margin vs UP's -39.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 2.04 vs UP's 2.50 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | -71.7% vs LGHL's -99.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -29.1% ROA vs LGHL's -79.2% |
LGHL vs UP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LGHL vs UP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGHL leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UP and LGHL operate at a comparable scale, with $736M and -$31M in trailing revenue. LGHL is the more profitable business, keeping 87.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to UP's -39.9%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | -$31M | $736M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$56M | -$191M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$41M | -$294M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$270M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +119.5% | +2.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +169.8% | -34.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +87.7% | -39.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +61.1% | -36.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -10.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -74.4% | +69.2% |
Valuation Metrics
UP leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $169,698 | $218M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$12M | $241M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.01x | -0.72x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.30x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.02x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
UP leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), UP scores 3/9 vs LGHL's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.6% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -79.2% | -29.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -187.3% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.7% | -167.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.64x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$12M | $23M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $17M | $134M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $5M | $157M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -55.08x | -2.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
UP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in UP five years ago would be worth $30 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $0 for LGHL. Over the past 12 months, UP leads with a -71.7% total return vs LGHL's -99.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors UP at -60.7% vs LGHL's -96.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -94.5% | -54.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.6% | -71.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -93.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -100.0% | -99.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -96.9% | -60.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LGHL and UP each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGHL is the less volatile stock with a 2.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UP's 2.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. UP currently trades 8.6% from its 52-week high vs LGHL's 0.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 2.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $377.52 | $70.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.77 | $0.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.2% | +8.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 21.1 | 41.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 32K | 130K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $500.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
UP leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LGHL leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
LGHL vs UP: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGHL or UP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Wheels Up Experience Inc.
(UP) is the stronger pick with -7. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -278. 8% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL). Analysts rate Wheels Up Experience Inc. (UP) a "Hold" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LGHL or UP?
Over the past 5 years, Wheels Up Experience Inc.
(UP) delivered a total return of -99. 7%, compared to -100. 0% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UP returned -99. 7% versus LGHL's -100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LGHL or UP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lion Group Holding Ltd.
(LGHL) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 04β versus Wheels Up Experience Inc. 's 2. 50β — meaning UP is approximately 22% more volatile than LGHL relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LGHL or UP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Wheels Up Experience Inc.
(UP) is pulling ahead at -7. 0% versus -278. 8% for Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Wheels Up Experience Inc. grew EPS 14. 3% year-over-year, compared to -21. 2% for Lion Group Holding Ltd.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LGHL or UP?
Lion Group Holding Ltd.
(LGHL) is the more profitable company, earning 87. 7% net margin versus -39. 9% for Wheels Up Experience Inc. — meaning it keeps 87. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LGHL leads at 169. 8% versus -34. 3% for UP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LGHL leads at 119. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LGHL or UP?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LGHL or UP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Wheels Up Experience Inc.
(UP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Lion Group Holding Ltd. (LGHL) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (UP: -99. 7%, LGHL: -100. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LGHL and UP?
These companies operate in different sectors (LGHL (Financial Services) and UP (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.