LGO
Largo Inc.
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$104M
5Y Perf.-76.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LGO vs NB
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
NB
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
Industrial Materials
Market Cap$773M
5Y Perf.+0.6%
LGO vs NB — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LGO | NB |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $104M | $773M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-64M | $-55M |
| Gross Margin | -22.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -36.4% | — |
| Total Debt | $18M | $131K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $26M |
LGO vs NB — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LGO
NB
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largo Inc. (LGO) | 100 | 23.9 | -76.1% |
| NioCorp Development… (NB) | 100 | 100.6 | +0.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGO vs NB
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: NB leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LGO
Largo Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
In this particular matchup, LGO is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
Best for: basic materials exposure
NB
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
The Income Pick
NB carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.50
- EPS growth -16.1%
- -15.5% 10Y total return vs LGO's -69.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | NB | 150.8% revenue growth vs LGO's -37.1% |
| Quality / Margins | NB | 0.1% margin vs LGO's -57.3% |
| Stability / Safety | NB | Beta 1.50 vs LGO's 2.15, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | NB | +156.0% vs LGO's -12.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | NB | -15.9% ROA vs LGO's -19.9%, ROIC -148.0% vs -15.3% |
LGO vs NB — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLNBLAGGINGLGO
LGOLargo Inc.
0leads
NBNioCorp Developments …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs LGOMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
—
—
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
NB6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
NB5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
NB2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGO and NB operate at a comparable scale, with $112M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | LGOLargo Inc. | NBNioCorp Developme… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | -$25M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$64M | -$55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$29M | -$30M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -22.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -57.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | — |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LGO and NB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LGOLargo Inc. | NBNioCorp Developme… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $104M | $773M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $99M | $748M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.59x | -17.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.83x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.46x | 9.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Evenly matched — LGO and NB each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NB delivers a -18.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-18 in annual profit, vs $-47 for LGO. NB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LGO's 0.10x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NB scores 4/9 vs LGO's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | LGOLargo Inc. | NBNioCorp Developme… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.1% | -18.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.9% | -15.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.3% | -148.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.6% | -47.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$25M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $26M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $131,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.25x | -249.13x |
NB leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in NB five years ago would be worth $8,454 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $689 for LGO. Over the past 12 months, NB leads with a +156.0% total return vs LGO's -12.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NB at 2.2% vs LGO's -35.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LGOLargo Inc. | NBNioCorp Developme… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +18.1% | +7.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -12.1% | +156.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.4% | +6.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.1% | -15.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -69.0% | -15.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.7% | +2.2% |
NB leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
NB is the less volatile stock with a 1.50 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LGO's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NB currently trades 50.9% from its 52-week high vs LGO's 45.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LGOLargo Inc. | NBNioCorp Developme… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.15x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.70 | $12.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.85 | $2.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +45.9% | +50.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.0 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 4.5M |
NB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LGO as "Buy" and NB as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.8% upside for LGO (target: $3) vs 46.1% for NB (target: $9).
| Metric | LGOLargo Inc. | NBNioCorp Developme… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.80 | $9.35 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 2 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
NB leads in 3 of 6 categories — strongest in Profitability & Efficiency and Total Returns. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallNioCorp Developments Ltd. (NB)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LGO vs NB: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGO or NB a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Largo Inc.
(LGO) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LGO or NB?
Over the past 5 years, NioCorp Developments Ltd.
(NB) delivered a total return of -15. 5%, compared to -93. 1% for Largo Inc. (LGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NB returned -15. 5% versus LGO's -69. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LGO or NB?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NioCorp Developments Ltd.
(NB) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 50β versus Largo Inc. 's 2. 15β — meaning LGO is approximately 43% more volatile than NB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NioCorp Developments Ltd. (NB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 10% for Largo Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LGO or NB?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NioCorp Developments Ltd.
grew EPS -16. 1% year-over-year, compared to -66. 0% for Largo Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LGO or NB?
NioCorp Developments Ltd.
(NB) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -39. 9% for Largo Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NB leads at 0. 0% versus -37. 0% for LGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NB leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LGO or NB?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LGO or NB better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, NioCorp Developments Ltd.
(NB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding. Largo Inc. (LGO) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NB: -15. 5%, LGO: -69. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LGO and NB?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.