Industrial Materials
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LGO vs SLI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial Materials
LGO vs SLI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial Materials | Industrial Materials |
| Market Cap | $97M | $932M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $112M | $0.00 |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-64M | $166M |
| Gross Margin | -22.5% | — |
| Operating Margin | -36.4% | — |
| Forward P/E | — | 6.5x |
| Total Debt | $18M | $989K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $22M | $39M |
LGO vs SLI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Largo Inc. (LGO) | 100 | 17.6 | -82.4% |
| Standard Lithium Lt… (SLI) | 100 | 550.7 | +450.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGO vs SLI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
In this particular matchup, LGO is outpaced on most metrics by others in the set.
SLI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.55
- EPS growth 428.0%
- 220.5% 10Y total return vs LGO's -74.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 401.6% revenue growth vs LGO's -37.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.55 vs LGO's 2.15, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +175.4% vs LGO's -18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 60.4% ROA vs LGO's -19.9%, ROIC -16.9% vs -15.3% |
LGO vs SLI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LGO vs SLI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SLI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LGO and SLI operate at a comparable scale, with $112M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $112M | $0 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$17M | -$7M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$64M | $166M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$29M | -$23M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -22.5% | — |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -36.4% | — |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -57.3% | — |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -26.3% | — |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.2% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.7% | -103.3% |
Valuation Metrics
LGO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $97M | $932M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $92M | $904M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.49x | 6.51x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.78x | — |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.43x | 2.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SLI leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SLI delivers a 68.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $68 in annual profit, vs $-47 for LGO. SLI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LGO's 0.10x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -47.1% | +68.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -19.9% | +60.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -15.3% | -16.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.6% | -21.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.10x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | -$52M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $22M | $39M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $18M | $989,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.25x | 2702.72x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SLI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SLI five years ago would be worth $11,672 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $643 for LGO. Over the past 12 months, SLI leads with a +175.4% total return vs LGO's -18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SLI at 5.4% vs LGO's -37.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +10.5% | -18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -18.3% | +175.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -75.1% | +17.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -93.6% | +16.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.2% | +220.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -37.1% | +5.4% |
Risk & Volatility
SLI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SLI is the less volatile stock with a 1.55 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LGO's 2.15 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SLI currently trades 61.1% from its 52-week high vs LGO's 43.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.15x | 1.55x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.70 | $6.40 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.85 | $1.40 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.0% | +61.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 57.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.3M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LGO as "Buy" and SLI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 141.4% upside for LGO (target: $3) vs 21.5% for SLI (target: $5).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $2.80 | $4.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
SLI leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LGO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
LGO vs SLI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGO or SLI a better buy right now?
Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) offers the better valuation at 6. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Largo Inc. (LGO) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LGO or SLI?
Over the past 5 years, Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) delivered a total return of +16. 7%, compared to -93. 6% for Largo Inc. (LGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SLI returned +220. 5% versus LGO's -74. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LGO or SLI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 55β versus Largo Inc. 's 2. 15β — meaning LGO is approximately 38% more volatile than SLI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Standard Lithium Ltd. (SLI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 10% for Largo Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LGO or SLI?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Standard Lithium Ltd.
grew EPS 428. 0% year-over-year, compared to -66. 0% for Largo Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LGO or SLI?
Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -39. 9% for Largo Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SLI leads at 0. 0% versus -37. 0% for LGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SLI leads at 0. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LGO or SLI?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LGO or SLI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Standard Lithium Ltd.
(SLI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+220. 5% 10Y return). Largo Inc. (LGO) carries a higher beta of 2. 15 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SLI: +220. 5%, LGO: -74. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LGO and SLI?
Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SLI is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.