Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LGVN vs MESO vs NKTR vs BCLI vs PLUR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
Biotechnology
LGVN vs MESO vs NKTR vs BCLI vs PLUR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $20M | $1.91B | $1.69B | $7M | $27M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1M | $17M | $55M | $849K | $1M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-23M | $-102M | $-164M | $-11M | $-26M |
| Gross Margin | 43.7% | -208.5% | 99.6% | 61.5% | 21.3% |
| Operating Margin | -19.4% | -6.4% | -237.9% | -14.0% | -18.6% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 0.3x | — |
| Total Debt | $824K | $128M | $149M | $720K | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $161M | $15M | $187K | $6M |
LGVN vs MESO vs NKTR vs BCLI vs PLUR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Longeveron Inc. (LGVN) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| Mesoblast Limited (MESO) | 100 | 77.1 | -22.9% |
| Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) | 100 | 24.5 | -75.5% |
| Brainstorm Cell The… (BCLI) | 100 | 1.1 | -98.9% |
| Pluri Inc. (PLUR) | 100 | 6.6 | -93.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LGVN vs MESO vs NKTR vs BCLI vs PLUR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LGVN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.95
- Lower volatility, beta 0.95, Low D/E 14.5%, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.95, current ratio 1.33x
- Beta 0.95 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage
MESO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding.
- -2.1% 10Y total return vs NKTR's -59.1%
- -13.0% ROA vs BCLI's -446.1%
NKTR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for quality and momentum.
- -297.1% margin vs PLUR's -19.5%
- +8.2% vs LGVN's -42.8%
Among these 5 stocks, BCLI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
PLUR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 309.8%, EPS growth 10.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 78.7%
- 309.8% revenue growth vs LGVN's -49.9%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 309.8% revenue growth vs LGVN's -49.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | -297.1% margin vs PLUR's -19.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.95 vs NKTR's 1.85, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +8.2% vs LGVN's -42.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -13.0% ROA vs BCLI's -446.1% |
LGVN vs MESO vs NKTR vs BCLI vs PLUR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LGVN vs MESO vs NKTR vs BCLI vs PLUR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NKTR leads in 2 of 6 categories
MESO leads 1 • LGVN leads 0 • BCLI leads 0 • PLUR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKTR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NKTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $55M annually — 65.1x BCLI's $849,000. NKTR is the more profitable business, keeping -3.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUR's -19.5%. On growth, MESO holds the edge at +4.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1M | $17M | $55M | $849,000 | $1M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$22M | -$106M | -$130M | -$12M | -$24M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$23M | -$102M | -$164M | -$11M | -$26M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$19M | -$49M | -$209M | -$9M | -$22M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +43.7% | -2.1% | +99.6% | +61.5% | +21.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -19.4% | -6.4% | -2.4% | -14.0% | -18.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -18.9% | -5.9% | -3.0% | -13.5% | -19.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -15.9% | -2.8% | -3.8% | -11.2% | -16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -39.5% | +4.6% | -25.3% | — | +7.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +16.0% | -4.5% | +37.0% | -34.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LGVN and MESO and BCLI each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20M | $1.9B | $1.7B | $7M | $27M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $16M | $1.9B | $1.8B | $8M | $55M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.66x | -17.62x | -8.57x | 0.32x | -0.94x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 16.56x | 111.04x | 30.64x | 8.27x | 20.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.64x | 2.99x | 15.66x | — | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MESO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MESO delivers a -17.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-17 in annual profit, vs $-10 for PLUR. LGVN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NKTR's 1.66x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MESO scores 5/9 vs PLUR's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -199.8% | -17.1% | -4.0% | — | -9.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -143.2% | -13.0% | -62.8% | -4.5% | -74.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -5.9% | -8.5% | -57.2% | — | -59.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -159.8% | -9.8% | -55.7% | — | -107.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.21x | 1.66x | — | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$4M | -$33M | $134M | $533,000 | $28M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $161M | $15M | $187,000 | $6M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $824,000 | $128M | $149M | $720,000 | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -5.84x | -4.74x | -26.44x | -29.30x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
NKTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MESO five years ago would be worth $10,602 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $146 for BCLI. Over the past 12 months, NKTR leads with a +818.2% total return vs LGVN's -42.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NKTR at 93.3% vs BCLI's -74.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +43.6% | -18.5% | +92.0% | +13.7% | +11.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.8% | +33.9% | +818.2% | -42.7% | -32.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -97.3% | +117.0% | +621.8% | -98.4% | -54.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.5% | +6.0% | -72.3% | -98.5% | -89.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -2.1% | -59.1% | -97.8% | -97.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -70.0% | +29.5% | +93.3% | -74.9% | -23.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LGVN and NKTR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LGVN is the less volatile stock with a 0.95 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NKTR's 1.85 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NKTR currently trades 76.5% from its 52-week high vs BCLI's 36.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.95x | 1.70x | 1.85x | 1.12x | 1.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $1.80 | $21.50 | $109.00 | $1.92 | $6.10 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.47 | $9.88 | $7.99 | $0.46 | $2.82 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +47.3% | +68.8% | +76.5% | +36.1% | +54.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.1 | 53.7 | 53.4 | 39.3 | 46.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.7M | 256K | 991K | 9K | 6K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MESO as "Buy", NKTR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 259.3% upside for PLUR (target: $12) vs -22.3% for MESO (target: $12).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $11.50 | $132.83 | — | $12.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 11 | 33 | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
NKTR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). MESO leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LGVN vs MESO vs NKTR vs BCLI vs PLUR: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LGVN or MESO or NKTR or BCLI or PLUR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Pluri Inc.
(PLUR) is the stronger pick with 309. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 9% for Longeveron Inc. (LGVN). Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI) offers the better valuation at 0. 3x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mesoblast Limited (MESO) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LGVN or MESO or NKTR or BCLI or PLUR?
Over the past 5 years, Mesoblast Limited (MESO) delivered a total return of +6.
0%, compared to -98. 5% for Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. (BCLI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MESO returned -2. 1% versus LGVN's -98. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LGVN or MESO or NKTR or BCLI or PLUR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Longeveron Inc.
(LGVN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 95β versus Nektar Therapeutics's 1. 85β — meaning NKTR is approximately 94% more volatile than LGVN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Longeveron Inc. (LGVN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 166% for Nektar Therapeutics — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LGVN or MESO or NKTR or BCLI or PLUR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Pluri Inc.
(PLUR) is pulling ahead at 309. 8% versus -49. 9% for Longeveron Inc. (LGVN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc. grew EPS 148. 9% year-over-year, compared to -20. 6% for Longeveron Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLUR leads at 78. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LGVN or MESO or NKTR or BCLI or PLUR?
Brainstorm Cell Therapeutics Inc.
(BCLI) is the more profitable company, earning 1369% net margin versus -1893. 6% for Longeveron Inc. — meaning it keeps 1369% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NKTR leads at -236. 8% versus -1942. 2% for LGVN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NKTR leads at 100. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LGVN or MESO or NKTR or BCLI or PLUR?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LGVN or MESO or NKTR or BCLI or PLUR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Longeveron Inc.
(LGVN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 95)). Nektar Therapeutics (NKTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 85 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LGVN: -98. 9%, NKTR: -59. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LGVN and MESO and NKTR and BCLI and PLUR?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LGVN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MESO is a small-cap high-growth stock; NKTR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BCLI is a small-cap deep-value stock; PLUR is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.