LHX vs GD

For growth investors, General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is the stronger pick with 10.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). General Dynamics Corporation (GD) offers the better valuation at 22. 5x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) a "Buy" — based on 32 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is the cheapest at 22.

5x versus L3Harris Technologies, Inc. at 35. 3x. On forward P/E, General Dynamics Corporation is actually cheaper at 21. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: L3Harris Technologies, Inc. wins at 2. 48x versus General Dynamics Corporation's 2. 99x.

Over the past 5 years, General Dynamics Corporation (GD) delivered a total return of +92.

4%, compared to +47. 8% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LHX returned +346. 1% versus GD's +175. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

(LHX) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 39β versus General Dynamics Corporation's 0. 56β — meaning GD is approximately 44% more volatile than LHX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, General Dynamics Corporation (GD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 38% versus 53% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is pulling ahead at 10.

1% versus 2. 5% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: General Dynamics Corporation grew EPS 13. 4% year-over-year, compared to 8. 4% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GD leads at 10. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) is the more profitable company, earning 8.

0% net margin versus 7. 3% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GD leads at 10. 2% versus 10. 0% for LHX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LHX leads at 25. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 48x versus General Dynamics Corporation's 2. 99x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, General Dynamics Corporation (GD) trades at 21. 1x forward P/E versus 26. 0x for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GD: 17. 6% to $408. 83.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

General Dynamics Corporation (GD) offers the highest yield at 1. 7%, versus 1. 6% for L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX).

For long-horizon retirement investors, L3Harris Technologies, Inc.

(LHX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 39), 1. 6% yield, +346. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LHX: +346. 1%, GD: +175. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.