Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LICN vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FEDU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Business Services
Communication Equipment
Education & Training Services
LICN vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FEDU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Specialty Business Services | Communication Equipment | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $2M | $529.86B | $19.12B | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $80M | $72M | $71M | $251M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $-25.02B | $-342M | $801K |
| Gross Margin | 58.8% | 40.8% | 53.4% | 18.8% |
| Operating Margin | -0.5% | -121.4% | -405.7% | -6.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.0x | — | 18.8x |
| Total Debt | $61K | $8.76B | $32M | $98M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $24.81B | $2.34B | $211M |
LICN vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FEDU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Feb 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lichen Internationa… (LICN) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) | 100 | 195.6 | +95.6% |
| AST SpaceMobile, In… (ASTS) | 100 | 1014.7 | +914.7% |
| Four Seasons Educat… (FEDU) | 100 | 107.0 | +7.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LICN vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FEDU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LICN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.52, Low D/E 0.1%, current ratio 7.96x
SPIR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (10.0x vs 18.8x)
ASTS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 15.1%, EPS growth 30.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 72.5%
- 5.7% 10Y total return vs SPIR's -78.8%
- 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2%
- +158.1% vs FEDU's +38.0%
FEDU carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.29, yield 100.0%
- Beta 0.29, yield 100.0%, current ratio 2.19x
- 0.3% margin vs SPIR's -349.6%
- Beta 0.29 vs SPIR's 2.93
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 15.1% revenue growth vs SPIR's -35.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.0x vs 18.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 0.3% margin vs SPIR's -349.6% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.29 vs SPIR's 2.93 | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +158.1% vs FEDU's +38.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.1% ROA vs SPIR's -47.3%, ROIC -3.0% vs -0.1% |
LICN vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FEDU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
LICN vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FEDU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LICN leads in 1 of 6 categories
SPIR leads 1 • ASTS leads 1 • FEDU leads 1 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LICN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FEDU is the larger business by revenue, generating $251M annually — 3.5x ASTS's $71M. FEDU is the more profitable business, keeping 0.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SPIR's -349.6%. On growth, ASTS holds the edge at +27.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $80M | $72M | $71M | $251M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $5M | -$74M | -$237M | -$11M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | -$25.0B | -$342M | $801,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$9M | -$16.2B | -$1.1B | $0 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.8% | +40.8% | +53.4% | +18.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -0.5% | -121.4% | -4.1% | -6.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.7% | -349.6% | -4.8% | +0.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -11.4% | -227.0% | -16.0% | -14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -21.2% | -26.9% | +27.3% | +83.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -642.1% | +59.5% | -55.6% | -12.3% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LICN and ASTS and FEDU each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 10.0x trailing earnings, SPIR trades at a 47% valuation discount to FEDU's 18.8x P/E.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2M | $529.9B | $19.1B | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$25M | $513.8B | $16.8B | -$14M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -14.49x | 10.01x | -48.76x | 18.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.04x | 7405.21x | 269.64x | 0.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.17x | 4.56x | 5.68x | 0.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
SPIR leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FEDU delivers a 0.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $0 in annual profit, vs $-88 for SPIR. LICN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FEDU's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SPIR scores 5/9 vs LICN's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.6% | -88.4% | -21.1% | +0.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -11.9% | -47.3% | -12.6% | +0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -8.1% | -0.1% | -47.1% | -3.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -6.6% | -0.1% | -10.0% | -2.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.08x | 0.01x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$27M | -$16.1B | -$2.3B | -$112M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $24.8B | $2.3B | $211M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $61,000 | $8.8B | $32M | $98M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 9.20x | -21.20x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ASTS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ASTS five years ago would be worth $78,824 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $85 for LICN. Over the past 12 months, ASTS leads with a +158.1% total return vs FEDU's +38.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ASTS at 134.8% vs LICN's -76.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +104.1% | +106.4% | -21.7% | -10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +67.8% | +73.1% | +158.1% | +38.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +198.1% | +1194.0% | +30.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -79.6% | +688.2% | -40.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | -78.8% | +568.8% | -88.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -76.8% | +43.9% | +134.8% | +9.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LICN and FEDU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FEDU is the less volatile stock with a 0.29 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SPIR's 2.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LICN currently trades 71.7% from its 52-week high vs ASTS's 50.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 2.93x | 2.82x | 0.29x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.28 | $23.59 | $129.89 | $17.30 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.57 | $6.60 | $22.47 | $6.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +71.7% | +68.3% | +50.3% | +60.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.4 | 55.5 | 41.8 | 50.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 42K | 1.6M | 14.9M | 1K |
Analyst Outlook
FEDU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: SPIR as "Buy", ASTS as "Buy", FEDU as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 58.6% upside for ASTS (target: $104) vs 7.0% for SPIR (target: $17). FEDU is the only dividend payer here at 100.00% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $17.25 | $103.65 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 12 | 7 | 1 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +100.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $164.29 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LICN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). SPIR leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
LICN vs SPIR vs ASTS vs FEDU: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LICN or SPIR or ASTS or FEDU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is the stronger pick with 1505% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) offers the better valuation at 10. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LICN or SPIR or ASTS or FEDU?
On trailing P/E, Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the cheapest at 10. 0x versus Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. at 18. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LICN or SPIR or ASTS or FEDU?
Over the past 5 years, AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) delivered a total return of +688. 2%, compared to -99. 2% for Lichen International Limited (LICN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ASTS returned +568. 8% versus LICN's -99. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LICN or SPIR or ASTS or FEDU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 29β versus Spire Global, Inc. 's 2. 93β — meaning SPIR is approximately 916% more volatile than FEDU relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lichen International Limited (LICN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 19% for Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LICN or SPIR or ASTS or FEDU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), AST SpaceMobile, Inc.
(ASTS) is pulling ahead at 1505% versus -35. 2% for Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Spire Global, Inc. grew EPS 137. 8% year-over-year, compared to -100. 6% for Lichen International Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, ASTS leads at 72. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LICN or SPIR or ASTS or FEDU?
Spire Global, Inc.
(SPIR) is the more profitable company, earning 71. 7% net margin versus -482. 2% for AST SpaceMobile, Inc. — meaning it keeps 71. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FEDU leads at -6. 3% versus -405. 7% for ASTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LICN leads at 61. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — LICN or SPIR or ASTS or FEDU?
In this comparison, FEDU (100.
0% yield) pays a dividend. LICN, SPIR, ASTS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LICN or SPIR or ASTS or FEDU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Four Seasons Education (Cayman) Inc.
(FEDU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 29), 100. 0% yield). Spire Global, Inc. (SPIR) carries a higher beta of 2. 93 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FEDU: -88. 5%, SPIR: -78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LICN and SPIR and ASTS and FEDU?
These companies operate in different sectors (LICN (Industrials) and SPIR (Industrials) and ASTS (Technology) and FEDU (Consumer Defensive)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LICN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SPIR is a large-cap deep-value stock; ASTS is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FEDU is a small-cap high-growth stock. FEDU pays a dividend while LICN, SPIR, ASTS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
- Sector: Consumer Defensive
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 41%
- Dividend Yield > 40.0%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.