Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LINC vs GHC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Education & Training Services
LINC vs GHC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $1.42B | $4.88B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $518M | $3.75B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $20M | $298M |
| Gross Margin | 56.7% | 27.7% |
| Operating Margin | 5.9% | 7.1% |
| Forward P/E | 64.3x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $204M | $1.73B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $29M | $267M |
LINC vs GHC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lincoln Educational… (LINC) | 100 | 1153.8 | +1053.8% |
| Graham Holdings Com… (GHC) | 100 | 313.4 | +213.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LINC vs GHC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LINC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.78
- Rev growth 17.8%, EPS growth 103.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.2%
- 22.3% 10Y total return vs GHC's 145.9%
GHC is the clearest fit if your priority is value and quality.
- Lower P/E (16.9x vs 64.3x)
- 7.9% margin vs LINC's 3.9%
- 0.6% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 17.8% revenue growth vs GHC's 2.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.9x vs 64.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.9% margin vs LINC's 3.9% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.78 vs GHC's 0.87 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield; 9-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +144.4% vs GHC's +18.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.1% ROA vs GHC's 3.7%, ROIC 6.8% vs 3.3% |
LINC vs GHC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LINC vs GHC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GHC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GHC is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.7B annually — 7.2x LINC's $518M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.9% (GHC) to 3.9% (LINC). On growth, LINC holds the edge at +19.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $518M | $3.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $47M | $394M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $20M | $298M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$27M | $286M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +56.7% | +27.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +5.9% | +7.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -5.3% | +7.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.7% | -100.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +90.9% | +805.7% |
Valuation Metrics
GHC leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 16.9x trailing earnings, GHC trades at a 76% valuation discount to LINC's 69.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, GHC's 15.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LINC's 32.3x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.4B | $4.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $1.6B | $6.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 69.23x | 16.89x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 64.29x | 16.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 6.21x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 32.31x | 14.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.75x | 0.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 7.04x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.24x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LINC leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LINC delivers a 10.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $6 for GHC. GHC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.36x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LINC's 1.02x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.0% | +6.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.1% | +3.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | +3.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.2% | +3.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.02x | 0.36x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $175M | $1.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $29M | $267M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $204M | $1.7B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.65x | 10.06x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LINC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LINC five years ago would be worth $65,312 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,754 for GHC. Over the past 12 months, LINC leads with a +144.4% total return vs GHC's +18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LINC at 94.0% vs GHC's 25.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +93.1% | +3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +144.4% | +18.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +630.5% | +97.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +553.1% | +77.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +2231.6% | +145.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +94.0% | +25.5% |
Risk & Volatility
LINC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LINC is the less volatile stock with a 0.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than GHC's 0.87 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LINC currently trades 98.9% from its 52-week high vs GHC's 91.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.78x | 0.87x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.48 | $1224.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $17.29 | $882.21 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.9% | +91.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.9 | 52.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 464K | 19K |
Analyst Outlook
GHC leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
GHC is the only dividend payer here at 0.64% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.80 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 9 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $7.17 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.1% |
GHC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LINC leads in 3 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns).
LINC vs GHC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LINC or GHC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) is the stronger pick with 17.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 5% for Graham Holdings Company (GHC). Graham Holdings Company (GHC) offers the better valuation at 16. 9x trailing P/E (16. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LINC or GHC?
On trailing P/E, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the cheapest at 16.
9x versus Lincoln Educational Services Corporation at 69. 2x. On forward P/E, Graham Holdings Company is actually cheaper at 16. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LINC or GHC?
Over the past 5 years, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) delivered a total return of +553.
1%, compared to +77. 5% for Graham Holdings Company (GHC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LINC returned +22. 3% versus GHC's +145. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LINC or GHC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
78β versus Graham Holdings Company's 0. 87β — meaning GHC is approximately 12% more volatile than LINC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 36% versus 102% for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LINC or GHC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (LINC) is pulling ahead at 17.
8% versus 2. 5% for Graham Holdings Company (GHC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lincoln Educational Services Corporation grew EPS 103. 1% year-over-year, compared to -59. 3% for Graham Holdings Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, LINC leads at 14. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LINC or GHC?
Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the more profitable company, earning 6.
0% net margin versus 3. 9% for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LINC leads at 5. 8% versus 5. 1% for GHC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LINC leads at 56. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LINC or GHC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) trades at 16.
9x forward P/E versus 64. 3x for Lincoln Educational Services Corporation — 47. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — LINC or GHC?
In this comparison, GHC (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. LINC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LINC or GHC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Graham Holdings Company (GHC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
87), 0. 6% yield, +145. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GHC: +145. 9%, LINC: +22. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LINC and GHC?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LINC is a small-cap high-growth stock; GHC is a small-cap deep-value stock. GHC pays a dividend while LINC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.