Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LIQT vs POWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
LIQT vs POWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Semiconductors |
| Market Cap | $21M | $4.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17M | $444M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-9M | $22M |
| Gross Margin | 4.9% | 54.5% |
| Operating Margin | -50.0% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | 60.5x |
| Total Debt | $12M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | — | $59M |
LIQT vs POWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 4.4 | -95.6% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 144.4 | +44.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LIQT vs POWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LIQT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.52
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 45.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52
POWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 264.8% 10Y total return vs LIQT's -91.3%
- 5.0% margin vs LIQT's -53.3%
- 1.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% revenue growth vs POWI's 5.9% | |
| Quality / Margins | 5.0% margin vs LIQT's -53.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs POWI's 2.08 | |
| Dividends | 1.1% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +57.8% vs LIQT's +56.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.8% ROA vs LIQT's -29.5%, ROIC 2.4% vs -31.1% |
LIQT vs POWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LIQT vs POWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POWI is the larger business by revenue, generating $444M annually — 26.4x LIQT's $17M. POWI is the more profitable business, keeping 5.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LIQT's -53.3%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17M | $444M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | $54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$9M | $22M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$7M | $87M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.9% | +54.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -50.0% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -53.3% | +5.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -39.3% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +53.6% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +69.4% | +50.0% |
Valuation Metrics
LIQT leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $21M | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $33M | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.43x | 200.59x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 60.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 86.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.26x | 9.83x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.00x | 6.55x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 50.02x |
Profitability & Efficiency
POWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POWI delivers a 3.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-70 for LIQT. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), POWI scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -70.0% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.5% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -31.1% | +2.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +2.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.17x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $12M | -$59M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | — | $59M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -13.46x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
POWI leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in POWI five years ago would be worth $10,143 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $370 for LIQT. Over the past 12 months, POWI leads with a +57.8% total return vs LIQT's +56.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors POWI at 0.6% vs LIQT's -13.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +45.0% | +110.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +56.5% | +57.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -35.7% | +1.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -96.3% | +1.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +264.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.7% | +0.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIQT and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIQT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. POWI currently trades 99.1% from its 52-week high vs LIQT's 64.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 2.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $3.35 | $78.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.30 | $30.86 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.5% | +99.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.9 | 75.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 50K | 948K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
POWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.07% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $79.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.84 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.3% |
POWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LIQT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LIQT vs POWI: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LIQT or POWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) offers the better valuation at 200. 6x trailing P/E (60. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LIQT or POWI?
Over the past 5 years, Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) delivered a total return of +1. 4%, compared to -96. 3% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWI returned +264. 8% versus LIQT's -91. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LIQT or POWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 08β — meaning POWI is approximately 298% more volatile than LIQT relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LIQT or POWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIQT leads at 1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LIQT or POWI?
Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: POWI leads at 4. 8% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LIQT or POWI?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
1% yield) pays a dividend. LIQT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is LIQT or POWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52)). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) carries a higher beta of 2. 08 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIQT: -91. 3%, POWI: +264. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LIQT and POWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (LIQT (Industrials) and POWI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
POWI pays a dividend while LIQT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.