LIQT vs POWI vs MPWR vs DIOD vs TXN

For growth investors, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is the stronger pick with 26. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) offers the better valuation at 52. 3x trailing P/E (37. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the cheapest at 52.

3x versus Power Integrations, Inc. at 184. 2x. On forward P/E, Texas Instruments Incorporated is actually cheaper at 37. 8x.

Over the past 5 years, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) delivered a total return of +366. 2%, compared to -96. 1% for LiqTech International, Inc. (LIQT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MPWR returned +24. 9% versus LIQT's -90. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiqTech International, Inc.

(LIQT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. 's 2. 28β — meaning MPWR is approximately 335% more volatile than LIQT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 117% for LiqTech International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.

(MPWR) is pulling ahead at 26. 4% versus 5. 9% for Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Diodes Incorporated grew EPS 50. 5% year-over-year, compared to -65. 2% for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MPWR leads at 15. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the more profitable company, earning 28.

3% net margin versus -51. 7% for LiqTech International, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TXN leads at 34. 1% versus -50. 3% for LIQT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TXN leads at 57. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) trades at 37.

8x forward P/E versus 73. 1x for Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. — 35. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for POWI: 10. 0% to $79. 00.

In this comparison, TXN (1.

9% yield), POWI (1. 2% yield), MPWR (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. LIQT, DIOD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Texas Instruments Incorporated (TXN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

11), 1. 9% yield, +471. 6% 10Y return). Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) carries a higher beta of 2. 28 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (TXN: +471. 6%, MPWR: +24. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (LIQT (Industrials) and POWI (Technology) and MPWR (Technology) and DIOD (Technology) and TXN (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LIQT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MPWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock; DIOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; TXN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. POWI, TXN pay a dividend while LIQT, MPWR, DIOD do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.