LIVE vs AMWD

For growth investors, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the stronger pick with -5.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 6x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) a "Hold" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.

6x versus American Woodmark Corporation at 6. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) delivered a total return of -60.

8%, compared to -65. 8% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIVE returned +28. 8% versus AMWD's -48. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

23β versus American Woodmark Corporation's 1. 49β — meaning AMWD is approximately 21% more volatile than LIVE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 56% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is pulling ahead at -5.

9% versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to -9. 1% for American Woodmark Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD) is the more profitable company, earning 5.

8% net margin versus 5. 1% for Live Ventures Incorporated — meaning it keeps 5. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMWD leads at 8. 2% versus 3. 3% for LIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIVE leads at 32. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.

23)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIVE: +28. 8%, AMWD: -48. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.