LIVE vs TILE vs MHK vs AMWD

For growth investors, Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the stronger pick with 5. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) offers the better valuation at 2. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Interface, Inc. (TILE) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE) is the cheapest at 2.

7x versus Mohawk Industries, Inc. at 17. 3x. On forward P/E, Mohawk Industries, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Interface, Inc.

(TILE) delivered a total return of +99. 4%, compared to -64. 9% for Live Ventures Incorporated (LIVE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TILE returned +74. 9% versus MHK's -47. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 00β versus American Woodmark Corporation's 1. 49β — meaning AMWD is approximately 49% more volatile than TILE relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Interface, Inc. (TILE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 2% for Live Ventures Incorporated — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is pulling ahead at 5. 4% versus -7. 5% for American Woodmark Corporation (AMWD). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Live Ventures Incorporated grew EPS 158. 1% year-over-year, compared to -27. 1% for Mohawk Industries, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIVE leads at 15. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 4% net margin versus 3. 4% for Mohawk Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TILE leads at 11. 8% versus 3. 3% for LIVE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TILE leads at 38. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Mohawk Industries, Inc.

(MHK) trades at 11. 2x forward P/E versus 16. 1x for American Woodmark Corporation — 4. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TILE: 30. 7% to $36. 00.

In this comparison, TILE (0.

2% yield) pays a dividend. LIVE, MHK, AMWD do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Interface, Inc.

(TILE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 00)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TILE: +74. 9%, AMWD: -47. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.