LMAT vs ABT

For growth investors, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

(LMAT) is the stronger pick with 13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 6% for Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Abbott Laboratories (ABT) offers the better valuation at 11. 3x trailing P/E (15. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the cheapest at 11.

3x versus LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. at 43. 7x. On forward P/E, Abbott Laboratories is actually cheaper at 15. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Abbott Laboratories wins at 0. 52x versus LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. 's 1. 96x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

(LMAT) delivered a total return of +121. 9%, compared to -18. 4% for Abbott Laboratories (ABT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LMAT returned +619. 5% versus ABT's +171. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

25β versus LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. 's 0. 57β — meaning LMAT is approximately 131% more volatile than ABT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 32% versus 47% for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

(LMAT) is pulling ahead at 13. 5% versus 4. 6% for Abbott Laboratories (ABT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Abbott Laboratories grew EPS 133. 6% year-over-year, compared to 30. 6% for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LMAT leads at 15. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the more profitable company, earning 31.

9% net margin versus 23. 1% for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LMAT leads at 27. 2% versus 16. 3% for ABT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LMAT leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 52x versus LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. 's 1. 96x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Abbott Laboratories (ABT) trades at 15. 7x forward P/E versus 38. 0x for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. — 22. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ABT: 49. 2% to $128. 71.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Abbott Laboratories (ABT) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 7% for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

(LMAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 0. 7% yield, +619. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMAT: +619. 5%, ABT: +171. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LMAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ABT is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.