LMAT vs ANGO

For growth investors, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

(LMAT) is the stronger pick with 13. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) offers the better valuation at 42. 8x trailing P/E (37. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LeMaitre Vascular, Inc. (LMAT) a "Buy" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

Over the past 5 years, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

(LMAT) delivered a total return of +118. 2%, compared to -53. 3% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LMAT returned +608. 6% versus ANGO's -9. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

(LMAT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 57β versus AngioDynamics, Inc. 's 1. 32β — meaning ANGO is approximately 131% more volatile than LMAT relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

(LMAT) is pulling ahead at 13. 5% versus -3. 8% for AngioDynamics, Inc. (ANGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AngioDynamics, Inc. grew EPS 81. 9% year-over-year, compared to 30. 6% for LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LMAT leads at 15. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

(LMAT) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 1% net margin versus -11. 6% for AngioDynamics, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LMAT leads at 27. 2% versus -13. 7% for ANGO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LMAT leads at 71. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ANGO: 46.

4% to $16. 50.

In this comparison, LMAT (0.

7% yield) pays a dividend. ANGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, LeMaitre Vascular, Inc.

(LMAT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 57), 0. 7% yield, +608. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LMAT: +608. 6%, ANGO: -9. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

LMAT pays a dividend while ANGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.