Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA) vs Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock (JCAP) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LMFA | 77.7% revenue growth vs JCAP's 34.1% |
| Quality / Margins | JCAP | 24.3% net margin vs LMFA's -66.5% |
| Stability / Safety | JCAP | Beta 1.36 vs LMFA's 1.82 |
| Dividends | JCAP | 3.0% yield; 1-year raise streak; LMFA pays no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | JCAP | +13.9% vs LMFA's -75.2% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | JCAP | 7.8% ROA vs LMFA's -12.3%, ROIC 12.6% vs -12.3% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
LM Funding America is a specialty finance company that purchases delinquent homeowner association assessment accounts from community associations. It generates revenue primarily by collecting on these purchased delinquent accounts — typically through payment plans or legal action — and earns interest and fees on the amounts recovered. The company's key advantage lies in its specialized expertise in HOA collections and its New Neighbor Guaranty program, which provides associations with upfront payments for delinquent accounts.
Jefferson Capital is a debt recovery company that purchases charged-off consumer receivables at deep discounts and works with individuals to collect repayments. It makes money primarily by buying distressed debt portfolios—including credit card, auto, telecom, and utility receivables—at steep discounts and collecting on them, supplemented by debt servicing fees for managing nonperforming loans for credit originators. The company's moat lies in its specialized expertise in valuing and collecting on distressed debt, its established relationships with credit originators, and its operational scale in managing large portfolios of charged-off receivables.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
JCAP leads in 4 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LMFA leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
Financial Metrics (TTM)
JCAP is the larger business by revenue, generating $433M annually — 39.4x LMFA's $11M. JCAP is the more profitable business, keeping 24.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LMFA's -66.5%.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JCAPJefferson Capital… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $11M | $433M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$264,638 | $137M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | $140M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$14M | $265M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | +71.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -58.7% | +50.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -66.5% | +24.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -124.4% | +37.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +100.0% | — |
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, LMFA's 7.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JCAP's 10.4x.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JCAPJefferson Capital… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6M | $1.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $10M | $2.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.14x | 11.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 7.29x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.70x | 10.40x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.53x | 2.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.03x | 3.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 7.42x |
Profitability & Efficiency
JCAP delivers a 32.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $-15 for LMFA. LMFA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.22x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JCAP's 3.12x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), JCAP scores 4/9 vs LMFA's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JCAPJefferson Capital… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -15.3% | +32.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.3% | +7.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.3% | +12.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.4% | +16.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.22x | 3.12x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $36M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -3.92x | 0.00x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in JCAP five years ago would be worth $11,386 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $78 for LMFA. Over the past 12 months, JCAP leads with a +13.9% total return vs LMFA's -75.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JCAP at 4.4% vs LMFA's -63.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JCAPJefferson Capital… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.8% | -6.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -75.2% | +13.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.3% | +13.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.2% | +13.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +20.2% | +13.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -63.8% | +4.4% |
Risk & Volatility
JCAP is the less volatile stock with a 1.36 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LMFA's 1.82 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. JCAP currently trades 86.7% from its 52-week high vs LMFA's 7.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JCAPJefferson Capital… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.82x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.14 | $23.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.29 | $15.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +7.3% | +86.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.0 | 45.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 372K | 301K |
Analyst Outlook
JCAP is the only dividend payer here at 2.99% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | LMFALM Funding Americ… | JCAPJefferson Capital… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $26.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.62 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LM Funding America,… (LMFA) | $7M | $11M | +58.0% |
| Jefferson Capital, … (JCAP) | $2M | $433M | +24759.4% |
LM Funding America, Inc.'s revenue grew from $7M (2015) to $11M (2024) — a 5.2% CAGR. Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock's revenue grew from $2M (2015) to $433M (2024) — a 84.6% CAGR.
Chart 2Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LM Funding America,… (LMFA) | 24.9% | -66.5% | -367.3% |
| Jefferson Capital, … (JCAP) | -168.8% | 24.3% | +114.4% |
LM Funding America, Inc.'s net margin went from 25% (2015) to -67% (2024). Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock's net margin went from -169% (2015) to 24% (2024).
Chart 3EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2015 | 2024 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| LM Funding America,… (LMFA) | -0.5 | -2.61 | -422.0% |
| Jefferson Capital, … (JCAP) | -0.65 | 1.81 | +378.5% |
LM Funding America, Inc.'s EPS grew from $-0.50 (2015) to $-2.61 (2024). Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock's EPS grew from $-0.65 (2015) to $1.81 (2024).
Chart 4Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
LM Funding America, Inc. generated $-14M FCF in 2024 (+7% vs 2021). Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock generated $162M FCF in 2024 (+36% vs 2023).
LMFA vs JCAP: Frequently Asked Questions
7 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LMFA or JCAP a better buy right now?
Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock (JCAP) offers the better valuation at 11.4x trailing P/E (7.3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock (JCAP) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LMFA or JCAP?
Over the past 5 years, Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock (JCAP) delivered a total return of +13.9%, compared to -99.2% for LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA). A $10,000 investment in JCAP five years ago would be worth approximately $11K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LMFA returned +20.2% versus JCAP's +13.9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LMFA or JCAP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock (JCAP) is the lower-risk stock at 1.36β versus LM Funding America, Inc.'s 1.82β — meaning LMFA is approximately 34% more volatile than JCAP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 22% versus 3% for Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which has better profit margins — LMFA or JCAP?
Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock (JCAP) is the more profitable company, earning 24.3% net margin versus -66.5% for LM Funding America, Inc. — meaning it keeps 24.3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: JCAP leads at 50.8% versus -58.7% for LMFA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — JCAP leads at 71.2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
05Which pays a better dividend — LMFA or JCAP?
In this comparison, JCAP (3.0% yield) pays a dividend. LMFA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
06Is LMFA or JCAP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Jefferson Capital, Inc. Common Stock (JCAP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (3.0% yield). LM Funding America, Inc. (LMFA) carries a higher beta of 1.82 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (JCAP: +13.9%, LMFA: +20.2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
07What are the main differences between LMFA and JCAP?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. In terms of investment character: LMFA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JCAP is a small-cap deep-value stock. JCAP pays a dividend while LMFA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.