Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LNAI vs CDNA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Diagnostics & Research
LNAI vs CDNA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Medical - Diagnostics & Research |
| Market Cap | $8M | $1.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $413M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-126M | $-8M |
| Gross Margin | — | 48.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -3.3% |
| Forward P/E | — | 22.8x |
| Total Debt | $10M | $20M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $93K | $65M |
Quick Verdict: LNAI vs CDNA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LNAI is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 0.79
- EPS growth -18.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, current ratio 0.04x
CDNA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 385.1% 10Y total return vs LNAI's -85.4%
- -2.0% margin vs LNAI's -7.4%
- +45.2% vs LNAI's -85.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 21.7% revenue growth vs CDNA's 13.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | -2.0% margin vs LNAI's -7.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs CDNA's 1.39 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +45.2% vs LNAI's -85.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.9% ROA vs LNAI's -18.8%, ROIC -5.7% vs -22.4% |
LNAI vs CDNA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LNAI vs CDNA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDNA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CDNA and LNAI operate at a comparable scale, with $413M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $413M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$126M | -$8M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $65M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +48.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -3.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -2.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +15.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +39.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +80.8% | +126.3% |
Valuation Metrics
CDNA leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8M | $1.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $18M | $1.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.03x | -53.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 22.85x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.92x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 3.77x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 30.66x |
Profitability & Efficiency
CDNA leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
CDNA delivers a -2.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-3 in annual profit, vs $-3 for LNAI. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CDNA scores 5/9 vs LNAI's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.2% | -2.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -18.8% | -1.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -22.4% | -5.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -33.2% | -5.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $10M | -$46M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $92,700 | $65M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $10M | $20M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -11.70x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CDNA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CDNA five years ago would be worth $2,759 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,461 for LNAI. Over the past 12 months, CDNA leads with a +45.2% total return vs LNAI's -85.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CDNA at 37.7% vs LNAI's -47.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -65.7% | +12.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -85.4% | +45.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.4% | +161.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.4% | -72.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -85.4% | +385.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -47.3% | +37.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LNAI and CDNA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNAI is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CDNA's 1.39 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CDNA currently trades 92.3% from its 52-week high vs LNAI's 13.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.79x | 1.39x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $2.45 | $23.24 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.15 | $10.96 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +13.6% | +92.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 43.6 | 56.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 25.9M | 667K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $24.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +7.9% |
CDNA leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
LNAI vs CDNA: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LNAI or CDNA a better buy right now?
Analysts rate CareDx, Inc (CDNA) a "Buy" — based on 13 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison.
The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LNAI or CDNA?
Over the past 5 years, CareDx, Inc (CDNA) delivered a total return of -72.
4%, compared to -85. 4% for Lunai Bioworks Inc. (LNAI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CDNA returned +385. 1% versus LNAI's -85. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LNAI or CDNA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lunai Bioworks Inc.
(LNAI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus CareDx, Inc's 1. 39β — meaning CDNA is approximately 76% more volatile than LNAI relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — LNAI or CDNA?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lunai Bioworks Inc.
grew EPS -18. 5% year-over-year, compared to -143. 0% for CareDx, Inc. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LNAI or CDNA?
Lunai Bioworks Inc.
(LNAI) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -5. 6% for CareDx, Inc — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNAI leads at 0. 0% versus -5. 5% for CDNA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CDNA leads at 67. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LNAI or CDNA?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is LNAI or CDNA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Lunai Bioworks Inc.
(LNAI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNAI: -85. 4%, CDNA: +385. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LNAI and CDNA?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.