Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LND vs ALCO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Agricultural Farm Products
LND vs ALCO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Agricultural Farm Products |
| Market Cap | $382M | $316M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $821M | $29M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-82M | $-142M |
| Gross Margin | 36.4% | -6.0% |
| Operating Margin | 9.3% | -7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 13.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $1.31B | $86M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $160M | $38M |
LND vs ALCO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| BrasilAgro - Compan… (LND) | 100 | 100.5 | +0.5% |
| Alico, Inc. (ALCO) | 100 | 128.7 | +28.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LND vs ALCO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LND carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 3.8%, EPS growth -39.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -8.2%
- 112.5% 10Y total return vs ALCO's 66.6%
- 3.8% revenue growth vs ALCO's -5.5%
ALCO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.34, yield 0.5%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.34, Low D/E 79.2%, current ratio 9.56x
- Beta 0.34, yield 0.5%, current ratio 9.56x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.8% revenue growth vs ALCO's -5.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | -10.0% margin vs ALCO's -487.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.34 vs LND's 0.50 | |
| Dividends | 8.2% yield, vs ALCO's 0.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +42.5% vs LND's +9.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -2.1% ROA vs ALCO's -72.7%, ROIC 2.1% vs -59.5% |
LND vs ALCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LND vs ALCO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LND leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LND is the larger business by revenue, generating $821M annually — 28.3x ALCO's $29M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -10.0% (LND) to -4.9% (ALCO). On growth, LND holds the edge at -57.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $821M | $29M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $150M | -$41M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$82M | -$142M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $74M | $19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.4% | -6.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +9.3% | -7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -10.0% | -4.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +9.0% | +66.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -57.1% | -88.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -97.3% | +62.5% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LND and ALCO each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $382M | $316M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $614M | $364M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 13.74x | -2.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 28.48x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.79x | 7.18x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.87x | 2.92x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 31.83x | 21.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LND leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LND delivers a -3.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-136 for ALCO. LND carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ALCO's 0.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ALCO scores 4/9 vs LND's 3/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | -135.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.1% | -72.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | -59.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.8% | -68.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 0.79x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.2B | -$35M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $160M | $38M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.3B | $86M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.10x | -57.14x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ALCO leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ALCO five years ago would be worth $14,558 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,511 for LND. Over the past 12 months, ALCO leads with a +42.5% total return vs LND's +9.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ALCO at 22.1% vs LND's 1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +7.0% | +12.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +9.4% | +42.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +3.2% | +82.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -4.9% | +45.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +112.5% | +66.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.1% | +22.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ALCO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ALCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LND's 0.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ALCO currently trades 92.1% from its 52-week high vs LND's 86.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.50x | 0.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.43 | $44.86 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.47 | $28.90 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +86.4% | +92.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.0 | 44.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 109K | 29K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — LND and ALCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
For income investors, LND offers the higher dividend yield at 8.21% vs ALCO's 0.48%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $45.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +8.2% | +0.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.56 | $0.20 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
LND leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ALCO leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
LND vs ALCO: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LND or ALCO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the stronger pick with 3.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 5% for Alico, Inc. (ALCO). BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Alico, Inc. (ALCO) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LND or ALCO?
Over the past 5 years, Alico, Inc.
(ALCO) delivered a total return of +45. 6%, compared to -4. 9% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LND returned +112. 5% versus ALCO's +66. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LND or ALCO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Alico, Inc.
(ALCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 34β versus BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas's 0. 50β — meaning LND is approximately 46% more volatile than ALCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 79% for Alico, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LND or ALCO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is pulling ahead at 3.
8% versus -5. 5% for Alico, Inc. (ALCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas grew EPS -39. 2% year-over-year, compared to -22. 2% for Alico, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LND leads at -8. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LND or ALCO?
BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the more profitable company, earning 13.
1% net margin versus -334. 3% for Alico, Inc. — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LND leads at 8. 4% versus -450. 5% for ALCO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LND leads at 20. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LND or ALCO?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) offers the highest yield at 8. 2%, versus 0. 5% for Alico, Inc. (ALCO).
07Is LND or ALCO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
50), 8. 2% yield, +112. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LND: +112. 5%, ALCO: +66. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LND and ALCO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LND is a small-cap deep-value stock; ALCO is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LND pays a dividend while ALCO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.