LND vs DE

For growth investors, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the stronger pick with 3.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Deere & Company (DE) a "Hold" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the cheapest at 13.

7x versus Deere & Company at 32. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, Deere & Company (DE) delivered a total return of +58.

7%, compared to -3. 9% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: DE returned +676. 6% versus LND's +109. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

50β versus Deere & Company's 0. 56β — meaning DE is approximately 14% more volatile than LND relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 2% for Deere & Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is pulling ahead at 3.

8% versus -2. 2% for Deere & Company (DE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Deere & Company grew EPS 0. 0% year-over-year, compared to -39. 2% for BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas. Over a 3-year CAGR, DE leads at -3. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) is the more profitable company, earning 13.

1% net margin versus 11. 3% for Deere & Company — meaning it keeps 13. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DE leads at 18. 8% versus 8. 4% for LND. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DE leads at 36. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

BrasilAgro - Companhia Brasileira de Propriedades Agrícolas (LND) offers the highest yield at 8. 2%, versus 1. 1% for Deere & Company (DE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Deere & Company (DE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

56), 1. 1% yield, +676. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (DE: +676. 6%, LND: +109. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (LND (Consumer Defensive) and DE (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LND is a small-cap deep-value stock; DE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.