Medical - Devices
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LNSR vs OMCL
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Healthcare Information Services
LNSR vs OMCL — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Medical - Devices | Medical - Healthcare Information Services |
| Market Cap | $63M | $1.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $58M | $1.23B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-34M | $20M |
| Gross Margin | 46.0% | 43.5% |
| Operating Margin | -42.1% | 2.7% |
| Forward P/E | 1341.0x | 22.4x |
| Total Debt | $3M | $204M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $13M | $197M |
LNSR vs OMCL — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LENSAR, Inc. (LNSR) | 100 | 53.6 | -46.4% |
| Omnicell, Inc. (OMCL) | 100 | 50.1 | -49.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LNSR vs OMCL
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LNSR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.52
- Rev growth 9.2%, EPS growth -5.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.52, current ratio 1.15x
OMCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 36.3% 10Y total return vs LNSR's -41.9%
- Lower P/E (22.4x vs 1341.0x)
- 1.7% margin vs LNSR's -58.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.2% revenue growth vs OMCL's 6.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.4x vs 1341.0x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.7% margin vs LNSR's -58.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.52 vs OMCL's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +75.9% vs LNSR's -62.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.0% ROA vs LNSR's -48.1% |
LNSR vs OMCL — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LNSR vs OMCL — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMCL leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
OMCL is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.2B annually — 21.0x LNSR's $58M. OMCL is the more profitable business, keeping 1.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LNSR's -58.7%. On growth, OMCL holds the edge at +14.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $58M | $1.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$20M | $111M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$34M | $20M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$15M | $112M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +46.0% | +43.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -42.1% | +2.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -58.7% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.5% | +9.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +14.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.5% | +2.7% |
Valuation Metrics
LNSR leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $63M | $2.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $53M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -1.82x | 978.10x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 1341.03x | 22.36x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 23.56x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 1.66x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 22.68x |
Profitability & Efficiency
OMCL leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), OMCL scores 7/9 vs LNSR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | +1.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -48.1% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +0.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -59.8% | +0.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$10M | $8M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $13M | $197M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3M | $204M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 18.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LNSR and OMCL each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNSR five years ago would be worth $7,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,062 for OMCL. Over the past 12 months, OMCL leads with a +75.9% total return vs LNSR's -62.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNSR at 24.2% vs OMCL's -12.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -55.0% | -4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -62.2% | +75.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +91.6% | -33.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -26.8% | -69.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -41.9% | +36.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +24.2% | -12.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LNSR and OMCL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNSR is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than OMCL's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. OMCL currently trades 78.8% from its 52-week high vs LNSR's 36.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.52x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.31 | $55.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.06 | $24.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +36.5% | +78.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.1 | 65.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 130K | 559K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LNSR as "Buy" and OMCL as "Hold".
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $57.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 19 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.9% |
OMCL leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LNSR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LNSR vs OMCL: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LNSR or OMCL a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LENSAR, Inc.
(LNSR) is the stronger pick with 9. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 6. 5% for Omnicell, Inc. (OMCL). Omnicell, Inc. (OMCL) offers the better valuation at 978. 1x trailing P/E (22. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LENSAR, Inc. (LNSR) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LNSR or OMCL?
On forward P/E, Omnicell, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 22. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LNSR or OMCL?
Over the past 5 years, LENSAR, Inc.
(LNSR) delivered a total return of -26. 8%, compared to -69. 4% for Omnicell, Inc. (OMCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: OMCL returned +36. 3% versus LNSR's -41. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LNSR or OMCL?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LENSAR, Inc.
(LNSR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 52β versus Omnicell, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning OMCL is approximately 156% more volatile than LNSR relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — LNSR or OMCL?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LENSAR, Inc.
(LNSR) is pulling ahead at 9. 2% versus 6. 5% for Omnicell, Inc. (OMCL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LENSAR, Inc. grew EPS -5. 1% year-over-year, compared to -83. 6% for Omnicell, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNSR leads at 18. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LNSR or OMCL?
Omnicell, Inc.
(OMCL) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 2% net margin versus -58. 7% for LENSAR, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: OMCL leads at 0. 4% versus -42. 1% for LNSR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNSR leads at 46. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LNSR or OMCL more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Omnicell, Inc.
(OMCL) trades at 22. 4x forward P/E versus 1341. 0x for LENSAR, Inc. — 1318. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — LNSR or OMCL?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LNSR or OMCL better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LENSAR, Inc.
(LNSR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 52)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNSR: -41. 9%, OMCL: +36. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LNSR and OMCL?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.