Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LNW vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
LNW vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $8.13B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.22B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $399M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 72.7% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $3.92B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $196M | $86.81B |
LNW vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) | 100 | 622.8 | +522.8% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 189.0 | +89.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LNW vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LNW has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.04
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 110.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs AMZN's 7.0%
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth and momentum.
- 12.4% revenue growth vs LNW's 9.9%
- +43.7% vs LNW's +4.6%
- 11.5% ROA vs LNW's 6.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs 11.6%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.4% revenue growth vs LNW's 9.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (15.9x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs AMZN's 12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs LNW's +4.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs LNW's 6.1%, ROIC 14.7% vs 11.6% |
LNW vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LNW vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 230.6x LNW's $3.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.4% (LNW) to 12.2% (AMZN). On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $399M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $389M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.7% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.1% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LNW leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.6x trailing earnings, LNW trades at a 30% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LNW's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.9B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.62x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.89x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.52x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.55x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.02x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.06x | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNW delivers a 55.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $55 in annual profit, vs $23 for AMZN. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LNW's 6.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNW scores 7/9 vs AMZN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +55.2% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.16x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $196M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.67x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNW five years ago would be worth $17,488 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,476 for AMZN. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs LNW's +4.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs LNW's 18.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.6% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.5% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.9% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1035.2% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LNW and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNW is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs LNW's 79.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.04x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $122.65 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.56 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 88K | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LNW as "Hold" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 109.2% upside for LNW (target: $205) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $205.00 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | 0.0% |
LNW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). AMZN leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
LNW vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LNW or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 9% for Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW). Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LNW or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Light & Wonder, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LNW or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) delivered a total return of +74. 9%, compared to +64. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNW returned +1035% versus AMZN's +697. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LNW or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 04β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 45% more volatile than LNW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 6% for Light & Wonder, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LNW or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 9. 9% for Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Light & Wonder, Inc. grew EPS 110. 3% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNW leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LNW or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus 10. 5% for Light & Wonder, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNW leads at 21. 0% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNW leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LNW or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 18. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LNW: 109. 2% to $205. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LNW or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LNW or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 04), +1035% 10Y return). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a higher beta of 1. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNW: +1035%, AMZN: +697. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LNW and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.