Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LNW
Light & Wonder, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$8.13B
5Y Perf.+522.8%
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.24B
5Y Perf.-55.0%
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.66B
5Y Perf.+105.4%
MGM
MGM Resorts International

Gambling, Resorts & Casinos

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$9.75B
5Y Perf.+112.4%

LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LNW logoLNW
PENN logoPENN
CZR logoCZR
MGM logoMGM
IndustryGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & CasinosGambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$8.13B$2.24B$5.66B$9.75B
Revenue (TTM)$3.22B$6.96B$11.56B$17.72B
Net Income (TTM)$399M$-843M$-485M$183M
Gross Margin72.7%30.6%43.9%44.2%
Operating Margin23.9%-7.9%17.8%5.2%
Forward P/E15.9x23.0x21.5x
Total Debt$3.92B$8.38B$26.34B$56.16B
Cash & Equiv.$196M$687M$887M$2.06B

LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGMLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LNW
PENN
CZR
MGM
StockMay 20Feb 26Return
Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW)100622.8+522.8%
PENN Entertainment,… (PENN)10045.0-55.0%
Caesars Entertainme… (CZR)100205.4+105.4%
MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM)100212.4+112.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LNW leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. MGM Resorts International is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LNW
Light & Wonder, Inc.
The Income Pick

LNW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.04
  • Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 110.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
  • 10.4% 10Y total return vs CZR's 302.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, current ratio 1.61x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

PENN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
The Secondary Option

CZR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: consumer cyclical exposure
MGM
MGM Resorts International
The Momentum Pick

MGM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +20.1% vs CZR's +2.5%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLNW logoLNW9.9% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7%
ValueLNW logoLNWBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsLNW logoLNW12.4% margin vs PENN's -12.1%
Stability / SafetyLNW logoLNWBeta 1.04 vs PENN's 1.34
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)MGM logoMGM+20.1% vs CZR's +2.5%
Efficiency (ROA)LNW logoLNW6.1% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 11.6% vs 1.8%

LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LNWLight & Wonder, Inc.
FY 2024
Service
66.0%$2.1B
Product
34.0%$1.1B
PENNPENN Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
76.9%$5.3B
Product and Service, Other
13.1%$912M
Food and Beverage
6.4%$446M
Occupancy
3.6%$253M
CZRCaesars Entertainment, Inc.
FY 2025
Casino
64.4%$6.6B
Hotel, Owned
18.9%$1.9B
Food and Beverage
16.7%$1.7B
MGMMGM Resorts International
FY 2025
Casino
53.9%$9.5B
Occupancy
19.3%$3.4B
Food And Beverage
17.4%$3.0B
Entertainment Retail And Other
9.5%$1.7B

LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLNWLAGGINGMGM

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 5.5x LNW's $3.2B. LNW is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, PENN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLNW logoLNWLight & Wonder, I…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.2B$7.0B$11.6B$17.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$1.2B-$105M$3.5B$2.0B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$399M-$843M-$485M$183M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$389M-$169M$538M$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+72.7%+30.6%+43.9%+44.2%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+23.9%-7.9%+17.8%+5.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+12.4%-12.1%-4.2%+1.0%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.1%-2.4%+4.7%+9.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.9%+8.2%+2.7%+4.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.1%+37.5%+11.1%-5.9%
LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — PENN and CZR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 26.6x trailing earnings, LNW trades at a 47% valuation discount to MGM's 50.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CZR's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MGM's 31.6x.

MetricLNW logoLNWLight & Wonder, I…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
Market CapShares × price$8.1B$2.2B$5.7B$9.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$11.9B$9.9B$31.1B$63.8B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS26.62x-2.88x-11.48x50.14x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.15.89x22.95x21.53x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple11.52x13.81x8.90x31.61x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.55x0.32x0.49x0.56x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share14.02x1.33x1.57x3.08x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF24.06x10.88x5.85x
Evenly matched — PENN and CZR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LNW leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

LNW delivers a 55.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $55 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. PENN carries lower financial leverage with a 4.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNW scores 7/9 vs MGM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLNW logoLNWLight & Wonder, I…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+55.2%-34.7%-12.6%+5.3%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.1%-5.7%-1.5%+0.4%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.6%+1.8%+5.4%+1.7%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+14.0%+2.0%+7.0%+2.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–97555
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage6.16x4.58x7.15x17.14x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$3.7B$7.7B$25.5B$54.1B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$196M$687M$887M$2.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$3.9B$8.4B$26.3B$56.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense2.67x-1.02x0.90x1.52x
LNW leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LNW five years ago would be worth $17,488 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, MGM leads with a +20.1% total return vs CZR's +2.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNW at 18.3% vs CZR's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLNW logoLNWLight & Wonder, I…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-4.9%+12.9%+17.9%+4.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+4.6%+6.7%+2.5%+20.1%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+65.5%-35.3%-38.6%-12.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+74.9%-80.6%-73.7%-4.5%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1035.2%+11.9%+302.6%+81.8%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+18.3%-13.5%-15.0%-4.3%
LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LNW and MGM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

LNW is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGM currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs LNW's 79.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLNW logoLNWLight & Wonder, I…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.12x1.31x1.24x1.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$122.65$20.61$31.58$40.94
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$69.56$11.65$17.95$29.19
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+79.9%+81.4%+88.0%+93.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10041.355.154.550.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded88K4.4M4.6M4.4M
Evenly matched — LNW and MGM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

LNW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: LNW as "Hold", PENN as "Buy", CZR as "Buy", MGM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 109.2% upside for LNW (target: $205) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40).

MetricLNW logoLNWLight & Wonder, I…PENN logoPENNPENN Entertainmen…CZR logoCZRCaesars Entertain…MGM logoMGMMGM Resorts Inter…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$205.00$19.88$30.57$39.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts13473036
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises300
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.7%+15.8%+4.0%+12.6%
LNW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

LNW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.

Best OverallLight & Wonder, Inc. (LNW)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Light & Wonder, Inc.

(LNW) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?

On trailing P/E, Light & Wonder, Inc.

(LNW) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus MGM Resorts International at 50. 1x. On forward P/E, Light & Wonder, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?

Over the past 5 years, Light & Wonder, Inc.

(LNW) delivered a total return of +74. 9%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNW returned +1035% versus PENN's +11. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Light & Wonder, Inc.

(LNW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning PENN is approximately 17% more volatile than LNW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Light & Wonder, Inc.

(LNW) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Light & Wonder, Inc. grew EPS 110. 3% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNW leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?

Light & Wonder, Inc.

(LNW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 5% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNW leads at 21. 0% versus 3. 9% for PENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNW leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Light & Wonder, Inc.

(LNW) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LNW: 109. 2% to $205. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Light & Wonder, Inc.

(LNW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +1035% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNW: +1035%, PENN: +11. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LNW and PENN and CZR and MGM?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LNW

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PENN

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CZR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MGM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 26%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LNW and PENN and CZR and MGM on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LNW: 2.9% · PENN: 8.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.