Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $8.13B | $2.24B | $5.66B | $9.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.22B | $6.96B | $11.56B | $17.72B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $399M | $-843M | $-485M | $183M |
| Gross Margin | 72.7% | 30.6% | 43.9% | 44.2% |
| Operating Margin | 23.9% | -7.9% | 17.8% | 5.2% |
| Forward P/E | 15.9x | 23.0x | — | 21.5x |
| Total Debt | $3.92B | $8.38B | $26.34B | $56.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $196M | $687M | $887M | $2.06B |
LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | Feb 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) | 100 | 622.8 | +522.8% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 45.0 | -55.0% |
| Caesars Entertainme… (CZR) | 100 | 205.4 | +105.4% |
| MGM Resorts Interna… (MGM) | 100 | 212.4 | +112.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LNW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.04
- Rev growth 9.9%, EPS growth 110.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.0%
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs CZR's 302.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.04, current ratio 1.61x
PENN plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
CZR lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
MGM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.
- +20.1% vs CZR's +2.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 9.9% revenue growth vs MGM's 1.7% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.4% margin vs PENN's -12.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.04 vs PENN's 1.34 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +20.1% vs CZR's +2.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.1% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 11.6% vs 1.8% |
LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LNW leads in 4 of 6 categories
PENN leads 0 • CZR leads 0 • MGM leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MGM is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.7B annually — 5.5x LNW's $3.2B. LNW is the more profitable business, keeping 12.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, PENN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.2B | $7.0B | $11.6B | $17.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.2B | -$105M | $3.5B | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $399M | -$843M | -$485M | $183M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $389M | -$169M | $538M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +72.7% | +30.6% | +43.9% | +44.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.9% | -7.9% | +17.8% | +5.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.4% | -12.1% | -4.2% | +1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | -2.4% | +4.7% | +9.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.9% | +8.2% | +2.7% | +4.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.1% | +37.5% | +11.1% | -5.9% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — PENN and CZR each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 26.6x trailing earnings, LNW trades at a 47% valuation discount to MGM's 50.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CZR's 8.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MGM's 31.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.1B | $2.2B | $5.7B | $9.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $11.9B | $9.9B | $31.1B | $63.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 26.62x | -2.88x | -11.48x | 50.14x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.89x | 22.95x | — | 21.53x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.52x | 13.81x | 8.90x | 31.61x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.55x | 0.32x | 0.49x | 0.56x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 14.02x | 1.33x | 1.57x | 3.08x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 24.06x | — | 10.88x | 5.85x |
Profitability & Efficiency
LNW leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LNW delivers a 55.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $55 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. PENN carries lower financial leverage with a 4.58x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MGM's 17.14x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LNW scores 7/9 vs MGM's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +55.2% | -34.7% | -12.6% | +5.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.1% | -5.7% | -1.5% | +0.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.6% | +1.8% | +5.4% | +1.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +14.0% | +2.0% | +7.0% | +2.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.16x | 4.58x | 7.15x | 17.14x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.7B | $7.7B | $25.5B | $54.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $196M | $687M | $887M | $2.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $8.4B | $26.3B | $56.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 2.67x | -1.02x | 0.90x | 1.52x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LNW leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LNW five years ago would be worth $17,488 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, MGM leads with a +20.1% total return vs CZR's +2.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LNW at 18.3% vs CZR's -15.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -4.9% | +12.9% | +17.9% | +4.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +4.6% | +6.7% | +2.5% | +20.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +65.5% | -35.3% | -38.6% | -12.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.9% | -80.6% | -73.7% | -4.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1035.2% | +11.9% | +302.6% | +81.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.3% | -13.5% | -15.0% | -4.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LNW and MGM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LNW is the less volatile stock with a 1.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MGM currently trades 93.1% from its 52-week high vs LNW's 79.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.12x | 1.31x | 1.24x | 1.24x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $122.65 | $20.61 | $31.58 | $40.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $69.56 | $11.65 | $17.95 | $29.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +79.9% | +81.4% | +88.0% | +93.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 41.3 | 55.1 | 54.5 | 50.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 88K | 4.4M | 4.6M | 4.4M |
Analyst Outlook
LNW leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LNW as "Hold", PENN as "Buy", CZR as "Buy", MGM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 109.2% upside for LNW (target: $205) vs 4.2% for MGM (target: $40).
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $205.00 | $19.88 | $30.57 | $39.71 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 13 | 47 | 30 | 36 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.7% | +15.8% | +4.0% | +12.6% |
LNW leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
LNW vs PENN vs CZR vs MGM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the stronger pick with 9. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). Light & Wonder, Inc. (LNW) offers the better valuation at 26. 6x trailing P/E (15. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) a "Buy" — based on 47 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?
On trailing P/E, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the cheapest at 26. 6x versus MGM Resorts International at 50. 1x. On forward P/E, Light & Wonder, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?
Over the past 5 years, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) delivered a total return of +74. 9%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LNW returned +1035% versus PENN's +11. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 12β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 31β — meaning PENN is approximately 17% more volatile than LNW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 17% for MGM Resorts International — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is pulling ahead at 9. 9% versus 1. 7% for MGM Resorts International (MGM). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Light & Wonder, Inc. grew EPS 110. 3% year-over-year, compared to -184. 4% for PENN Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LNW leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?
Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 5% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 10. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LNW leads at 21. 0% versus 3. 9% for PENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LNW leads at 70. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) trades at 15. 9x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LNW: 109. 2% to $205. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LNW or PENN or CZR or MGM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Light & Wonder, Inc.
(LNW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 12), +1035% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LNW: +1035%, PENN: +11. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LNW and PENN and CZR and MGM?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.