Agricultural Farm Products
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LOCL vs AREC vs METC vs AMR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Coal
Coal
Coal
LOCL vs AREC vs METC vs AMR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Agricultural Farm Products | Coal | Coal | Coal |
| Market Cap | $14M | $230M | $735M | $2.52B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $145K | $537M | $2.15B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-122M | $-38M | $-51M | $-36.83B |
| Gross Margin | 2.4% | 96.6% | 2.5% | 0.0% |
| Operating Margin | -135.7% | -203.0% | -10.4% | -2.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 20.0x |
| Total Debt | $437M | $221M | $18M | $6M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $937K | $604K | $440M | $482M |
LOCL vs AREC vs METC vs AMR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Local Bounti Corpor… (LOCL) | 100 | 1.3 | -98.7% |
| American Resources … (AREC) | 100 | 70.7 | -29.3% |
| Ramaco Resources, I… (METC) | 100 | 364.7 | +264.7% |
| Alpha Metallurgical… (AMR) | 100 | 1599.9 | +1499.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LOCL vs AREC vs METC vs AMR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LOCL carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 38.4%, EPS growth 9.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 291.0%
- 38.4% revenue growth vs AREC's -97.1%
- Beta 0.87 vs AREC's 2.48
AREC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 2.48, yield 0.8%
- 0.8% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs METC's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +165.2% vs LOCL's -33.5%
METC is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.
- Beta 1.07, yield 0.6%, current ratio 5.46x
AMR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 13.2% 10Y total return vs AREC's 127.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.92, Low D/E 0.4%, current ratio 4.13x
- -1.7% margin vs AREC's -262.0%
- -1.6% ROA vs LOCL's -29.2%, ROIC 13.7% vs -13.2%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 38.4% revenue growth vs AREC's -97.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | -1.7% margin vs AREC's -262.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.87 vs AREC's 2.48 | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs METC's 0.6%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +165.2% vs LOCL's -33.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | -1.6% ROA vs LOCL's -29.2%, ROIC 13.7% vs -13.2% |
LOCL vs AREC vs METC vs AMR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LOCL vs AREC vs METC vs AMR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMR leads in 3 of 6 categories
METC leads 1 • AREC leads 1 • LOCL leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMR is the larger business by revenue, generating $2.1B annually — 14792.9x AREC's $145,025. AMR is the more profitable business, keeping -1.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AREC's -262.0%. On growth, AMR holds the edge at +3445.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $145,025 | $537M | $2.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$39M | -$24M | $13M | -$19.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$122M | -$38M | -$51M | -$36.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$48M | -$7M | -$67M | $4.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +2.4% | +96.6% | +2.5% | +0.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -135.7% | -203.0% | -10.4% | -2.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -262.0% | -9.6% | -1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -104.1% | -48.0% | -12.5% | +0.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +19.1% | -78.7% | -25.1% | +3445.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +70.6% | +56.5% | -5.1% | -7.4% |
Valuation Metrics
METC leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMR's 5.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than METC's 25.6x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $14M | $230M | $735M | $2.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $450M | $450M | $312M | $2.0B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.11x | -4.37x | -14.34x | 13.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 20.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 25.60x | 5.08x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.37x | 600.58x | 1.37x | 0.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | — | 1.52x | 1.53x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | 6.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMR leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMR delivers a -2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-2 in annual profit, vs $-11 for METC. AMR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to METC's 0.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMR scores 6/9 vs AREC's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | — | -10.6% | -2.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -29.2% | -18.8% | -4.5% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -13.2% | -35.8% | -17.0% | +13.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -16.3% | -61.3% | -7.1% | +10.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 0.04x | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $436M | $220M | -$423M | -$476M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $937,000 | $604,485 | $440M | $482M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $437M | $221M | $18M | $6M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.62x | -2.41x | -7.17x | 59.79x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMR leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMR five years ago would be worth $150,978 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $127 for LOCL. Over the past 12 months, AREC leads with a +165.2% total return vs LOCL's -33.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors METC at 16.3% vs LOCL's -35.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -25.5% | -16.5% | -21.1% | -4.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -33.5% | +165.2% | +52.5% | +53.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -73.1% | +50.3% | +57.4% | +22.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | -25.3% | +306.1% | +1409.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.7% | +127.0% | +21.4% | +1320.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -35.4% | +14.6% | +16.3% | +7.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LOCL and AMR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LOCL is the less volatile stock with a 0.87 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AREC's 2.48 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMR currently trades 76.2% from its 52-week high vs METC's 25.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.87x | 2.48x | 1.07x | 0.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.00 | $7.11 | $57.80 | $253.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.98 | $0.61 | $8.21 | $97.41 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.3% | +31.9% | +25.6% | +76.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.6 | 51.2 | 58.3 | 52.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.7M | 2.5M | 1.8M | 280K |
Analyst Outlook
AREC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: AREC as "Buy", METC as "Buy", AMR as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 208.4% upside for AREC (target: $7) vs -2.0% for AMR (target: $190). For income investors, AREC offers the higher dividend yield at 0.78% vs AMR's 0.12%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $7.00 | $20.83 | $189.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 9 | 4 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +0.6% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.02 | $0.09 | $0.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | +4.9% |
AMR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). METC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
LOCL vs AREC vs METC vs AMR: Key Questions Answered
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LOCL or AREC or METC or AMR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is the stronger pick with 38.
4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -97. 1% for American Resources Corporation (AREC). Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (20. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate American Resources Corporation (AREC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LOCL or AREC or METC or AMR?
Over the past 5 years, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
(AMR) delivered a total return of +1410%, compared to -98. 7% for Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMR returned +1321% versus LOCL's -98. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LOCL or AREC or METC or AMR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
87β versus American Resources Corporation's 2. 48β — meaning AREC is approximately 183% more volatile than LOCL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc. (AMR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 4% for Ramaco Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LOCL or AREC or METC or AMR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Local Bounti Corporation (LOCL) is pulling ahead at 38.
4% versus -97. 1% for American Resources Corporation (AREC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Local Bounti Corporation grew EPS 9. 4% year-over-year, compared to -590. 5% for Ramaco Resources, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LOCL leads at 291. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LOCL or AREC or METC or AMR?
Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
(AMR) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 3% net margin versus -104. 7% for American Resources Corporation — meaning it keeps 6. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMR leads at 7. 7% versus -86. 3% for AREC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMR leads at 11. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is LOCL or AREC or METC or AMR more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for AREC: 208.
4% to $7. 00.
07Which pays a better dividend — LOCL or AREC or METC or AMR?
In this comparison, AREC (0.
8% yield), METC (0. 6% yield), AMR (0. 1% yield) pay a dividend. LOCL does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is LOCL or AREC or METC or AMR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Alpha Metallurgical Resources, Inc.
(AMR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 92), +1321% 10Y return). American Resources Corporation (AREC) carries a higher beta of 2. 48 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMR: +1321%, AREC: +127. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between LOCL and AREC and METC and AMR?
These companies operate in different sectors (LOCL (Consumer Defensive) and AREC (Energy) and METC (Energy) and AMR (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LOCL is a small-cap high-growth stock; AREC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; METC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMR is a small-cap deep-value stock. AREC, METC pay a dividend while LOCL, AMR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.