Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LPG vs INSW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
LPG vs INSW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.70B | $4.46B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $401M | $676M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $121M | $546M |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | 40.6% |
| Operating Margin | 35.0% | 44.4% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 8.5x |
| Total Debt | $713M | $576M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $317M | $117M |
LPG vs INSW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) | 100 | 484.3 | +384.3% |
| International Seawa… (INSW) | 100 | 397.6 | +297.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPG vs INSW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LPG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.98, yield 9.3%
- 9.3% yield, vs INSW's 3.2%
INSW carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth -11.4%, EPS growth -25.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.8%
- 10.1% 10Y total return vs LPG's 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 28.5%, current ratio 3.71x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -11.4% revenue growth vs LPG's -37.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.5x vs 9.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 80.8% margin vs LPG's 30.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs LPG's 0.98, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 9.3% yield, vs INSW's 3.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +160.2% vs LPG's +97.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 20.1% ROA vs LPG's 6.8%, ROIC 9.4% vs 5.7% |
LPG vs INSW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LPG vs INSW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LPG and INSW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
INSW is the larger business by revenue, generating $676M annually — 1.7x LPG's $401M. INSW is the more profitable business, keeping 80.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LPG's 30.1%. On growth, LPG holds the edge at +48.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $401M | $676M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $211M | $465M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $121M | $546M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $165M | $193M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.1% | +40.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | +44.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +80.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +28.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.7% | -91.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +122.0% | +4.8% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — LPG and INSW each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.5x trailing earnings, INSW trades at a 22% valuation discount to LPG's 18.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, INSW's 10.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LPG's 11.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $4.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $4.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.60x | 14.48x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.21x | 8.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 13.80x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.51x | 10.48x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.82x | 5.29x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.60x | 2.21x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.05x | 117.08x |
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
INSW delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $11 for LPG. INSW carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LPG's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), INSW scores 6/9 vs LPG's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +27.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +20.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +9.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +12.1% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.29x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $396M | $459M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $317M | $117M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $713M | $576M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.77x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
INSW leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in INSW five years ago would be worth $53,809 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $41,368 for LPG. Over the past 12 months, INSW leads with a +160.2% total return vs LPG's +97.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors INSW at 40.9% vs LPG's 30.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.7% | +96.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.7% | +160.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.0% | +179.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +313.7% | +438.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +506.8% | +1014.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.1% | +40.9% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LPG and INSW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
INSW is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPG's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.32 | $91.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.03 | $35.60 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +98.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 489K | 597K |
Analyst Outlook
LPG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LPG as "Buy" and INSW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.5% upside for LPG (target: $42) vs -7.6% for INSW (target: $83). For income investors, LPG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.32% vs INSW's 3.23%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.00 | $83.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 13 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +3.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.71 | $2.92 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | 0.0% |
INSW leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LPG leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 3 tied.
LPG vs INSW: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPG or INSW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger pick with -11. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 0% for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LPG or INSW?
On trailing P/E, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus Dorian LPG Ltd. at 18. 6x. On forward P/E, International Seaways, Inc. is actually cheaper at 8. 5x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LPG or INSW?
Over the past 5 years, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) delivered a total return of +438. 1%, compared to +313. 7% for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: INSW returned +1015% versus LPG's +506. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LPG or INSW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 43β versus Dorian LPG Ltd. 's 0. 98β — meaning LPG is approximately 128% more volatile than INSW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, International Seaways, Inc. (INSW) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 68% for Dorian LPG Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LPG or INSW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is pulling ahead at -11. 4% versus -37. 0% for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: International Seaways, Inc. grew EPS -25. 7% year-over-year, compared to -71. 8% for Dorian LPG Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LPG leads at 8. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LPG or INSW?
International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 7% net margin versus 25. 5% for Dorian LPG Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: INSW leads at 36. 3% versus 31. 9% for LPG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LPG leads at 43. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LPG or INSW more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) trades at 8. 5x forward P/E versus 9. 2x for Dorian LPG Ltd. — 0. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LPG: 5. 5% to $42. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LPG or INSW?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 3. 2% for International Seaways, Inc. (INSW).
09Is LPG or INSW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, International Seaways, Inc.
(INSW) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 43), 3. 2% yield, +1015% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (INSW: +1015%, LPG: +506. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LPG and INSW?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LPG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; INSW is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.