Oil & Gas Midstream
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LPG vs NVGS vs CLCO vs STNG vs TRMD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
Marine Shipping
Oil & Gas Midstream
Oil & Gas Midstream
LPG vs NVGS vs CLCO vs STNG vs TRMD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream | Marine Shipping | Oil & Gas Midstream | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $1.70B | $1.49B | $511M | $4.38B | $3.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $401M | $576M | $331M | $1.04B | $1.29B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $121M | $109M | $59M | $502M | $277M |
| Gross Margin | 50.1% | 35.9% | 61.8% | 51.8% | 47.2% |
| Operating Margin | 35.0% | 25.1% | 43.1% | 38.8% | 26.6% |
| Forward P/E | 9.2x | 14.1x | 12.1x | 8.6x | 6.6x |
| Total Debt | $713M | $903M | $1.31B | $619M | $1.23B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $317M | $205M | $165M | $752M | $272M |
LPG vs NVGS vs CLCO vs STNG vs TRMD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 23 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) | 100 | 199.6 | +99.6% |
| Navigator Holdings … (NVGS) | 100 | 163.4 | +63.4% |
| Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO) | 100 | 80.2 | -19.8% |
| Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) | 100 | 150.4 | +50.4% |
| TORM plc (TRMD) | 100 | 106.4 | +6.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LPG vs NVGS vs CLCO vs STNG vs TRMD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LPG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NVGS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 3.6%, EPS growth 23.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 7.4%
- PEG 0.09 vs LPG's 13.80
- 3.6% revenue growth vs LPG's -37.0%
- Better valuation composite
CLCO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.16, yield 14.2%
- Beta 0.16 vs LPG's 0.98
STNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 19.4%, current ratio 9.33x
- Beta 0.28, yield 2.0%, current ratio 9.33x
- 48.4% margin vs CLCO's 17.8%
- 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TRMD's 16.6%
TRMD is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 5.9% 10Y total return vs LPG's 5.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 3.6% revenue growth vs LPG's -37.0% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 48.4% margin vs CLCO's 17.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.16 vs LPG's 0.98 | |
| Dividends | 2.0% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs TRMD's 16.6% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +115.3% vs CLCO's +62.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.6% ROA vs CLCO's 2.6%, ROIC 7.2% vs 6.7% |
LPG vs NVGS vs CLCO vs STNG vs TRMD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
LPG vs NVGS vs CLCO vs STNG vs TRMD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
TRMD leads in 1 of 6 categories
STNG leads 1 • LPG leads 0 • NVGS leads 0 • CLCO leads 0 • 4 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LPG and CLCO and STNG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRMD is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.3B annually — 3.9x CLCO's $331M. STNG is the more profitable business, keeping 48.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CLCO's 17.8%. On growth, LPG holds the edge at +48.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $401M | $576M | $331M | $1.0B | $1.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $211M | $271M | $222M | $580M | $555M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $121M | $109M | $59M | $502M | $277M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $165M | $141M | -$348M | $389M | $242M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +50.1% | +35.9% | +61.8% | +51.8% | +47.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +35.0% | +25.1% | +43.1% | +38.8% | +26.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +18.8% | +17.8% | +48.4% | +21.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +41.2% | +24.4% | -105.0% | +37.5% | +18.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +48.7% | -7.1% | +9.9% | +46.2% | -7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +122.0% | +38.5% | -100.0% | +2.5% | -43.0% |
Valuation Metrics
TRMD leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, TRMD trades at a 72% valuation discount to LPG's 18.6x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVGS offers better value at 0.10x vs LPG's 13.80x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $1.7B | $1.5B | $511M | $4.4B | $3.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $2.2B | $1.7B | $4.3B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 18.60x | 15.56x | 5.31x | 12.05x | 5.21x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.21x | 14.12x | 12.09x | 8.58x | 6.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 13.80x | 0.10x | — | 0.36x | 0.23x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.51x | 7.97x | 7.41x | 8.68x | 5.07x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.82x | 2.54x | 1.59x | 4.67x | 2.15x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.60x | 1.24x | 0.68x | 1.30x | 1.54x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.05x | 22.65x | — | 8.92x | 14.38x |
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
STNG delivers a 15.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $16 in annual profit, vs $7 for CLCO. STNG carries lower financial leverage with a 0.19x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLCO's 1.72x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NVGS scores 6/9 vs TRMD's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +11.1% | +8.7% | +7.5% | +15.9% | +12.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.8% | +4.7% | +2.6% | +12.6% | +8.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.7% | +5.7% | +6.7% | +7.2% | +18.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +7.2% | +8.7% | +8.4% | +22.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.68x | 0.72x | 1.72x | 0.19x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $396M | $698M | $1.1B | -$133M | $954M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $317M | $205M | $165M | $752M | $272M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $713M | $903M | $1.3B | $619M | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.77x | 2.88x | 1.36x | 6.82x | 4.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LPG and STNG and TRMD each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in TRMD five years ago would be worth $53,512 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,188 for CLCO. Over the past 12 months, STNG leads with a +115.3% total return vs CLCO's +62.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LPG at 30.1% vs CLCO's 2.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +63.7% | +32.2% | +0.3% | +71.3% | +70.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +97.7% | +74.9% | +62.5% | +115.3% | +113.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +120.0% | +82.1% | +6.2% | +92.7% | +57.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +313.7% | +100.5% | +1.9% | +359.0% | +435.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +506.8% | +60.0% | +1.9% | +62.8% | +585.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.1% | +22.1% | +2.0% | +24.4% | +16.3% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LPG and CLCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CLCO is the less volatile stock with a 0.16 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LPG's 0.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LPG currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs TRMD's 94.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.98x | 0.63x | 0.16x | 0.28x | 0.54x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $40.32 | $23.22 | $10.00 | $87.39 | $34.88 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $20.03 | $12.91 | $5.78 | $37.96 | $15.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.7% | +98.5% | +96.7% | +96.9% | +94.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.5 | 75.0 | 41.8 | 60.5 | 62.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 489K | 452K | 104K | 1.2M | 924K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — STNG and TRMD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LPG as "Buy", NVGS as "Buy", CLCO as "Hold", STNG as "Buy", TRMD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 5.7% upside for TRMD (target: $35) vs 0.6% for NVGS (target: $23). For income investors, TRMD offers the higher dividend yield at 16.56% vs NVGS's 0.95%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $42.00 | $23.00 | — | $85.33 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 9 | 10 | 1 | 31 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +9.3% | +0.9% | +14.2% | +2.0% | +16.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.71 | $0.22 | $1.38 | $1.69 | $5.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.4% | +4.2% | 0.0% | +0.0% | 0.0% |
TRMD leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). STNG leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 4 tied.
LPG vs NVGS vs CLCO vs STNG vs TRMD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LPG or NVGS or CLCO or STNG or TRMD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Navigator Holdings Ltd.
(NVGS) is the stronger pick with 3. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -37. 0% for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). TORM plc (TRMD) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (6. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG) a "Buy" — based on 9 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LPG or NVGS or CLCO or STNG or TRMD?
On trailing P/E, TORM plc (TRMD) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus Dorian LPG Ltd. at 18. 6x. On forward P/E, TORM plc is actually cheaper at 6. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Navigator Holdings Ltd. wins at 0. 09x versus Dorian LPG Ltd. 's 13. 80x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LPG or NVGS or CLCO or STNG or TRMD?
Over the past 5 years, TORM plc (TRMD) delivered a total return of +435.
1%, compared to +1. 9% for Cool Company Ltd. (CLCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRMD returned +585. 5% versus CLCO's +1. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LPG or NVGS or CLCO or STNG or TRMD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Cool Company Ltd.
(CLCO) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus Dorian LPG Ltd. 's 0. 98β — meaning LPG is approximately 508% more volatile than CLCO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Scorpio Tankers Inc. (STNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 19% versus 172% for Cool Company Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LPG or NVGS or CLCO or STNG or TRMD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Navigator Holdings Ltd.
(NVGS) is pulling ahead at 3. 6% versus -37. 0% for Dorian LPG Ltd. (LPG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Navigator Holdings Ltd. grew EPS 23. 5% year-over-year, compared to -71. 8% for Dorian LPG Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, TRMD leads at 36. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LPG or NVGS or CLCO or STNG or TRMD?
TORM plc (TRMD) is the more profitable company, earning 39.
3% net margin versus 17. 1% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. — meaning it keeps 39. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLCO leads at 50. 5% versus 23. 9% for NVGS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CLCO leads at 76. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LPG or NVGS or CLCO or STNG or TRMD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 09x versus Dorian LPG Ltd. 's 13. 80x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, TORM plc (TRMD) trades at 6. 6x forward P/E versus 14. 1x for Navigator Holdings Ltd. — 7. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRMD: 5. 7% to $35. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LPG or NVGS or CLCO or STNG or TRMD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TORM plc (TRMD) offers the highest yield at 16. 6%, versus 0. 9% for Navigator Holdings Ltd. (NVGS).
09Is LPG or NVGS or CLCO or STNG or TRMD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TORM plc (TRMD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
54), 16. 6% yield, +585. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRMD: +585. 5%, LPG: +506. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LPG and NVGS and CLCO and STNG and TRMD?
These companies operate in different sectors (LPG (Energy) and NVGS (Energy) and CLCO (Industrials) and STNG (Energy) and TRMD (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LPG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; NVGS is a small-cap deep-value stock; CLCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; STNG is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.