Education & Training Services
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LRN vs WMT vs TGT vs PRDO
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Discount Stores
Education & Training Services
LRN vs WMT vs TGT vs PRDO — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Education & Training Services | Specialty Retail | Discount Stores | Education & Training Services |
| Market Cap | $3.90B | $1.04T | $57.36B | $2.16B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.54B | $703.06B | $106.25B | $855M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $308M | $22.91B | $4.04B | $170M |
| Gross Margin | 38.3% | 24.9% | 27.3% | 51.8% |
| Operating Margin | 15.8% | 4.1% | 5.3% | 24.3% |
| Forward P/E | 13.0x | 44.7x | 15.7x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $550M | $67.09B | $5.59B | $105M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $782M | $10.73B | $5.49B | $132M |
LRN vs WMT vs TGT vs PRDO — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stride, Inc. (LRN) | 100 | 372.4 | +272.4% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 314.9 | +214.9% |
| Target Corporation (TGT) | 100 | 102.9 | +2.9% |
| Perdoceo Education … (PRDO) | 100 | 211.5 | +111.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LRN vs WMT vs TGT vs PRDO
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LRN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 26.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 12.6%
- 6.7% 10Y total return vs PRDO's 5.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 37.2%, current ratio 5.39x
- PEG 0.22 vs WMT's 4.06
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.12, yield 0.7%
- Beta 0.12 vs TGT's 0.95
TGT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if dividends and momentum is your priority.
- 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
- +36.6% vs LRN's -42.3%
PRDO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for defensive.
- Beta 0.48, yield 1.6%, current ratio 5.06x
- 24.2% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7%
- Lower P/E (12.0x vs 15.7x)
- 19.9% margin vs WMT's 3.3%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 24.2% revenue growth vs TGT's -1.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 15.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 19.9% margin vs WMT's 3.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.12 vs TGT's 0.95 | |
| Dividends | 3.6% yield, 22-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +36.6% vs LRN's -42.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 13.2% ROA vs TGT's 6.9%, ROIC 15.3% vs 16.7% |
LRN vs WMT vs TGT vs PRDO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LRN vs WMT vs TGT vs PRDO — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRDO leads in 3 of 6 categories
LRN leads 1 • WMT leads 1 • TGT leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRDO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $703.1B annually — 822.5x PRDO's $855M. PRDO is the more profitable business, keeping 19.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WMT's 3.3%. On growth, WMT holds the edge at +5.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.5B | $703.1B | $106.2B | $855M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $525M | $42.8B | $8.7B | $247M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $308M | $22.9B | $4.0B | $170M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $400M | $15.3B | $2.9B | $221M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.3% | +24.9% | +27.3% | +51.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +4.1% | +5.3% | +24.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.2% | +3.3% | +3.8% | +19.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +15.8% | +2.2% | +2.8% | +25.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.7% | +5.8% | +3.2% | +4.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -7.4% | +35.1% | +23.7% | +30.8% |
Valuation Metrics
PRDO leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.2x trailing earnings, PRDO trades at a 70% valuation discount to WMT's 47.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LRN offers better value at 0.26x vs WMT's 4.33x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.9B | $1.04T | $57.4B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.7B | $1.09T | $57.5B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.41x | 47.69x | 15.49x | 14.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 13.02x | 44.71x | 15.74x | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.26x | 4.33x | — | 2.09x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.73x | 24.85x | 7.26x | 8.97x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.62x | 1.46x | 0.55x | 2.55x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.00x | 10.45x | 3.55x | 2.34x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.47x | 24.97x | 20.23x | 9.97x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PRDO leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TGT delivers a 26.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $26 in annual profit, vs $17 for PRDO. PRDO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.11x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.67x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LRN scores 7/9 vs TGT's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +19.9% | +22.3% | +26.1% | +17.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +13.1% | +7.9% | +6.9% | +13.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +22.0% | +14.7% | +16.7% | +15.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +19.6% | +17.5% | +13.6% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.37x | 0.67x | 0.35x | 0.11x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$233M | $56.4B | $104M | -$27M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $782M | $10.7B | $5.5B | $132M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $550M | $67.1B | $5.6B | $105M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 36.09x | 11.85x | 12.40x | 50.21x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LRN leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LRN five years ago would be worth $32,308 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,838 for TGT. Over the past 12 months, TGT leads with a +36.6% total return vs LRN's -42.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PRDO at 43.5% vs TGT's -3.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +41.9% | +15.7% | +26.4% | +18.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -42.3% | +32.7% | +36.6% | +15.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +122.2% | +160.5% | -11.0% | +195.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +223.1% | +186.9% | -31.6% | +198.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +666.0% | +499.5% | +99.5% | +505.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +30.5% | +37.6% | -3.8% | +43.5% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a 0.12 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TGT's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 96.7% from its 52-week high vs LRN's 53.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.46x | 0.12x | 0.95x | 0.48x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $171.17 | $134.69 | $133.07 | $38.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $60.61 | $91.89 | $83.44 | $26.66 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.6% | +96.7% | +94.6% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.4 | 55.9 | 61.4 | 46.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 744K | 17.2M | 4.5M | 584K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and TGT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LRN as "Hold", WMT as "Buy", TGT as "Hold", PRDO as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 19.4% upside for LRN (target: $110) vs -12.9% for PRDO (target: $30). For income investors, TGT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.58% vs WMT's 0.72%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $109.50 | $137.04 | $115.31 | $30.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 17 | 64 | 59 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% | +3.6% | +1.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 37 | 22 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $4.51 | $0.56 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.5% | +0.8% | +0.7% | +5.6% |
PRDO leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LRN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
LRN vs WMT vs TGT vs PRDO: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LRN or WMT or TGT or PRDO a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the stronger pick with 24.
2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) offers the better valuation at 14. 2x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Walmart Inc. (WMT) a "Buy" — based on 64 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LRN or WMT or TGT or PRDO?
On trailing P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the cheapest at 14.
2x versus Walmart Inc. at 47. 7x. On forward P/E, Perdoceo Education Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Stride, Inc. wins at 0. 22x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LRN or WMT or TGT or PRDO?
Over the past 5 years, Stride, Inc.
(LRN) delivered a total return of +223. 1%, compared to -31. 6% for Target Corporation (TGT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LRN returned +666. 0% versus TGT's +99. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LRN or WMT or TGT or PRDO?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 12β versus Target Corporation's 0. 95β — meaning TGT is approximately 717% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 11% versus 67% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LRN or WMT or TGT or PRDO?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is pulling ahead at 24.
2% versus -1. 7% for Target Corporation (TGT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Stride, Inc. grew EPS 26. 9% year-over-year, compared to -8. 2% for Target Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LRN leads at 12. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LRN or WMT or TGT or PRDO?
Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) is the more profitable company, earning 18.
9% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 18. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PRDO leads at 23. 2% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PRDO leads at 71. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LRN or WMT or TGT or PRDO more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Stride, Inc. (LRN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 22x versus Walmart Inc. 's 4. 06x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Perdoceo Education Corporation (PRDO) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 44. 7x for Walmart Inc. — 32. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LRN: 19. 4% to $109. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — LRN or WMT or TGT or PRDO?
In this comparison, TGT (3.
6% yield), PRDO (1. 6% yield), WMT (0. 7% yield) pay a dividend. LRN does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LRN or WMT or TGT or PRDO better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 12), 0. 7% yield, +499. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +499. 5%, TGT: +99. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LRN and WMT and TGT and PRDO?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LRN is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a mega-cap quality compounder stock; TGT is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PRDO is a small-cap high-growth stock. WMT, TGT, PRDO pay a dividend while LRN does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.