Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
LSBK logo
LSBK
NBTB logo
NBTB
CZWI logo
CZWI
TRST logo
TRST
FIS logo
FIS
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST vs FIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LSBK
Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$137M
5Y Perf.+92.3%
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$2.44B
5Y Perf.+51.8%
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$205M
5Y Perf.+211.1%
TRST
TrustCo Bank Corp NY

Banks - Regional

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$925M
5Y Perf.+65.1%
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.

Information Technology Services

TechnologyNYSE • US
Market Cap$19.75B
5Y Perf.-71.5%

LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST vs FIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LSBK logoLSBK
NBTB logoNBTB
CZWI logoCZWI
TRST logoTRST
FIS logoFIS
IndustryBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalBanks - RegionalInformation Technology Services
Market Cap$137M$2.44B$205M$925M$19.75B
Revenue (TTM)$40M$902M$90M$278M$11.66B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$169M$14M$61M$2.67B
Gross Margin70.9%73.6%54.7%67.1%37.6%
Operating Margin22.1%24.3%7.0%29.2%17.9%
Forward P/E18.1x11.2x11.7x18.2x6.1x
Total Debt$1M$327M$52M$193M$4.01B
Cash & Equiv.$64M$185M$119M$51M$599M

LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST vs FISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LSBK
NBTB
CZWI
TRST
FIS
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Lake Shore Bancorp,… (LSBK)100192.3+92.3%
NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB)100151.8+51.8%
Citizens Community … (CZWI)100311.1+211.1%
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST)100165.1+65.1%
Fidelity National I… (FIS)10028.5-71.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST vs FIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FIS leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility. NBTB and TRST also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FIS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
LSBK
Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

LSBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and bank quality is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.27, Low D/E 0.9%, current ratio 200.88x
  • NIM 3.4% vs TRST's 2.6%
  • Beta 0.27 vs NBTB's 0.73, lower leverage
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and bank quality
NBTB
NBT Bancorp Inc.
The Banking Pick

NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 10.4%, EPS growth 12.5%
  • 10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
Best for: growth exposure
CZWI
Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
The Banking Pick

CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and defensive.

  • 121.2% 10Y total return vs LSBK's 111.6%
  • Beta 0.42, yield 1.7%, current ratio 3015.31x
Best for: long-term compounding and defensive
TRST
TrustCo Bank Corp NY
The Banking Pick

TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +74.9% vs FIS's -50.4%
Best for: momentum
FIS
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.
The Income Pick

FIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and valuation efficiency.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.57, yield 4.3%
  • PEG 0.25 vs TRST's 5.02
  • Lower P/E (6.1x vs 18.2x), PEG 0.25 vs 5.02
  • 22.9% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNBTB logoNBTB10.4% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
ValueFIS logoFISLower P/E (6.1x vs 18.2x), PEG 0.25 vs 5.02
Quality / MarginsFIS logoFIS22.9% margin vs CZWI's 16.0%
Stability / SafetyLSBK logoLSBKBeta 0.27 vs NBTB's 0.73, lower leverage
DividendsFIS logoFIS4.3% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs NBTB's 3.1%
Momentum (1Y)TRST logoTRST+74.9% vs FIS's -50.4%
Efficiency (ROA)FIS logoFIS7.5% ROA vs CZWI's 0.8%, ROIC 6.0% vs 2.0%

LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST vs FIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Fintech Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Fintech Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
LSBKLake Shore Bancorp, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

NBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.
FY 2025
Insurance Revenue
100.0%$18M
CZWICitizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
FY 2025
Reportable Segment
100.0%$99M
TRSTTrustCo Bank Corp NY
FY 2025
Wealth Management Fees Member
77.1%$8M
Other Member
22.9%$2M
FISFidelity National Information Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Banking Solutions
69.5%$7.3B
Capital Market Solutions
30.5%$3.2B

LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST vs FIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFISLAGGINGTRST

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

FIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $11.7B annually — 294.7x LSBK's $40M. FIS is the more profitable business, keeping 22.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CZWI's 16.0%.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$40M$902M$90M$278M$11.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$9M$241M$9M$90M$4.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$7M$169M$14M$61M$2.7B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$7M$225M$11M$46M$2.8B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+70.9%+73.6%+54.7%+67.1%+37.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+22.1%+24.3%+7.0%+29.2%+17.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+18.4%+18.8%+16.0%+22.0%+22.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+18.8%+24.9%+12.4%+16.4%+23.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+30.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+36.8%+39.5%+63.0%+44.1%+30.6%
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.0x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 72% valuation discount to FIS's 50.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), LSBK offers better value at 1.59x vs TRST's 4.43x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Market CapShares × price$137M$2.4B$205M$925M$19.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$74M$2.6B$138M$1.1B$23.2B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS18.13x14.02x14.62x16.07x50.95x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.11.18x11.73x18.20x6.09x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.59x1.99x2.88x4.43x2.09x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.02x10.70x15.56x11.89x6.36x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue3.46x2.81x2.28x3.32x1.85x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.91x1.25x1.10x1.39x1.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.40x11.13x19.79x20.23x7.03x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

FIS delivers a 18.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $6 for LSBK. LSBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIS's 0.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LSBK scores 8/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.3%+9.5%+7.8%+8.9%+18.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+1.0%+1.1%+0.8%+1.0%+7.5%
ROICReturn on invested capital+5.4%+7.9%+2.0%+7.2%+6.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+2.1%+2.4%+0.6%+2.8%+6.6%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–987676
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.01x0.17x0.28x0.28x0.29x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$63M$142M-$67M$142M$3.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$64M$185M$119M$51M$599M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1M$327M$52M$193M$4.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.75x1.05x0.16x0.90x21.16x
FIS leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — CZWI and TRST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TRST five years ago would be worth $17,356 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,259 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +74.9% total return vs FIS's -50.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 35.7% vs FIS's -7.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+19.7%+14.0%+23.6%+28.4%-40.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+53.1%+20.5%+62.6%+74.9%-50.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+123.3%+49.9%+149.8%+87.9%-21.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+67.1%+46.9%+64.1%+73.6%-67.4%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+111.6%+103.1%+121.2%+108.7%-26.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.7%+14.5%+35.7%+23.4%-7.6%
Evenly matched — CZWI and TRST each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LSBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LSBK is the less volatile stock with a 0.27 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NBTB's 0.73 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LSBK currently trades 100.0% from its 52-week high vs FIS's 46.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.27x0.73x0.42x0.63x0.57x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.40$48.81$22.62$55.60$82.74
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$8.63$39.20$12.83$30.52$37.85
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+100.0%+95.6%+94.3%+94.0%+46.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10063.151.056.850.835.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9K277K48K101K5.7M
LSBK leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", TRST as "Hold", FIS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 64.6% upside for FIS (target: $63) vs -1.5% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 4.27% vs LSBK's 0.79%.

MetricLSBK logoLSBKLake Shore Bancor…NBTB logoNBTBNBT Bancorp Inc.CZWI logoCZWICitizens Communit…TRST logoTRSTTrustCo Bank Corp…FIS logoFISFidelity National…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$46.00$62.88
# AnalystsCovering analysts102337
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+3.1%+1.7%+2.9%+4.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises013611
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.14$1.43$0.37$1.51$1.63
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.0%+0.4%+3.0%+4.1%+7.2%
Evenly matched — NBTB and FIS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). LSBK leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.

Best OverallFidelity National Informati… (FIS)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LSBK vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST vs FIS: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST or FIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the stronger pick with 10. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (11. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST or FIS?

On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is the cheapest at 14. 0x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 50. 9x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 25x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 5. 02x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST or FIS?

Over the past 5 years, TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) delivered a total return of +73.

6%, compared to -67. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +121. 2% versus FIS's -26. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST or FIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.

(LSBK) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 27β versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 0. 73β — meaning NBTB is approximately 169% more volatile than LSBK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 29% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST or FIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NBT Bancorp Inc.

(NBTB) is pulling ahead at 10. 4% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 47. 7% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST or FIS?

TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.

0% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus 7. 0% for CZWI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST or FIS more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 5. 02x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 6. 1x forward P/E versus 18. 2x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 12. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIS: 64. 6% to $62. 88.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST or FIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 4. 3%, versus 0. 8% for Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc. (LSBK).

09

Is LSBK or NBTB or CZWI or TRST or FIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Lake Shore Bancorp, Inc.

(LSBK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 27), 0. 8% yield, +111. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LSBK: +111. 6%, NBTB: +103. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LSBK and NBTB and CZWI and TRST and FIS?

These companies operate in different sectors (LSBK (Financial Services) and NBTB (Financial Services) and CZWI (Financial Services) and TRST (Financial Services) and FIS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LSBK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock; FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.