Electrical Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
LTBR vs GEV vs PCG vs PLUG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
Regulated Electric
Electrical Equipment & Parts
LTBR vs GEV vs PCG vs PLUG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Renewable Utilities | Regulated Electric | Electrical Equipment & Parts |
| Market Cap | $353M | $281.02B | $35.65B | $4.36B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $39.38B | $25.83B | $710M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-21M | $9.38B | $2.95B | $-1.63B |
| Gross Margin | — | 19.9% | 45.9% | 99.8% |
| Operating Margin | — | 3.9% | 19.4% | 38.1% |
| Forward P/E | — | 37.6x | 9.8x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $0.00 | $61.34B | $997M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $202M | $8.85B | $713M | $1M |
LTBR vs GEV vs PCG vs PLUG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lightbridge Corpora… (LTBR) | 100 | 461.7 | +361.7% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 764.7 | +664.7% |
| PG&E Corporation (PCG) | 100 | 96.6 | -3.4% |
| Plug Power Inc. (PLUG) | 100 | 91.0 | -9.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LTBR vs GEV vs PCG vs PLUG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LTBR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth.
- 154.5% revenue growth vs PCG's 2.1%
GEV is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 217.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs LTBR's -56.3%
- 23.8% margin vs PLUG's -229.8%
- 15.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 27.9% vs 10.9%
PCG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.45, yield 0.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.45, current ratio 0.97x
- Beta 0.45, yield 0.6%, current ratio 0.97x
- Better valuation composite
PLUG is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +303.6% vs PCG's -5.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 154.5% revenue growth vs PCG's 2.1% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs PLUG's -229.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.45 vs LTBR's 3.51 | |
| Dividends | 0.6% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GEV's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +303.6% vs PCG's -5.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs PLUG's -64.3%, ROIC 27.9% vs 10.9% |
LTBR vs GEV vs PCG vs PLUG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LTBR vs GEV vs PCG vs PLUG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PCG leads in 2 of 6 categories
GEV leads 2 • LTBR leads 0 • PLUG leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — GEV and PLUG each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV and LTBR operate at a comparable scale, with $39.4B and $0 in trailing revenue. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PLUG's -2.3%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $39.4B | $25.8B | $710M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$13M | $2.2B | $9.6B | -$1.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$21M | $9.4B | $3.0B | -$1.6B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$16M | $3.6B | -$4.2B | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +19.9% | +45.9% | +99.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +3.9% | +19.4% | +38.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +23.8% | +11.4% | -2.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | +9.2% | -16.3% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +16.1% | +15.0% | +17.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.7% | +18.2% | +39.3% | +95.9% |
Valuation Metrics
PCG leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.7x trailing earnings, PCG trades at a 77% valuation discount to GEV's 59.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PCG's 9.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GEV's 121.5x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $353M | $281.0B | $35.7B | $4.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $151M | $272.2B | $96.3B | $5.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -17.02x | 59.12x | 13.72x | — |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 37.62x | 9.84x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 121.45x | 9.75x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 7.38x | 1.43x | 6.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.65x | 23.47x | 1.09x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 75.73x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $-124 for PLUG. PCG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.87x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PLUG's 19.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs LTBR's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.6% | +79.7% | +9.1% | -124.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -12.5% | +15.2% | +2.1% | -64.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.0% | +27.9% | +4.0% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -19.1% | +6.6% | +4.0% | +18.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | — | 1.87x | 19.75x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$202M | -$8.8B | $60.6B | $996M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $202M | $8.8B | $713M | $1M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $0 | $61.3B | $997M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 1.61x | -36.18x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $79,830 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,358 for PLUG. Over the past 12 months, PLUG leads with a +303.6% total return vs PCG's -5.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 99.9% vs PLUG's -30.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -3.5% | +54.0% | -0.2% | +40.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +45.7% | +157.4% | -5.0% | +303.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +291.4% | +698.3% | -5.6% | -66.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +190.4% | +698.3% | +50.2% | -86.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -56.3% | +698.3% | -67.1% | +62.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +57.6% | +99.9% | -1.9% | -30.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GEV and PCG each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PCG is the less volatile stock with a 0.45 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LTBR's 3.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs LTBR's 43.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.51x | 1.76x | 0.45x | 2.57x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $31.34 | $1181.95 | $19.16 | $4.58 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.21 | $387.03 | $12.97 | $0.69 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +43.5% | +88.5% | +84.5% | +68.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 62.0 | 66.5 | 33.5 | 63.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 843K | 2.4M | 21.3M | 76.5M |
Analyst Outlook
PCG leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GEV as "Buy", PCG as "Buy", PLUG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.1% upside for PCG (target: $23) vs 7.1% for GEV (target: $1120). PCG is the only dividend payer here at 0.62% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $1119.95 | $23.00 | $3.91 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 28 | 29 | 38 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% | +0.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | $0.10 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.2% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PCG leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). GEV leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
LTBR vs GEV vs PCG vs PLUG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LTBR or GEV or PCG or PLUG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Plug Power Inc.
(PLUG) is the stronger pick with 12. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 2. 1% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). PG&E Corporation (PCG) offers the better valuation at 13. 7x trailing P/E (9. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LTBR or GEV or PCG or PLUG?
On trailing P/E, PG&E Corporation (PCG) is the cheapest at 13.
7x versus GE Vernova Inc. at 59. 1x. On forward P/E, PG&E Corporation is actually cheaper at 9. 8x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LTBR or GEV or PCG or PLUG?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +698. 3%, compared to -86. 4% for Plug Power Inc. (PLUG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +698. 3% versus PCG's -67. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LTBR or GEV or PCG or PLUG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), PG&E Corporation (PCG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
45β versus Lightbridge Corporation's 3. 51β — meaning LTBR is approximately 684% more volatile than PCG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, PG&E Corporation (PCG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 187% versus 20% for Plug Power Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LTBR or GEV or PCG or PLUG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Plug Power Inc.
(PLUG) is pulling ahead at 12. 9% versus 2. 1% for PG&E Corporation (PCG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to 1. 2% for Lightbridge Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, GEV leads at 8. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LTBR or GEV or PCG or PLUG?
GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 8% net margin versus -229. 8% for Plug Power Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLUG leads at 38. 1% versus 0. 0% for LTBR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLUG leads at 99. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LTBR or GEV or PCG or PLUG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, PG&E Corporation (PCG) trades at 9.
8x forward P/E versus 37. 6x for GE Vernova Inc. — 27. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PCG: 42. 1% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LTBR or GEV or PCG or PLUG?
In this comparison, PCG (0.
6% yield) pays a dividend. LTBR, GEV, PLUG do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is LTBR or GEV or PCG or PLUG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PG&E Corporation (PCG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
45), 0. 6% yield). Lightbridge Corporation (LTBR) carries a higher beta of 3. 51 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PCG: -67. 1%, LTBR: -56. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LTBR and GEV and PCG and PLUG?
These companies operate in different sectors (LTBR (Industrials) and GEV (Utilities) and PCG (Utilities) and PLUG (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LTBR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GEV is a large-cap quality compounder stock; PCG is a mid-cap deep-value stock; PLUG is a small-cap quality compounder stock. PCG pays a dividend while LTBR, GEV, PLUG do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.