Leisure
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LTH vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
LTH vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Leisure | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $7.16B | $2.92T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.08B | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $386M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 58.2% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | 16.5% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 22.1x | 34.8x |
| Total Debt | $6.75B | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $232M | $86.81B |
LTH vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Oct 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Life Time Group Hol… (LTH) | 100 | 185.6 | +85.6% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 160.8 | +60.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LTH vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LTH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- beta 1.06
- Rev growth 14.3%, EPS growth 124.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.06, current ratio 0.63x
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.0% 10Y total return vs LTH's 81.3%
- +43.7% vs LTH's -2.4%
- 11.5% ROA vs LTH's 4.8%, ROIC 14.7% vs 4.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.3% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (22.1x vs 34.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 12.5% margin vs AMZN's 12.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.06 vs AMZN's 1.51 | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs LTH's -2.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.5% ROA vs LTH's 4.8%, ROIC 14.7% vs 4.4% |
LTH vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LTH vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — LTH and AMZN each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 241.3x LTH's $3.1B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 12.5% (LTH) to 12.2% (AMZN). On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.1B | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $815M | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $386M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$124M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.2% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +16.5% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.7% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +14.7% | +74.8% |
Valuation Metrics
LTH leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 19.4x trailing earnings, LTH trades at a 49% valuation discount to AMZN's 37.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, LTH's 17.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than AMZN's 20.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $7.2B | $2.92T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $13.7B | $2.98T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 19.38x | 37.82x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.11x | 34.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.35x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.59x | 20.47x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.39x | 4.07x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 2.32x | 7.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 378.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $13 for LTH. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LTH's 2.16x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.6% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.8% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.5% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 2.16x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $6.5B | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $232M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6.7B | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 9.49x | 39.96x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LTH five years ago would be worth $18,127 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $16,476 for AMZN. Over the past 12 months, AMZN leads with a +43.7% total return vs LTH's -2.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 36.8% vs LTH's 16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +20.6% | +19.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -2.4% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +58.5% | +156.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.3% | +64.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +81.3% | +697.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.6% | +36.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LTH and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LTH is the less volatile stock with a 1.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs LTH's 92.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.06x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.99 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $24.14 | $185.01 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +92.0% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 76.7 | 81.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 45.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LTH as "Buy" and AMZN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 29.5% upside for LTH (target: $42) vs 13.1% for AMZN (target: $307).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $41.67 | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMZN leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). LTH leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
LTH vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LTH or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
(LTH) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) offers the better valuation at 19. 4x trailing P/E (22. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LTH or AMZN?
On trailing P/E, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
(LTH) is the cheapest at 19. 4x versus Amazon. com, Inc. at 37. 8x. On forward P/E, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 22. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LTH or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
(LTH) delivered a total return of +81. 3%, compared to +64. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +697. 8% versus LTH's +81. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LTH or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
(LTH) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 06β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 43% more volatile than LTH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 2% for Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LTH or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
(LTH) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 124. 3% year-over-year, compared to 29. 7% for Amazon. com, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LTH leads at 18. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LTH or AMZN?
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
(LTH) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 5% net margin versus 10. 8% for Amazon. com, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LTH leads at 16. 1% versus 11. 2% for AMZN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LTH or AMZN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
(LTH) trades at 22. 1x forward P/E versus 34. 8x for Amazon. com, Inc. — 12. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LTH: 29. 5% to $41. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — LTH or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LTH or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+697. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +697. 8%, LTH: +81. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LTH and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.