Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI vs BSX

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LUNG
Pulmonx Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$54M
5Y Perf.-97.0%
ATRC
AtriCure, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$1.41B
5Y Perf.-19.6%
NVCR
NovoCure Limited

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • JE
Market Cap$1.92B
5Y Perf.-86.2%
MMSI
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

Medical - Instruments & Supplies

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.72B
5Y Perf.+24.5%
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation

Medical - Devices

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$84.08B
5Y Perf.+65.1%

LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI vs BSX — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LUNG logoLUNG
ATRC logoATRC
NVCR logoNVCR
MMSI logoMMSI
BSX logoBSX
IndustryMedical - DevicesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Instruments & SuppliesMedical - Devices
Market Cap$54M$1.41B$1.92B$3.72B$84.08B
Revenue (TTM)$90M$552M$674M$1.54B$20.07B
Net Income (TTM)$-54M$-5M$-173M$139M$2.89B
Gross Margin74.2%75.5%75.2%48.7%69.0%
Operating Margin-59.3%-0.4%-27.2%12.2%19.8%
Forward P/E370.7x15.5x16.7x
Total Debt$56M$88M$290M$898M$12.42B
Cash & Equiv.$70M$167M$103M$449M$2.04B

LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI vs BSXLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LUNG
ATRC
NVCR
MMSI
BSX
StockOct 20May 26Return
Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG)1003.0-97.0%
AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC)10080.4-19.6%
NovoCure Limited (NVCR)10013.8-86.2%
Merit Medical Syste… (MMSI)100124.5+24.5%
Boston Scientific C… (BSX)100165.1+65.1%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI vs BSX

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BSX leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. NovoCure Limited is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. MMSI also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LUNG
Pulmonx Corporation
The Healthcare Pick

LUNG lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: healthcare exposure
ATRC
AtriCure, Inc.
The Growth Play

ATRC is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 14.9%, EPS growth 74.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 17.4%
Best for: growth exposure
NVCR
NovoCure Limited
The Momentum Pick

NVCR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +1.1% vs LUNG's -65.5%
Best for: momentum
MMSI
Merit Medical Systems, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

MMSI ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 214.6% 10Y total return vs BSX's 155.5%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.71, Low D/E 56.7%, current ratio 4.34x
  • Beta 0.71, current ratio 4.34x
  • Lower P/E (15.5x vs 16.7x)
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
BSX
Boston Scientific Corporation
The Income Pick

BSX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.34
  • 19.9% revenue growth vs LUNG's 8.0%
  • 14.4% margin vs LUNG's -59.7%
  • Beta 0.34 vs LUNG's 2.36, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBSX logoBSX19.9% revenue growth vs LUNG's 8.0%
ValueMMSI logoMMSILower P/E (15.5x vs 16.7x)
Quality / MarginsBSX logoBSX14.4% margin vs LUNG's -59.7%
Stability / SafetyBSX logoBSXBeta 0.34 vs LUNG's 2.36, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)NVCR logoNVCR+1.1% vs LUNG's -65.5%
Efficiency (ROA)BSX logoBSX6.9% ROA vs LUNG's -38.2%, ROIC 8.8% vs -72.0%

LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI vs BSX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LUNGPulmonx Corporation

Segment breakdown not available.

ATRCAtriCure, Inc.
FY 2025
Shipping and Handling
100.0%$2M
NVCRNovoCure Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

MMSIMerit Medical Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Cardiovascular
95.2%$1.4B
Endoscopy
4.8%$73M
BSXBoston Scientific Corporation
FY 2025
Cardiovascular
66.0%$13.3B
MedSurg
34.0%$6.8B

LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI vs BSX — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLBSXLAGGINGNVCR

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

BSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

BSX is the larger business by revenue, generating $20.1B annually — 221.8x LUNG's $90M. BSX is the more profitable business, keeping 14.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LUNG's -59.7%. On growth, BSX holds the edge at +15.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLUNG logoLUNGPulmonx Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$90M$552M$674M$1.5B$20.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$53M$13M-$165M$290M$4.7B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$54M-$5M-$173M$139M$2.9B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$33M$54M-$48M$274M$3.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+74.2%+75.5%+75.2%+48.7%+69.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-59.3%-0.4%-27.2%+12.2%+19.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-59.7%-0.8%-25.7%+9.0%+14.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-36.3%+9.7%-7.1%+17.8%+18.1%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.9%+14.3%+12.3%+7.8%+15.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+24.2%+101.6%-100.0%+38.8%+18.5%
BSX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

MMSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 29.2x trailing earnings, BSX trades at a 0% valuation discount to MMSI's 29.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, MMSI's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than ATRC's 77.7x.

MetricLUNG logoLUNGPulmonx Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
Market CapShares × price$54M$1.4B$1.9B$3.7B$84.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$40M$1.3B$2.1B$4.2B$94.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-0.95x-115.83x-13.80x29.26x29.16x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.370.67x15.46x16.75x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple77.75x13.06x25.30x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.59x2.63x2.92x2.45x4.19x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.95x2.70x5.51x2.38x3.46x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF29.15x17.24x22.99x
MMSI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

BSX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

BSX delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $-83 for LUNG. ATRC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.18x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LUNG's 1.04x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BSX scores 7/9 vs LUNG's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLUNG logoLUNGPulmonx Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-82.8%-1.0%-50.8%+8.9%+12.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-38.2%-0.7%-16.5%+5.2%+6.9%
ROICReturn on invested capital-72.0%-0.6%-16.4%+7.2%+8.8%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-43.3%-0.6%-28.9%+7.9%+11.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–935567
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.04x0.18x0.85x0.57x0.51x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$14M-$79M$187M$450M$10.4B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$70M$167M$103M$449M$2.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$56M$88M$290M$898M$12.4B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-16.55x0.47x-96.80x10.74x11.03x
BSX leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

BSX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in BSX five years ago would be worth $13,117 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $298 for LUNG. Over the past 12 months, NVCR leads with a +1.1% total return vs LUNG's -65.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BSX at 2.1% vs LUNG's -53.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLUNG logoLUNGPulmonx Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-44.8%-29.2%+28.3%-27.9%-40.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-65.5%-8.3%+1.1%-33.8%-46.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-89.8%-41.8%-75.7%-26.5%+6.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-97.0%-64.2%-91.3%-3.6%+31.2%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-96.8%+95.1%+30.3%+214.6%+155.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-53.3%-16.5%-37.6%-9.8%+2.1%
BSX leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NVCR and BSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

BSX is the less volatile stock with a 0.34 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LUNG's 2.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NVCR currently trades 83.9% from its 52-week high vs LUNG's 32.7% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLUNG logoLUNGPulmonx Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.36x1.03x2.20x0.71x0.34x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.88$43.18$20.06$100.19$109.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.13$26.62$9.82$59.74$54.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+32.7%+64.4%+83.9%+62.2%+51.7%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10045.545.069.834.933.2
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded567K669K1.5M769K15.5M
Evenly matched — NVCR and BSX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: ATRC as "Buy", NVCR as "Buy", MMSI as "Buy", BSX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 99.0% upside for NVCR (target: $34) vs 52.4% for MMSI (target: $95).

MetricLUNG logoLUNGPulmonx Corporati…ATRC logoATRCAtriCure, Inc.NVCR logoNVCRNovoCure LimitedMMSI logoMMSIMerit Medical Sys…BSX logoBSXBoston Scientific…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$50.67$33.50$95.00$91.33
# AnalystsCovering analysts19151343
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.8%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

BSX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MMSI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallBoston Scientific Corporati… (BSX)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LUNG vs ATRC vs NVCR vs MMSI vs BSX: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI or BSX a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the stronger pick with 19.

9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG). Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) offers the better valuation at 29. 2x trailing P/E (16. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI or BSX?

On trailing P/E, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the cheapest at 29.

2x versus Merit Medical Systems, Inc. at 29. 3x. On forward P/E, Merit Medical Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 15. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI or BSX?

Over the past 5 years, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) delivered a total return of +31.

2%, compared to -97. 0% for Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMSI returned +214. 6% versus LUNG's -96. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI or BSX?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

34β versus Pulmonx Corporation's 2. 36β — meaning LUNG is approximately 585% more volatile than BSX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, AtriCure, Inc. (ATRC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 18% versus 104% for Pulmonx Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI or BSX?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is pulling ahead at 19.

9% versus 8. 0% for Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: AtriCure, Inc. grew EPS 74. 7% year-over-year, compared to 4. 9% for Merit Medical Systems, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LUNG leads at 19. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI or BSX?

Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the more profitable company, earning 14.

4% net margin versus -59. 7% for Pulmonx Corporation — meaning it keeps 14. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BSX leads at 19. 8% versus -59. 3% for LUNG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NVCR leads at 74. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI or BSX more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, Merit Medical Systems, Inc.

(MMSI) trades at 15. 5x forward P/E versus 370. 7x for AtriCure, Inc. — 355. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVCR: 99. 0% to $33. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI or BSX?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is LUNG or ATRC or NVCR or MMSI or BSX better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Boston Scientific Corporation (BSX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

34), +155. 5% 10Y return). Pulmonx Corporation (LUNG) carries a higher beta of 2. 36 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BSX: +155. 5%, LUNG: -96. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LUNG and ATRC and NVCR and MMSI and BSX?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LUNG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ATRC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NVCR is a small-cap quality compounder stock; MMSI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BSX is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LUNG

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 44%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ATRC

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NVCR

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 6%
  • Gross Margin > 45%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

MMSI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BSX

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 7%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LUNG and ATRC and NVCR and MMSI and BSX on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LUNG: -4.9% · ATRC: 14.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.