Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LYB vs LIN

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$23.67B
5Y Perf.+15.2%
LIN
Linde plc

Chemicals - Specialty

Basic MaterialsNASDAQ • GB
Market Cap$232.56B
5Y Perf.+148.0%

LYB vs LIN — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LYB logoLYB
LIN logoLIN
IndustryChemicals - SpecialtyChemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$23.67B$232.56B
Revenue (TTM)$22.48B$34.66B
Net Income (TTM)$-774M$7.13B
Gross Margin-19.3%46.0%
Operating Margin-0.9%28.8%
Forward P/E10.2x28.1x
Total Debt$15.96B$26.99B
Cash & Equiv.$3.45B$5.06B

LYB vs LINLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LYB
LIN
StockMay 20May 26Return
LyondellBasell Indu… (LYB)100115.2+15.2%
Linde plc (LIN)100248.0+148.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LYB vs LIN

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: LIN leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. LyondellBasell Industries N.V. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries N.V.
The Defensive Pick

LYB is the clearest fit if your priority is defensive.

  • Beta 0.38, yield 7.5%, current ratio 1.77x
  • Lower P/E (10.2x vs 28.1x)
  • 7.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%
Best for: defensive
LIN
Linde plc
The Income Pick

LIN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.24, yield 1.2%
  • Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth 7.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 0.6%
  • 376.9% 10Y total return vs LYB's 49.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthLIN logoLIN3.0% revenue growth vs LYB's -25.2%
ValueLYB logoLYBLower P/E (10.2x vs 28.1x)
Quality / MarginsLIN logoLIN20.6% margin vs LYB's -3.4%
Stability / SafetyLIN logoLINBeta 0.24 vs LYB's 0.38, lower leverage
DividendsLYB logoLYB7.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs LIN's 1.2%
Momentum (1Y)LYB logoLYB+40.1% vs LIN's +13.6%
Efficiency (ROA)LIN logoLIN8.3% ROA vs LYB's -3.0%, ROIC 11.3% vs -1.1%

LYB vs LIN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LYBLyondellBasell Industries N.V.
FY 2025
Polyethylene
26.3%$7.2B
Polypropylene
21.3%$5.8B
Oxyfuels And Related Products
17.6%$4.8B
Olefins And Co Products
15.3%$4.2B
Compounding and solutions
12.6%$3.5B
Intermediates and Derivatives
6.9%$1.9B
LINLinde plc
FY 2025
Americas Segment
45.9%$15.2B
EMEA Segment
25.8%$8.5B
APAC Segment
20.1%$6.7B
Engineering Segment
8.2%$2.7B

LYB vs LIN — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLLINLAGGINGLYB

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

LIN is the larger business by revenue, generating $34.7B annually — 1.5x LYB's $22.5B. LIN is the more profitable business, keeping 20.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYB's -3.4%. On growth, LIN holds the edge at +8.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLYB logoLYBLyondellBasell In…LIN logoLINLinde plc
RevenueTrailing 12 months$22.5B$34.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$865M$12.1B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$774M$7.1B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$3.1B$5.1B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue-19.3%+46.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-0.9%+28.8%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-3.4%+20.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+13.6%+14.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+8.2%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-100.0%+13.4%
LIN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

LYB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

On an enterprise value basis, LIN's 20.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYB's 34.0x.

MetricLYB logoLYBLyondellBasell In…LIN logoLINLinde plc
Market CapShares × price$23.7B$232.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$36.2B$254.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-31.27x34.40x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.19x28.12x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.36x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple34.04x20.04x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.79x6.84x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.32x5.92x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF61.65x45.70x
LYB leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

LIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

LIN delivers a 17.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $18 in annual profit, vs $-7 for LYB. LIN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.68x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYB's 1.56x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LIN scores 6/9 vs LYB's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricLYB logoLYBLyondellBasell In…LIN logoLINLinde plc
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-7.2%+17.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-3.0%+8.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-1.1%+11.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-1.1%+13.0%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–936
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.56x0.68x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$12.5B$21.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3.4B$5.1B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$16.0B$27.0B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-1.42x34.52x
LIN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LIN five years ago would be worth $17,813 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $9,035 for LYB. Over the past 12 months, LYB leads with a +40.1% total return vs LIN's +13.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LIN at 12.4% vs LYB's -1.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLYB logoLYBLyondellBasell In…LIN logoLINLinde plc
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+67.1%+17.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+40.1%+13.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-3.4%+41.9%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-9.6%+78.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+49.4%+376.9%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-1.1%+12.4%
LIN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

LIN is the less volatile stock with a 0.24 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LYB's 0.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LIN currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs LYB's 87.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLYB logoLYBLyondellBasell In…LIN logoLINLinde plc
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.38x0.24x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$83.94$521.28
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$41.58$387.78
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+87.5%+96.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10060.450.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded8.1M2.3M
LIN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — LYB and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates LYB as "Hold" and LIN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 7.5% upside for LIN (target: $540) vs 0.2% for LYB (target: $74). For income investors, LYB offers the higher dividend yield at 7.46% vs LIN's 1.20%.

MetricLYB logoLYBLyondellBasell In…LIN logoLINLinde plc
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$73.60$539.71
# AnalystsCovering analysts3928
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+7.5%+1.2%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises26
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$5.48$6.00
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.8%+2.0%
Evenly matched — LYB and LIN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

LIN leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). LYB leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.

Best OverallLinde plc (LIN)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LYB vs LIN: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LYB or LIN a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger pick with 3.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Linde plc (LIN) offers the better valuation at 34. 4x trailing P/E (28. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Linde plc (LIN) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LYB or LIN?

On forward P/E, LyondellBasell Industries N.

V. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LYB or LIN?

Over the past 5 years, Linde plc (LIN) delivered a total return of +78.

1%, compared to -9. 6% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LIN returned +376. 9% versus LYB's +49. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LYB or LIN?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Linde plc (LIN) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

24β versus LyondellBasell Industries N. V. 's 0. 38β — meaning LYB is approximately 59% more volatile than LIN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Linde plc (LIN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 68% versus 156% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LYB or LIN?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Linde plc (LIN) is pulling ahead at 3.

0% versus -25. 2% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Linde plc grew EPS 7. 1% year-over-year, compared to -156. 6% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIN leads at 0. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LYB or LIN?

Linde plc (LIN) is the more profitable company, earning 20.

3% net margin versus -2. 5% for LyondellBasell Industries N. V. — meaning it keeps 20. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LIN leads at 26. 3% versus -1. 1% for LYB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — LIN leads at 43. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LYB or LIN more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, LyondellBasell Industries N.

V. (LYB) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 28. 1x for Linde plc — 17. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for LIN: 7. 5% to $539. 71.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LYB or LIN?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

LyondellBasell Industries N. V. (LYB) offers the highest yield at 7. 5%, versus 1. 2% for Linde plc (LIN).

09

Is LYB or LIN better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Linde plc (LIN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

24), 1. 2% yield, +376. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIN: +376. 9%, LYB: +49. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LYB and LIN?

Both stocks operate in the Basic Materials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: LYB is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; LIN is a large-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

LYB

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 2.9%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LIN

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Basic Materials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LYB and LIN on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LYB: -100.0% · LIN: 8.2%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.