Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

LYTS vs APOG vs NX vs AWI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
LYTS
LSI Industries Inc.

Hardware, Equipment & Parts

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$760M
5Y Perf.+297.7%
APOG
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$787M
5Y Perf.+77.1%
NX
Quanex Building Products Corporation

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$916M
5Y Perf.+61.8%
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

Construction

IndustrialsNYSE • US
Market Cap$7.05B
5Y Perf.+119.0%

LYTS vs APOG vs NX vs AWI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
LYTS logoLYTS
APOG logoAPOG
NX logoNX
AWI logoAWI
IndustryHardware, Equipment & PartsConstructionConstructionConstruction
Market Cap$760M$787M$916M$7.05B
Revenue (TTM)$592M$1.40B$1.85B$1.65B
Net Income (TTM)$26M$54M$-240M$306M
Gross Margin25.3%22.7%26.1%40.3%
Operating Margin6.5%6.7%-10.0%27.5%
Forward P/E22.3x10.6x10.0x19.9x
Total Debt$67M$286M$854M$532M
Cash & Equiv.$3M$40M$76M$113M

LYTS vs APOG vs NX vs AWILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

LYTS
APOG
NX
AWI
StockMay 20May 26Return
LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS)100397.7+297.7%
Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG)100177.1+77.1%
Quanex Building Pro… (NX)100161.8+61.8%
Armstrong World Ind… (AWI)100219.0+119.0%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: LYTS vs APOG vs NX vs AWI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: AWI leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for profitability and margin quality and capital preservation and lower volatility. Apogee Enterprises, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. LYTS and NX also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LYTS
LSI Industries Inc.
The Defensive Pick

LYTS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.43, Low D/E 28.9%, current ratio 1.99x
  • +58.0% vs APOG's -2.8%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
APOG
Apogee Enterprises, Inc.
The Income Pick

APOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
  • PEG 0.32 vs LYTS's 1.31
  • Beta 1.25, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.65x
  • Lower P/E (10.6x vs 19.9x)
Best for: income & stability and valuation efficiency
NX
Quanex Building Products Corporation
The Growth Play

NX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 43.8%, EPS growth -7.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
  • 43.8% revenue growth vs APOG's 3.2%
Best for: growth exposure
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • 330.4% 10Y total return vs LYTS's 108.5%
  • 18.6% margin vs NX's -13.0%
  • Beta 0.82 vs NX's 1.89, lower leverage
  • 16.0% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs -8.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNX logoNX43.8% revenue growth vs APOG's 3.2%
ValueAPOG logoAPOGLower P/E (10.6x vs 19.9x)
Quality / MarginsAWI logoAWI18.6% margin vs NX's -13.0%
Stability / SafetyAWI logoAWIBeta 0.82 vs NX's 1.89, lower leverage
DividendsAPOG logoAPOG2.8% yield, 14-year raise streak, vs AWI's 0.8%
Momentum (1Y)LYTS logoLYTS+58.0% vs APOG's -2.8%
Efficiency (ROA)AWI logoAWI16.0% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs -8.8%

LYTS vs APOG vs NX vs AWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

LYTSLSI Industries Inc.
FY 2025
Display Solutions Segment
56.7%$325M
Lighting Segment
43.3%$248M
APOGApogee Enterprises, Inc.
FY 2026
Architectural Metals Segment
35.4%$504M
Architectural Services segment
30.8%$439M
Architectural
19.9%$284M
Performance Surfaces
13.9%$198M
NXQuanex Building Products Corporation
FY 2024
NA Engineered Components
60.2%$650M
EU Engineered Components
21.4%$231M
NA Cabinet Components
18.4%$198M
AWIArmstrong World Industries, Inc.
FY 2025
Mineral Fiber
63.6%$1.0B
Architectural Specialties
36.4%$590M

LYTS vs APOG vs NX vs AWI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAWILAGGINGLYTS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

NX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 3.1x LYTS's $592M. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NX's -13.0%. On growth, AWI holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricLYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…NX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$592M$1.4B$1.8B$1.6B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$51M$57M-$81M$603M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$26M$54M-$240M$306M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$38M$95M$95M$247M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+25.3%+22.7%+26.1%+40.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.5%+6.7%-10.0%+27.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+4.3%+3.9%-13.0%+18.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.4%+6.8%+5.1%+15.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-0.5%+1.6%+2.3%+7.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.1%+6.1%+71.9%-1.9%
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.5x trailing earnings, APOG trades at a 53% valuation discount to LYTS's 30.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs LYTS's 1.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricLYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…NX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
Market CapShares × price$760M$787M$916M$7.0B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$823M$1.0B$1.7B$7.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS30.91x14.52x-3.70x23.32x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.34x10.64x9.99x19.87x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.82x0.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.03x21.95x17.23x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.33x0.56x0.50x4.35x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.26x1.53x1.28x7.99x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.94x8.27x8.96x28.63x
NX leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NX. LYTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to NX's 1.18x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs NX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricLYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…NX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.9%+10.8%-30.2%+34.8%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+6.5%+4.8%-11.7%+16.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.5%+8.1%-8.8%+24.9%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.6%+9.7%-10.4%+26.5%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–95749
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.29x0.56x1.18x0.59x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$63M$247M$778M$419M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$3M$40M$76M$113M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$67M$286M$854M$532M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense13.52x5.97x-3.30x13.31x
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LYTS and AWI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,341 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,802 for NX. Over the past 12 months, LYTS leads with a +58.0% total return vs APOG's -2.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs APOG's -0.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricLYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…NX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+32.8%-1.3%+31.1%-16.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+58.0%-2.8%+23.2%+11.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+100.0%-0.1%+6.0%+151.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+223.4%+12.9%-22.0%+63.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+108.5%+10.5%+23.7%+330.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+26.0%-0.0%+2.0%+36.0%
Evenly matched — LYTS and AWI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — LYTS and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.82 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NX's 1.89 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs APOG's 73.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricLYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…NX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.43x1.25x1.89x0.82x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$24.75$49.99$22.98$206.08
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$15.31$30.75$11.04$148.25
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.7%+73.2%+87.3%+80.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10070.153.654.641.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded378K253K458K494K
Evenly matched — LYTS and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: LYTS as "Buy", APOG as "Hold", NX as "Hold", AWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 92.7% upside for APOG (target: $71) vs 10.6% for LYTS (target: $27). For income investors, APOG offers the higher dividend yield at 2.83% vs AWI's 0.77%.

MetricLYTS logoLYTSLSI Industries In…APOG logoAPOGApogee Enterprise…NX logoNXQuanex Building P…AWI logoAWIArmstrong World I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$27.00$70.50$197.50
# AnalystsCovering analysts561026
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.8%+2.8%+1.6%+0.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises21408
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.19$1.04$0.32$1.27
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+1.9%+3.5%+1.8%
APOG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

AWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). NX leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallArmstrong World Industries,… (AWI)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

LYTS vs APOG vs NX vs AWI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is LYTS or APOG or NX or AWI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is the stronger pick with 43.

8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the better valuation at 14. 5x trailing P/E (10. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — LYTS or APOG or NX or AWI?

On trailing P/E, Apogee Enterprises, Inc.

(APOG) is the cheapest at 14. 5x versus LSI Industries Inc. at 30. 9x. On forward P/E, Quanex Building Products Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 31x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — LYTS or APOG or NX or AWI?

Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.

(LYTS) delivered a total return of +223. 4%, compared to -22. 0% for Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +330. 4% versus APOG's +10. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — LYTS or APOG or NX or AWI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 82β versus Quanex Building Products Corporation's 1. 89β — meaning NX is approximately 131% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 118% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — LYTS or APOG or NX or AWI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is pulling ahead at 43.

8% versus 3. 2% for Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -703. 3% for Quanex Building Products Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NX leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — LYTS or APOG or NX or AWI?

Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -13. 6% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus -10. 6% for NX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is LYTS or APOG or NX or AWI more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 31x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) trades at 10. 0x forward P/E versus 22. 3x for LSI Industries Inc. — 12. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for APOG: 92. 7% to $70. 50.

08

Which pays a better dividend — LYTS or APOG or NX or AWI?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) offers the highest yield at 2. 8%, versus 0. 8% for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI).

09

Is LYTS or APOG or NX or AWI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.

(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +330. 4% 10Y return). Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) carries a higher beta of 1. 89 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +330. 4%, NX: +23. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between LYTS and APOG and NX and AWI?

These companies operate in different sectors (LYTS (Technology) and APOG (Industrials) and NX (Industrials) and AWI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; NX is a small-cap high-growth stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

LYTS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

APOG

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 13%
  • Dividend Yield > 1.1%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NX

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 15%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AWI

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 11%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform LYTS and APOG and NX and AWI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(LYTS: -0.5% · APOG: 1.6%)
Net Margin>
%
(LYTS: 4.3% · APOG: 3.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(LYTS: 30.9x · APOG: 14.5x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.