LYTS vs HUBB vs ACCO vs AYI vs REZI

For growth investors, LSI Industries Inc.

(LYTS) is the stronger pick with 22. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is the cheapest at 9.

2x versus LSI Industries Inc. at 31. 1x. On forward P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Acuity Brands, Inc. wins at 1. 01x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 32x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.

(LYTS) delivered a total return of +227. 7%, compared to -39. 3% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HUBB returned +410. 2% versus ACCO's -35. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

32β versus Resideo Technologies, Inc. 's 2. 24β — meaning REZI is approximately 70% more volatile than HUBB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 139% for ACCO Brands Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), LSI Industries Inc.

(LYTS) is pulling ahead at 22. 1% versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCO Brands Corporation grew EPS 141. 5% year-over-year, compared to -718. 0% for Resideo Technologies, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYTS leads at 8. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the more profitable company, earning 15.

2% net margin versus -7. 1% for Resideo Technologies, Inc. — meaning it keeps 15. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: HUBB leads at 20. 8% versus 6. 2% for LYTS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AYI leads at 47. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Acuity Brands, Inc. (AYI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 01x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 24. 9x for Hubbell Incorporated — 20. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACCO: 98. 0% to $8. 00.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 0. 2% for Acuity Brands, Inc. (AYI).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1.

1% yield, +410. 2% 10Y return). Resideo Technologies, Inc. (REZI) carries a higher beta of 2. 24 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (HUBB: +410. 2%, REZI: +37. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (LYTS (Technology) and HUBB (Industrials) and ACCO (Industrials) and AYI (Industrials) and REZI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; HUBB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ACCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; AYI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; REZI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. LYTS, HUBB, ACCO, REZI pay a dividend while AYI does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.