Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
LYTS vs NX vs APOG vs ACCO vs AWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Construction
Construction
Business Equipment & Supplies
Construction
LYTS vs NX vs APOG vs ACCO vs AWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Construction | Construction | Business Equipment & Supplies | Construction |
| Market Cap | $765M | $925M | $788M | $373M | $6.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $592M | $1.85B | $1.40B | $1.55B | $1.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $26M | $-240M | $54M | $74M | $306M |
| Gross Margin | 25.3% | 26.1% | 22.7% | 30.7% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | 6.5% | -10.0% | 6.7% | 7.9% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 22.5x | 10.1x | 10.7x | 4.6x | 19.5x |
| Total Debt | $67M | $854M | $286M | $921M | $532M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3M | $76M | $40M | $64M | $113M |
LYTS vs NX vs APOG vs ACCO vs AWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) | 100 | 400.0 | +300.0% |
| Quanex Building Pro… (NX) | 100 | 163.3 | +63.3% |
| Apogee Enterprises,… (APOG) | 100 | 177.5 | +77.5% |
| ACCO Brands Corpora… (ACCO) | 100 | 65.3 | -34.7% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 214.6 | +114.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LYTS vs NX vs APOG vs ACCO vs AWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LYTS ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +53.9% vs APOG's -6.7%
NX is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 43.8%, EPS growth -7.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 14.6%
- 43.8% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5%
APOG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 14 yrs, beta 1.25, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.25, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.65x
- PEG 0.32 vs LYTS's 1.32
- Beta 1.25, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.65x
ACCO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (4.6x vs 19.5x)
- 7.1% yield, vs APOG's 2.8%
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 322.1% 10Y total return vs LYTS's 109.6%
- 18.6% margin vs NX's -13.0%
- Beta 0.81 vs NX's 1.83, lower leverage
- 16.0% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs -8.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 43.8% revenue growth vs ACCO's -8.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.6x vs 19.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 18.6% margin vs NX's -13.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs NX's 1.83, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.1% yield, vs APOG's 2.8% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.9% vs APOG's -6.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 16.0% ROA vs NX's -11.7%, ROIC 24.9% vs -8.8% |
LYTS vs NX vs APOG vs ACCO vs AWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LYTS vs NX vs APOG vs ACCO vs AWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AWI leads in 2 of 6 categories
ACCO leads 1 • LYTS leads 0 • NX leads 0 • APOG leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NX is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 3.1x LYTS's $592M. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NX's -13.0%. On growth, ACCO holds the edge at +8.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $592M | $1.8B | $1.4B | $1.6B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $51M | -$81M | $57M | $177M | $603M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $26M | -$240M | $54M | $74M | $306M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $38M | $95M | $95M | $49M | $247M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +25.3% | +26.1% | +22.7% | +30.7% | +40.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +6.5% | -10.0% | +6.7% | +7.9% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | -13.0% | +3.9% | +4.8% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | +5.1% | +6.8% | +3.2% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.5% | +2.3% | +1.6% | +8.3% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.1% | +71.9% | +6.1% | +2.4% | -1.9% |
Valuation Metrics
ACCO leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.2x trailing earnings, ACCO trades at a 70% valuation discount to LYTS's 31.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), APOG offers better value at 0.43x vs LYTS's 1.83x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $765M | $925M | $788M | $373M | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $828M | $1.7B | $1.0B | $1.2B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 31.09x | -3.73x | 14.54x | 9.18x | 22.85x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 22.46x | 10.09x | 10.66x | 4.64x | 19.47x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.83x | — | 0.43x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.12x | — | 21.98x | 6.79x | 16.90x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.33x | 0.50x | 0.56x | 0.24x | 4.26x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.28x | 1.29x | 1.54x | 0.57x | 7.83x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 22.07x | 9.05x | 8.28x | 7.34x | 28.05x |
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI delivers a 34.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $35 in annual profit, vs $-30 for NX. LYTS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ACCO's 1.39x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs NX's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +10.9% | -30.2% | +10.8% | +11.3% | +34.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +6.5% | -11.7% | +4.8% | +3.2% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.5% | -8.8% | +8.1% | +5.5% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +12.6% | -10.4% | +9.7% | +6.1% | +26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 | 7 | 7 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 1.18x | 0.56x | 1.39x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $63M | $778M | $247M | $856M | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3M | $76M | $40M | $64M | $113M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $67M | $854M | $286M | $921M | $532M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 13.52x | -3.30x | 5.97x | 2.50x | 13.31x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — LYTS and AWI each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYTS five years ago would be worth $32,769 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,073 for ACCO. Over the past 12 months, LYTS leads with a +53.9% total return vs APOG's -6.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 35.1% vs ACCO's -1.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.5% | +32.3% | -1.1% | +11.5% | -17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.9% | +18.6% | -6.7% | +16.7% | +7.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +101.1% | +6.9% | +0.1% | -4.8% | +146.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +227.7% | -23.4% | +11.1% | -39.3% | +57.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +109.6% | +24.7% | +10.6% | -35.3% | +322.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +26.2% | +2.3% | +0.0% | -1.6% | +35.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYTS and AWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AWI is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NX's 1.83 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYTS currently trades 99.2% from its 52-week high vs APOG's 73.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.40x | 1.83x | 1.25x | 1.35x | 0.81x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $24.75 | $22.98 | $49.99 | $4.29 | $206.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.31 | $11.04 | $30.75 | $2.81 | $149.06 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.2% | +88.1% | +73.3% | +94.2% | +78.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 70.7 | 54.2 | 54.3 | 74.9 | 39.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 375K | 454K | 252K | 1.2M | 482K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — APOG and ACCO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: LYTS as "Buy", NX as "Hold", APOG as "Hold", ACCO as "Hold", AWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 98.0% upside for ACCO (target: $8) vs 9.9% for LYTS (target: $27). For income investors, ACCO offers the higher dividend yield at 7.11% vs AWI's 0.78%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Hold | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $27.00 | — | $70.50 | $8.00 | $197.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 5 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.8% | +1.6% | +2.8% | +7.1% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 0 | 14 | 0 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.19 | $0.32 | $1.04 | $0.29 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.5% | +1.9% | +4.1% | +1.9% |
AWI leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ACCO leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
LYTS vs NX vs APOG vs ACCO vs AWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LYTS or NX or APOG or ACCO or AWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is the stronger pick with 43.
8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the better valuation at 9. 2x trailing P/E (4. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) a "Buy" — based on 5 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LYTS or NX or APOG or ACCO or AWI?
On trailing P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) is the cheapest at 9.
2x versus LSI Industries Inc. at 31. 1x. On forward P/E, ACCO Brands Corporation is actually cheaper at 4. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Apogee Enterprises, Inc. wins at 0. 32x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 32x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LYTS or NX or APOG or ACCO or AWI?
Over the past 5 years, LSI Industries Inc.
(LYTS) delivered a total return of +227. 7%, compared to -39. 3% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +322. 1% versus ACCO's -35. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LYTS or NX or APOG or ACCO or AWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus Quanex Building Products Corporation's 1. 83β — meaning NX is approximately 126% more volatile than AWI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, LSI Industries Inc. (LYTS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 139% for ACCO Brands Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LYTS or NX or APOG or ACCO or AWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) is pulling ahead at 43.
8% versus -8. 5% for ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACCO Brands Corporation grew EPS 141. 5% year-over-year, compared to -703. 3% for Quanex Building Products Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, NX leads at 14. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LYTS or NX or APOG or ACCO or AWI?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus -13. 6% for Quanex Building Products Corporation — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus -10. 6% for NX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AWI leads at 40. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LYTS or NX or APOG or ACCO or AWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Apogee Enterprises, Inc. (APOG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus LSI Industries Inc. 's 1. 32x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) trades at 4. 6x forward P/E versus 22. 5x for LSI Industries Inc. — 17. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACCO: 98. 0% to $8. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LYTS or NX or APOG or ACCO or AWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
ACCO Brands Corporation (ACCO) offers the highest yield at 7. 1%, versus 0. 8% for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI).
09Is LYTS or NX or APOG or ACCO or AWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 0. 8% yield, +322. 1% 10Y return). Quanex Building Products Corporation (NX) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +322. 1%, NX: +24. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LYTS and NX and APOG and ACCO and AWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (LYTS (Technology) and NX (Industrials) and APOG (Industrials) and ACCO (Industrials) and AWI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LYTS is a small-cap high-growth stock; NX is a small-cap high-growth stock; APOG is a small-cap deep-value stock; ACCO is a small-cap deep-value stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.