Entertainment
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
LYV vs IMAX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Entertainment
LYV vs IMAX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Entertainment | Entertainment |
| Market Cap | $38.65B | $1.92B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $25.61B | $405M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $84M | $43M |
| Gross Margin | 40.3% | 58.1% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 21.4% |
| Forward P/E | 115.8x | 21.1x |
| Total Debt | $12.44B | $297M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7.11B | $151M |
LYV vs IMAX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Live Nation Enterta… (LYV) | 100 | 338.3 | +238.3% |
| IMAX Corporation (IMAX) | 100 | 282.6 | +182.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LYV vs IMAX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
LYV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.80
- 6.2% 10Y total return vs IMAX's 8.9%
IMAX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 16.5%, EPS growth 31.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.9%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.43, Low D/E 69.5%, current ratio 1.67x
- Beta 0.43, current ratio 1.67x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 16.5% revenue growth vs LYV's 8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.1x vs 115.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 10.7% margin vs LYV's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.43 vs LYV's 0.80, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +38.9% vs LYV's +24.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.9% ROA vs LYV's 0.4%, ROIC 12.7% vs 19.7% |
LYV vs IMAX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
LYV vs IMAX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
IMAX leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LYV is the larger business by revenue, generating $25.6B annually — 63.3x IMAX's $405M. IMAX is the more profitable business, keeping 10.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LYV's 0.3%. On growth, LYV holds the edge at +12.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $25.6B | $405M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $1.6B | $150M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $84M | $43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.2B | $115M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +40.3% | +58.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +21.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +10.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +28.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.1% | -6.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.8% | +65.5% |
Valuation Metrics
IMAX leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, IMAX's 13.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LYV's 19.9x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $38.6B | $1.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $44.0B | $2.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -692.98x | 56.56x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 115.80x | 21.15x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.89x | 13.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.53x | 4.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 21.20x | 4.63x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 115.84x | 16.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IMAX leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IMAX delivers a 10.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $11 in annual profit, vs $4 for LYV. IMAX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.70x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LYV's 6.84x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), IMAX scores 7/9 vs LYV's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.4% | +10.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.4% | +4.9% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +19.7% | +12.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.4% | +14.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 6.84x | 0.70x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $5.3B | $146M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7.1B | $151M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.4B | $297M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.68x | 21.15x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LYV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LYV five years ago would be worth $20,800 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,034 for IMAX. Over the past 12 months, IMAX leads with a +38.9% total return vs LYV's +24.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LYV at 28.8% vs IMAX's 21.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +14.5% | -1.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.0% | +38.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +113.7% | +79.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +108.0% | +70.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +622.5% | +8.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.8% | +21.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LYV and IMAX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
IMAX is the less volatile stock with a 0.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than LYV's 0.80 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. LYV currently trades 94.9% from its 52-week high vs IMAX's 82.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.80x | 0.43x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $175.25 | $43.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $125.34 | $24.20 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.9% | +82.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 63.6 | 42.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.8M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates LYV as "Buy" and IMAX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 20.7% upside for IMAX (target: $43) vs 8.8% for LYV (target: $181).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $181.00 | $43.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 44 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.1% |
IMAX leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). LYV leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
LYV vs IMAX: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LYV or IMAX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is the stronger pick with 16.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV). IMAX Corporation (IMAX) offers the better valuation at 56. 6x trailing P/E (21. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV) a "Buy" — based on 44 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — LYV or IMAX?
On forward P/E, IMAX Corporation is actually cheaper at 21.
1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — LYV or IMAX?
Over the past 5 years, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) delivered a total return of +108. 0%, compared to +70. 3% for IMAX Corporation (IMAX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LYV returned +622. 5% versus IMAX's +8. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — LYV or IMAX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
43β versus Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. 's 0. 80β — meaning LYV is approximately 87% more volatile than IMAX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 70% versus 7% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — LYV or IMAX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is pulling ahead at 16.
5% versus 8. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. (LYV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: IMAX Corporation grew EPS 31. 3% year-over-year, compared to -108. 8% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LYV leads at 14. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — LYV or IMAX?
IMAX Corporation (IMAX) is the more profitable company, earning 8.
5% net margin versus 2. 0% for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IMAX leads at 23. 3% versus 5. 9% for LYV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IMAX leads at 57. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is LYV or IMAX more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, IMAX Corporation (IMAX) trades at 21.
1x forward P/E versus 115. 8x for Live Nation Entertainment, Inc. — 94. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for IMAX: 20. 7% to $43. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — LYV or IMAX?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is LYV or IMAX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Live Nation Entertainment, Inc.
(LYV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 80), +622. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LYV: +622. 5%, IMAX: +8. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between LYV and IMAX?
Both stocks operate in the Communication Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: LYV is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IMAX is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
- Sector: Communication Services
- Market Cap > $100B
- Revenue Growth > 6%
- Gross Margin > 24%
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.