LZMH
LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$948K
5Y Perf.-98.3%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
LZMH vs CNET vs CLPS vs RCON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
Advertising Agencies
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-51.8%
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$25M
5Y Perf.-22.4%
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$17M
5Y Perf.-56.8%
LZMH vs CNET vs CLPS vs RCON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | LZMH | CNET | CLPS | RCON |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Advertising Agencies | Information Technology Services | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Cap | $948K | $2M | $25M | $17M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $823M | $6M | $299M | $66M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $-2M | $-4M | $-43M |
| Gross Margin | 4.2% | 4.8% | 22.8% | 23.0% |
| Operating Margin | 0.4% | -31.7% | -1.4% | -86.5% |
| Forward P/E | 1.2x | — | — | — |
| Total Debt | $35M | $122K | $34M | $34M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | $812K | $28M | $99M |
LZMH vs CNET vs CLPS vs RCON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
LZMH
CNET
CLPS
RCON
| Stock | Feb 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| LZ Technology Holdi… (LZMH) | 100 | 1.7 | -98.3% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 48.2 | -51.8% |
| CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) | 100 | 77.6 | -22.4% |
| Recon Technology, L… (RCON) | 100 | 43.2 | -56.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: LZMH vs CNET vs CLPS vs RCON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LZMH and CLPS are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. CLPS Incorporation is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
LZMH
LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares
The Growth Play
LZMH carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 44.6%, EPS growth 188.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 116.5%
- 44.6% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
- 0.7% margin vs RCON's -64.3%
- 1.9% ROA vs CNET's -21.3%, ROIC 3.0% vs -64.7%
Best for: growth exposure
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
CNET plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: communication services exposure
CLPS
CLPS Incorporation
The Income Pick
CLPS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.27, yield 14.6%
- -78.5% 10Y total return vs CNET's -97.8%
- Beta 0.27, yield 14.6%, current ratio 1.58x
- Beta 0.27 vs CNET's 1.18
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
RCON
Recon Technology, Ltd.
The Defensive Pick
RCON is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.47, Low D/E 7.6%, current ratio 5.88x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LZMH | 44.6% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% |
| Quality / Margins | LZMH | 0.7% margin vs RCON's -64.3% |
| Stability / Safety | CLPS | Beta 0.27 vs CNET's 1.18 |
| Dividends | CLPS | 14.6% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CLPS | -5.4% vs LZMH's -99.1% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | LZMH | 1.9% ROA vs CNET's -21.3%, ROIC 3.0% vs -64.7% |
LZMH vs CNET vs CLPS vs RCON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2024
FY 2025
FY 2025
LZMH vs CNET vs CLPS vs RCON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLLZMHLAGGINGRCON
Who Leads Where
LZMH leads in 3 of 6 categories
CLPS leads 2 • CNET leads 0 • RCON leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓RCONRecon Technology, Ltd.
0leads
CNETZW Data Action Techno…
0leads
CLPSCLPS Incorporation
2leads
LZMHLZ Technology Holding…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs CLPSvs CNETMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
LZMH3/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
LZMH2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
LZMH6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CLPS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
CLPS1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LZMH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LZMH is the larger business by revenue, generating $823M annually — 133.4x CNET's $6M. LZMH is the more profitable business, keeping 0.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCON's -64.3%. On growth, CLPS holds the edge at +15.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | LZMHLZ Technology Hol… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $823M | $6M | $299M | $66M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | -$2M | -$1M | -$54M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | -$2M | -$4M | -$43M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | -$2M | $0 | -$44M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +4.8% | +22.8% | +23.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.4% | -31.7% | -1.4% | -86.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.7% | -33.4% | -1.3% | -64.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | -27.3% | -2.3% | -65.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | -47.0% | +15.3% | +2.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +95.7% | +75.8% | +35.7% |
LZMH leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
LZMH leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | LZMHLZ Technology Hol… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $947,541 | $2M | $25M | $17M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $6M | $1M | $31M | $7M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 1.16x | -0.38x | -3.48x | -1.22x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 3.04x | — | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.01x | 0.12x | 0.15x | 1.72x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.10x | 0.38x | 0.43x | 0.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 1.49x | — | — | — |
LZMH leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LZMH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LZMH delivers a 8.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. CNET carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CLPS's 0.59x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LZMH scores 6/9 vs CLPS's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | LZMHLZ Technology Hol… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.6% | -60.3% | -6.1% | -9.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | -21.3% | -3.2% | -8.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.0% | -64.7% | -7.9% | -10.6% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.4% | -73.5% | -9.8% | -11.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.52x | 0.03x | 0.59x | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $31M | -$690,000 | $6M | -$64M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | $812,000 | $28M | $99M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $35M | $122,000 | $34M | $34M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.75x | — | — | -372.30x |
LZMH leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CLPS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CLPS five years ago would be worth $3,073 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $55 for RCON. Over the past 12 months, CLPS leads with a -5.4% total return vs LZMH's -99.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CLPS at 0.2% vs LZMH's -73.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | LZMHLZ Technology Hol… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -93.2% | -44.4% | -10.3% | -45.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -99.1% | -55.1% | -5.4% | -49.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -89.0% | +0.5% | -88.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -97.9% | -69.3% | -99.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.1% | -97.8% | -78.5% | -99.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -73.3% | -52.1% | +0.2% | -51.6% |
CLPS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LZMH and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LZMH is the less volatile stock with a -0.99 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CNET's 1.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CLPS currently trades 48.2% from its 52-week high vs LZMH's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | LZMHLZ Technology Hol… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.93x | 1.30x | 0.19x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $32.10 | $2.78 | $1.88 | $7.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.09 | $0.57 | $0.80 | $0.75 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +0.3% | +25.2% | +48.2% | +11.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 19.3 | 50.7 | 49.8 | 42.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6.8M | 11K | 15K | 90K |
Evenly matched — LZMH and CLPS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
CLPS is the only dividend payer here at 14.60% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | LZMHLZ Technology Hol… | CNETZW Data Action Te… | CLPSCLPS Incorporation | RCONRecon Technology,… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +14.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 | 3 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.13 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
CLPS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
LZMH leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). CLPS leads in 2 (Total Returns, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
Best OverallLZ Technology Holdings Limi… (LZMH)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
LZMH vs CNET vs CLPS vs RCON: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is LZMH or CNET or CLPS or RCON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the stronger pick with 44.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) offers the better valuation at 1. 2x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — LZMH or CNET or CLPS or RCON?
Over the past 5 years, CLPS Incorporation (CLPS) delivered a total return of -69.
3%, compared to -99. 4% for Recon Technology, Ltd. (RCON). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CLPS returned -78. 6% versus RCON's -99. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — LZMH or CNET or CLPS or RCON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the lower-risk stock at -0.
93β versus ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. 's 1. 30β — meaning CNET is approximately -240% more volatile than LZMH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 59% for CLPS Incorporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — LZMH or CNET or CLPS or RCON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is pulling ahead at 44.
6% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares grew EPS 188. 9% year-over-year, compared to -181. 4% for CLPS Incorporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, LZMH leads at 116. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — LZMH or CNET or CLPS or RCON?
LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the more profitable company, earning 0.
7% net margin versus -64. 3% for Recon Technology, Ltd. — meaning it keeps 0. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: LZMH leads at 0. 4% versus -86. 5% for RCON. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCON leads at 23. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — LZMH or CNET or CLPS or RCON?
In this comparison, CLPS (14.
6% yield) pays a dividend. LZMH, CNET, RCON do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is LZMH or CNET or CLPS or RCON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LZ Technology Holdings Limited Class B Ordinary Shares (LZMH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.
93)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (LZMH: -98. 1%, CNET: -97. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between LZMH and CNET and CLPS and RCON?
These companies operate in different sectors (LZMH (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services) and CLPS (Technology) and RCON (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: LZMH is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock; CLPS is a small-cap high-growth stock; RCON is a small-cap quality compounder stock. CLPS pays a dividend while LZMH, CNET, RCON do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(LZMH: 44.6% · CNET: -47.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.