Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MAGH vs DV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Application
MAGH vs DV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Software - Application |
| Market Cap | $225M | $1.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15M | $764M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $43K | $55M |
| Gross Margin | 15.5% | 82.2% |
| Operating Margin | 0.5% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | 7161.1x | 20.5x |
| Total Debt | $2M | $100M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $760K | $259M |
Quick Verdict: MAGH vs DV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAGH is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 66.5% 10Y total return vs DV's -68.9%
- 0.3% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
- +66.5% vs DV's -19.9%
DV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 13.9%, EPS growth -6.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 18.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.03, Low D/E 8.8%, current ratio 4.27x
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 4.27x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.9% revenue growth vs MAGH's -36.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.5x vs 7161.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 7.2% margin vs MAGH's 0.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (8.8% vs 389.8%) | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; 3-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +66.5% vs DV's -19.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 4.2% ROA vs MAGH's 0.5%, ROIC 6.4% vs 2.7% |
MAGH vs DV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DV leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
DV is the larger business by revenue, generating $764M annually — 49.7x MAGH's $15M. DV is the more profitable business, keeping 7.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAGH's 0.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15M | $764M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $148M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $55M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $135M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +15.5% | +82.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.3% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -6.2% | +17.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +9.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +3.0% |
Valuation Metrics
DV leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 36.2x trailing earnings, DV trades at a 99% valuation discount to MAGH's 7161.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, DV's 11.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MAGH's 1840.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $225M | $1.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $227M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 7161.08x | 36.17x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 20.52x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.99x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 1840.75x | 11.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 18.66x | 2.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 501.65x | 1.60x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.18x |
Profitability & Efficiency
DV leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
DV delivers a 5.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $5 in annual profit, vs $3 for MAGH. DV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAGH's 3.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DV scores 5/9 vs MAGH's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.4% | +5.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.5% | +4.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.7% | +6.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.5% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 3.90x | 0.09x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2M | -$159M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $759,891 | $259M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2M | $100M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.78x | 43.16x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAGH leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAGH five years ago would be worth $16,650 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,979 for DV. Over the past 12 months, MAGH leads with a +66.5% total return vs DV's -19.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAGH at 18.5% vs DV's -26.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | 0.0% | -0.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +66.5% | -19.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | -60.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | -70.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +66.5% | -68.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +18.5% | -26.4% |
Risk & Volatility
MAGH leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MAGH is the less volatile stock with a -1.43 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DV's 1.03 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAGH currently trades 97.4% from its 52-week high vs DV's 64.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -1.43x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $6.94 | $16.82 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.99 | $7.64 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.4% | +64.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 92.2 | 61.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.6M | 2.6M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
MAGH is the only dividend payer here at 0.33% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $15.10 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +8.1% |
DV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). MAGH leads in 2 (Total Returns, Risk & Volatility).
MAGH vs DV: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAGH or DV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is the stronger pick with 13. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 5% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH). DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) offers the better valuation at 36. 2x trailing P/E (20. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAGH or DV?
On trailing P/E, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is the cheapest at 36. 2x versus Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares at 7161. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAGH or DV?
Over the past 5 years, Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) delivered a total return of +66.
5%, compared to -70. 2% for DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAGH returned +66. 5% versus DV's -68. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAGH or DV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
43β versus DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning DV is approximately -172% more volatile than MAGH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. (DV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 4% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAGH or DV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is pulling ahead at 13. 9% versus -36. 5% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc. grew EPS -6. 3% year-over-year, compared to -97. 9% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAGH or DV?
DoubleVerify Holdings, Inc.
(DV) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 8% net margin versus 0. 3% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 6. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: DV leads at 10. 6% versus 0. 5% for MAGH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — DV leads at 82. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — MAGH or DV?
In this comparison, MAGH (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. DV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is MAGH or DV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
43)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAGH: +66. 5%, DV: -68. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between MAGH and DV?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAGH (Industrials) and DV (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.