MAGH vs IAS

For growth investors, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.

(IAS) is the stronger pick with 11. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -36. 5% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH). Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) offers the better valuation at 45. 0x trailing P/E (27. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.

(IAS) is the cheapest at 45. 0x versus Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares at 7161. 1x.

Over the past 5 years, Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) delivered a total return of +66.

5%, compared to -49. 8% for Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAGH returned +66. 5% versus IAS's -49. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) is the lower-risk stock at -1.

43β versus Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. 's 0. 83β — meaning IAS is approximately -158% more volatile than MAGH relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. (IAS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 4% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.

(IAS) is pulling ahead at 11. 7% versus -36. 5% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Integral Ad Science Holding Corp. grew EPS 413. 4% year-over-year, compared to -97. 9% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Integral Ad Science Holding Corp.

(IAS) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 1% net margin versus 0. 3% for Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares — meaning it keeps 7. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IAS leads at 11. 4% versus 0. 5% for MAGH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — IAS leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

In this comparison, MAGH (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. IAS does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Magnitude International Ltd Ordinary Shares (MAGH) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.

43)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MAGH: +66. 5%, IAS: -49. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MAGH (Industrials) and IAS (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.