MAGN
Magnera Corp.
Manufacturing - Textiles
Market Cap$419M
5Y Perf.-94.1%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MAGN vs GPK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
GPK
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
Packaging & Containers
Market Cap$3.27B
5Y Perf.-23.7%
MAGN vs GPK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MAGN | GPK |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Textiles | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $419M | $3.27B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.29B | $8.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-133M | $274M |
| Gross Margin | 10.0% | 13.4% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 7.5% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 13.0x |
| Total Debt | $2.02B | $5.57B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $305M | $261M |
MAGN vs GPK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MAGN
GPK
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnera Corp. (MAGN) | 100 | 5.9 | -94.1% |
| Graphic Packaging H… (GPK) | 100 | 76.3 | -23.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAGN vs GPK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: GPK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Magnera Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MAGN
Magnera Corp.
The Growth Play
MAGN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 46.5%, EPS growth -1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.0%
- Beta 1.55, yield 100.0%, current ratio 2.37x
- 46.5% revenue growth vs GPK's -2.2%
Best for: growth exposure and defensive
GPK
Graphic Packaging Holding Company
The Income Pick
GPK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 0.88, yield 3.9%
- 12.8% 10Y total return vs MAGN's -82.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.88, current ratio 1.30x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MAGN | 46.5% revenue growth vs GPK's -2.2% |
| Value | GPK | Lower P/E (13.0x vs 14.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | GPK | 3.2% margin vs MAGN's -4.0% |
| Stability / Safety | GPK | Beta 0.88 vs MAGN's 1.55, lower leverage |
| Dividends | MAGN | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs GPK's 3.9% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MAGN | -5.2% vs GPK's -47.5% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | GPK | 2.3% ROA vs MAGN's -3.3%, ROIC 7.7% vs 2.1% |
MAGN vs GPK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2022
MAGN vs GPK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLGPKLAGGINGMAGN
MAGNMagnera Corp.
1leads
GPKGraphic Packaging Hol…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MAGNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
GPK4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MAGN3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
GPK6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
GPK4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GPK is the larger business by revenue, generating $8.7B annually — 2.6x MAGN's $3.3B. GPK is the more profitable business, keeping 3.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAGN's -4.0%. On growth, MAGN holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MAGNMagnera Corp. | GPKGraphic Packaging… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.3B | $8.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $299M | $1.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$133M | $274M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $293M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +13.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +7.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +3.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | +1.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.8% | -133.3% |
GPK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
MAGN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, GPK's 6.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than MAGN's 7.1x.
| Metric | MAGNMagnera Corp. | GPKGraphic Packaging… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $419M | $3.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $8.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.63x | 7.46x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.91x | 12.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.38x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.10x | 6.10x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.38x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 0.98x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.65x | — |
MAGN leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GPK delivers a 8.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $-12 for MAGN. GPK carries lower financial leverage with a 1.67x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAGN's 1.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAGN scores 6/9 vs GPK's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MAGNMagnera Corp. | GPKGraphic Packaging… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.3% | +8.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +7.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +9.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.89x | 1.67x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $5.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $305M | $261M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $5.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 5.47x |
GPK leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GPK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GPK five years ago would be worth $6,684 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,050 for MAGN. Over the past 12 months, MAGN leads with a -5.2% total return vs GPK's -47.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GPK at -22.0% vs MAGN's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MAGNMagnera Corp. | GPKGraphic Packaging… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.4% | -26.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.2% | -47.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.5% | -52.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | -33.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.3% | +12.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.6% | -22.0% |
GPK leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAGN and GPK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GPK is the less volatile stock with a 0.88 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAGN's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAGN currently trades 75.3% from its 52-week high vs GPK's 46.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MAGNMagnera Corp. | GPKGraphic Packaging… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 0.88x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.64 | $23.76 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.82 | $8.79 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.3% | +46.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 68.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 427K | 7.0M |
Evenly matched — MAGN and GPK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MAGN and GPK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MAGN as "Hold" and GPK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.6% upside for MAGN (target: $18) vs 14.1% for GPK (target: $13). For income investors, MAGN offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs GPK's 3.91%.
| Metric | MAGNMagnera Corp. | GPKGraphic Packaging… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $12.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +3.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 3 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $31.30 | $0.43 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +5.6% |
Evenly matched — MAGN and GPK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
GPK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallGraphic Packaging Holding C… (GPK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MAGN vs GPK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAGN or GPK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magnera Corp.
(MAGN) is the stronger pick with 46. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 2% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) offers the better valuation at 7. 5x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) a "Buy" — based on 27 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAGN or GPK?
On forward P/E, Graphic Packaging Holding Company is actually cheaper at 13.
0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAGN or GPK?
Over the past 5 years, Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) delivered a total return of -33.
2%, compared to -89. 5% for Magnera Corp. (MAGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GPK returned +12. 8% versus MAGN's -82. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAGN or GPK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
88β versus Magnera Corp. 's 1. 55β — meaning MAGN is approximately 76% more volatile than GPK relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 167% versus 189% for Magnera Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAGN or GPK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magnera Corp.
(MAGN) is pulling ahead at 46. 5% versus -2. 2% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Magnera Corp. grew EPS -1. 6% year-over-year, compared to -31. 5% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAGN leads at 29. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAGN or GPK?
Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
2% net margin versus -5. 0% for Magnera Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GPK leads at 10. 1% versus 2. 9% for MAGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GPK leads at 18. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAGN or GPK more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) trades at 13.
0x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for Magnera Corp. — 1. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAGN: 48. 6% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAGN or GPK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Magnera Corp. (MAGN) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 3. 9% for Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK).
09Is MAGN or GPK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Graphic Packaging Holding Company (GPK) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
88), 3. 9% yield). Magnera Corp. (MAGN) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GPK: +12. 8%, MAGN: -82. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAGN and GPK?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAGN (Industrials) and GPK (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MAGN is a small-cap high-growth stock; GPK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MAGN: 12.8% · GPK: 1.7%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.