Manufacturing - Textiles
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
MAGN vs SON
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Packaging & Containers
MAGN vs SON — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Textiles | Packaging & Containers |
| Market Cap | $419M | $5.10B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.29B | $7.49B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-133M | $1.04B |
| Gross Margin | 10.0% | 20.9% |
| Operating Margin | 2.9% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 15.3x | 8.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.02B | $4.85B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $305M | $378M |
MAGN vs SON — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Magnera Corp. (MAGN) | 100 | 6.0 | -94.0% |
| Sonoco Products Com… (SON) | 100 | 99.5 | -0.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAGN vs SON
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAGN is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 46.5%, EPS growth -1.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 29.0%
- Beta 1.55, yield 100.0%, current ratio 2.37x
- 46.5% revenue growth vs SON's 41.7%
SON carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 30 yrs, beta 0.53, yield 4.0%
- 48.6% 10Y total return vs MAGN's -82.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.53, current ratio 1.05x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 46.5% revenue growth vs SON's 41.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (8.9x vs 15.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 13.8% margin vs MAGN's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.53 vs MAGN's 1.55, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 100.0% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs SON's 4.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.9% vs MAGN's -5.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 9.0% ROA vs MAGN's -3.3%, ROIC 6.2% vs 2.1% |
MAGN vs SON — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MAGN vs SON — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SON leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SON is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.5B annually — 2.3x MAGN's $3.3B. SON is the more profitable business, keeping 13.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MAGN's -4.0%. On growth, MAGN holds the edge at +12.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.3B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $299M | $1.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$133M | $1.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $97M | $266M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +20.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -4.0% | +13.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +2.9% | +3.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.8% | -1.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +43.8% | +23.6% |
Valuation Metrics
MAGN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, MAGN's 7.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than SON's 7.8x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $419M | $5.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.1B | $9.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.63x | 12.99x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 15.29x | 8.86x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.10x | 7.77x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.13x | 0.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.39x | 1.42x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.65x | 12.99x |
Profitability & Efficiency
SON leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SON delivers a 30.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $30 in annual profit, vs $-12 for MAGN. SON carries lower financial leverage with a 1.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAGN's 1.89x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SON scores 7/9 vs MAGN's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -12.3% | +30.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -3.3% | +9.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.1% | +6.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.3% | +8.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.89x | 1.34x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $1.7B | $4.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $305M | $378M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.0B | $4.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.61x | 4.60x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
SON leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in SON five years ago would be worth $9,026 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,050 for MAGN. Over the past 12 months, SON leads with a +21.9% total return vs MAGN's -5.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SON at -1.1% vs MAGN's -36.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -17.4% | +17.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -5.2% | +21.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -74.5% | -3.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -89.5% | -9.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.3% | +48.6% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -36.6% | -1.1% |
Risk & Volatility
SON leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SON is the less volatile stock with a 0.53 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAGN's 1.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SON currently trades 88.5% from its 52-week high vs MAGN's 75.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.59x | 0.53x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.64 | $58.43 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.82 | $38.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +75.3% | +88.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.4 | 50.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 427K | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MAGN and SON each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MAGN as "Hold" and SON as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.6% upside for MAGN (target: $18) vs 14.1% for SON (target: $59). For income investors, MAGN offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs SON's 4.04%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $17.50 | $59.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 21 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +100.0% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 30 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $31.30 | $2.09 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.2% |
SON leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). MAGN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
MAGN vs SON: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAGN or SON a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Magnera Corp.
(MAGN) is the stronger pick with 46. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 41. 7% for Sonoco Products Company (SON). Sonoco Products Company (SON) offers the better valuation at 13. 0x trailing P/E (8. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Sonoco Products Company (SON) a "Buy" — based on 21 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAGN or SON?
On forward P/E, Sonoco Products Company is actually cheaper at 8.
9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAGN or SON?
Over the past 5 years, Sonoco Products Company (SON) delivered a total return of -9.
7%, compared to -89. 5% for Magnera Corp. (MAGN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SON returned +49. 4% versus MAGN's -82. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAGN or SON?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
53β versus Magnera Corp. 's 1. 59β — meaning MAGN is approximately 199% more volatile than SON relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Sonoco Products Company (SON) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 134% versus 189% for Magnera Corp. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAGN or SON?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Magnera Corp.
(MAGN) is pulling ahead at 46. 5% versus 41. 7% for Sonoco Products Company (SON). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Sonoco Products Company grew EPS 141. 2% year-over-year, compared to -1. 6% for Magnera Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAGN leads at 29. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAGN or SON?
Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the more profitable company, earning 5.
3% net margin versus -5. 0% for Magnera Corp. — meaning it keeps 5. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: SON leads at 9. 5% versus 2. 9% for MAGN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SON leads at 20. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAGN or SON more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Sonoco Products Company (SON) trades at 8.
9x forward P/E versus 15. 3x for Magnera Corp. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAGN: 48. 6% to $17. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAGN or SON?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Magnera Corp. (MAGN) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 4. 0% for Sonoco Products Company (SON).
09Is MAGN or SON better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Sonoco Products Company (SON) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
53), 4. 0% yield). Magnera Corp. (MAGN) carries a higher beta of 1. 59 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (SON: +49. 4%, MAGN: -82. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAGN and SON?
These companies operate in different sectors (MAGN (Industrials) and SON (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.