Compare Stocks

4 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

MAIA vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ACAD

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
MAIA
MAIA Biotechnology, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareAMEX • US
Market Cap$55M
5Y Perf.-74.1%
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$6.40B
5Y Perf.+693.0%
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNYSE • US
Market Cap$2.40B
5Y Perf.-7.1%
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Biotechnology

HealthcareNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$3.67B
5Y Perf.+47.9%

MAIA vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ACAD — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
MAIA logoMAIA
IMVT logoIMVT
RCUS logoRCUS
ACAD logoACAD
IndustryBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnologyBiotechnology
Market Cap$55M$6.40B$2.40B$3.67B
Revenue (TTM)$0.00$0.00$236M$1.10B
Net Income (TTM)$-24M$-506M$-369M$376M
Gross Margin90.7%91.5%
Operating Margin-168.6%7.4%
Forward P/E55.8x
Total Debt$0.00$72K$99M$52M
Cash & Equiv.$8.66B$902M$222M$178M

MAIA vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ACADLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

MAIA
IMVT
RCUS
ACAD
StockJul 22Jun 26Return
MAIA Biotechnology,… (MAIA)10025.9-74.1%
Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT)100793.0+693.0%
Arcus Biosciences, … (RCUS)10092.9-7.1%
ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD)100147.9+47.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: MAIA vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ACAD

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: ACAD leads in 4 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Arcus Biosciences, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
MAIA
MAIA Biotechnology, Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick

MAIA plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.

Best for: healthcare exposure
IMVT
Immunovant, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

IMVT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 213.1% 10Y total return vs RCUS's 40.4%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.65, Low D/E 0.0%, current ratio 9.09x
  • Beta 1.65, current ratio 9.09x
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
RCUS
Arcus Biosciences, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

RCUS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +137.9% vs MAIA's -18.3%
Best for: momentum
ACAD
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
The Income Pick

ACAD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • beta 1.20
  • Rev growth 11.9%, EPS growth 68.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 27.5%
  • 11.9% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
  • 34.3% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthACAD logoACAD11.9% revenue growth vs IMVT's -22.2%
Quality / MarginsACAD logoACAD34.3% margin vs RCUS's -156.4%
Stability / SafetyACAD logoACADBeta 1.20 vs RCUS's 1.98, lower leverage
DividendsTieNone of these 4 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)RCUS logoRCUS+137.9% vs MAIA's -18.3%
Efficiency (ROA)ACAD logoACAD26.2% ROA vs IMVT's -62.2%

MAIA vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ACAD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

MAIAMAIA Biotechnology, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

IMVTImmunovant, Inc.

Segment breakdown not available.

RCUSArcus Biosciences, Inc.
FY 2025
License And Development Services
87.4%$221M
Development Services
6.7%$17M
R&D Services
3.2%$8M
License
2.8%$7M
ACADACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
FY 2018
Product
100.0%$224M

MAIA vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ACAD — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLACADLAGGINGRCUS

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

ACAD and IMVT operate at a comparable scale, with $1.1B and $0 in trailing revenue. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to RCUS's -156.4%. On growth, ACAD holds the edge at +9.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricMAIA logoMAIAMAIA Biotechnolog…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$0$0$236M$1.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$16M-$532M-$391M$96M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$24M-$506M-$369M$376M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$20M-$407M-$489M$212M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+90.7%+91.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-168.6%+7.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-156.4%+34.3%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-2.1%+19.4%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-39.3%+9.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+12.5%-14.1%+10.5%-81.8%
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

ACAD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
MetricMAIA logoMAIAMAIA Biotechnolog…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Market CapShares × price$55M$6.4B$2.4B$3.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash-$8.6B$5.5B$2.3B$3.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-2.04x-11.25x-7.25x9.36x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.55.82x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple25.51x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue9.72x3.42x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share19.33x6.66x4.06x2.99x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF34.90x
ACAD leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-69 for RCUS. IMVT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to RCUS's 0.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), ACAD scores 6/9 vs RCUS's 0/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricMAIA logoMAIAMAIA Biotechnolog…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-4.0%-68.2%-69.0%+35.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.0%-62.2%-35.3%+26.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-64.1%+10.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-4.8%-68.3%-42.1%+10.1%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–92206
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.00x0.16x0.04x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$8.7B-$902M-$123M-$126M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$8.7B$902M$222M$178M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$0$72,000$99M$52M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-13.38x
ACAD leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

IMVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in IMVT five years ago would be worth $29,031 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,206 for MAIA. Over the past 12 months, RCUS leads with a +137.9% total return vs MAIA's -18.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IMVT at 14.1% vs MAIA's -15.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricMAIA logoMAIAMAIA Biotechnolog…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-10.6%+20.2%+2.4%-18.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-18.3%+101.7%+137.9%-2.5%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-39.1%+48.5%+16.2%-10.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.9%+190.3%-3.8%-8.1%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-67.9%+213.1%+40.4%-40.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-15.3%+14.1%+5.1%-3.7%
IMVT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — IMVT and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

ACAD is the less volatile stock with a 1.20 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RCUS's 1.98 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. IMVT currently trades 85.9% from its 52-week high vs MAIA's 44.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricMAIA logoMAIAMAIA Biotechnolog…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.71x1.65x1.98x1.20x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$3.19$36.27$28.72$27.81
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.87$14.32$7.91$19.69
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+44.8%+85.9%+83.1%+77.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10052.452.350.842.6
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded737K1.9M1.0M1.5M
Evenly matched — IMVT and ACAD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.

Analyst consensus: IMVT as "Buy", RCUS as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 62.3% upside for ACAD (target: $35) vs 30.6% for RCUS (target: $31).

MetricMAIA logoMAIAMAIA Biotechnolog…IMVT logoIMVTImmunovant, Inc.RCUS logoRCUSArcus Biosciences…ACAD logoACADACADIA Pharmaceut…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$43.67$31.17$34.78
# AnalystsCovering analysts231837
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway

ACAD leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). IMVT leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.

Best OverallACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

MAIA vs IMVT vs RCUS vs ACAD: Key Questions Answered

9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is MAIA or IMVT or RCUS or ACAD a better buy right now?

For growth investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the stronger pick with 11. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. (ACAD) offers the better valuation at 9. 4x trailing P/E (55. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which is the better long-term investment — MAIA or IMVT or RCUS or ACAD?

Over the past 5 years, Immunovant, Inc.

(IMVT) delivered a total return of +190. 3%, compared to -67. 9% for MAIA Biotechnology, Inc. (MAIA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IMVT returned +228. 3% versus MAIA's -66. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

03

Which is safer — MAIA or IMVT or RCUS or ACAD?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 20β versus Arcus Biosciences, Inc. 's 1. 98β — meaning RCUS is approximately 66% more volatile than ACAD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Immunovant, Inc. (IMVT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 16% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

04

Which is growing faster — MAIA or IMVT or RCUS or ACAD?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is pulling ahead at 11. 9% versus -4. 3% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. grew EPS 68. 4% year-over-year, compared to -4. 8% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RCUS leads at 30. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

05

Which has better profit margins — MAIA or IMVT or RCUS or ACAD?

ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 5% net margin versus -142. 9% for Arcus Biosciences, Inc. — meaning it keeps 36. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: ACAD leads at 9. 8% versus -156. 3% for RCUS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RCUS leads at 96. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

06

Is MAIA or IMVT or RCUS or ACAD more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ACAD: 62.

3% to $34. 78.

07

Which pays a better dividend — MAIA or IMVT or RCUS or ACAD?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

08

Is MAIA or IMVT or RCUS or ACAD better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.

(ACAD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 20)). Arcus Biosciences, Inc. (RCUS) carries a higher beta of 1. 98 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ACAD: -46. 6%, RCUS: +45. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

09

What are the main differences between MAIA and IMVT and RCUS and ACAD?

Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: MAIA is a small-cap quality compounder stock; IMVT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RCUS is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

MAIA

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

IMVT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

RCUS

Quality Business

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 54%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

ACAD

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Healthcare
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 20%
Run This Screen

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.