Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAMA vs WMT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
MAMA vs WMT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Discount Stores |
| Market Cap | $607M | $964.49B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $725.30B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $23.06B |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 25.0% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 4.2% |
| Forward P/E | 139.7x | 41.7x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $67.09B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $10.73B |
MAMA vs WMT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mama's Creations, I… (MAMA) | 100 | 536.3 | +436.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 254.6 | +154.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAMA vs WMT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAMA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 39.2%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs WMT's 447.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 27.5%, current ratio 2.17x
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 52 yrs, beta -0.00, yield 0.8%
- Lower P/E (41.7x vs 139.7x), PEG 3.79 vs 86.59
- 0.8% yield; 52-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.2% revenue growth vs WMT's 4.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (41.7x vs 139.7x), PEG 3.79 vs 86.59 | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs WMT's 3.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Lower D/E ratio (27.5% vs 63.2%) | |
| Dividends | 0.8% yield; 52-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.3% vs WMT's +28.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs MAMA's 7.9%, ROIC 14.4% vs 16.8% |
MAMA vs WMT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MAMA vs WMT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAMA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 3833.0x MAMA's $189M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.2% (MAMA) to 3.2% (WMT). On growth, MAMA holds the edge at +49.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $725.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $41.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $23.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $12.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +25.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +4.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +3.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +1.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.7% | +7.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.3% | +19.6% |
Valuation Metrics
WMT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 44.3x trailing earnings, WMT trades at a 61% valuation discount to MAMA's 114.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), WMT offers better value at 4.03x vs MAMA's 71.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $607M | $964.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $601M | $1.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 114.69x | 44.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 139.74x | 41.66x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 71.07x | 4.03x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.90x | 23.19x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.53x | 1.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.73x | 9.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 62.14x | 64.63x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAMA leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
WMT delivers a 22.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $13 for MAMA. MAMA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to WMT's 0.63x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +22.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | +8.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.8% | +14.4% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.7% | +17.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.63x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $56.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $10.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $67.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.57x | 11.70x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAMA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAMA five years ago would be worth $61,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26,710 for WMT. Over the past 12 months, MAMA leads with a +87.3% total return vs WMT's +28.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAMA at 76.8% vs WMT's 34.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +7.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.3% | +28.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +452.2% | +140.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | +167.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | +447.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +76.8% | +34.0% |
Risk & Volatility
WMT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WMT is the less volatile stock with a -0.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAMA's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs MAMA's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | -0.00x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.85 | $135.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.75 | $93.43 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +89.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 45.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 427K | 18.3M |
Analyst Outlook
WMT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates MAMA as "Buy" and WMT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for MAMA (target: $23) vs 15.2% for WMT (target: $139). WMT is the only dividend payer here at 0.77% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $139.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 66 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 52 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
MAMA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). WMT leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
MAMA vs WMT: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAMA or WMT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is the stronger pick with 39. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). Walmart Inc. (WMT) offers the better valuation at 44. 3x trailing P/E (41. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAMA or WMT?
On trailing P/E, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the cheapest at 44. 3x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. at 114. 7x. On forward P/E, Walmart Inc. is actually cheaper at 41. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Walmart Inc. wins at 3. 79x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAMA or WMT?
Over the past 5 years, Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) delivered a total return of +518. 7%, compared to +167. 1% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAMA returned +518. 7% versus WMT's +447. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAMA or WMT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 00β versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning MAMA is approximately -18583% more volatile than WMT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 63% for Walmart Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAMA or WMT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is pulling ahead at 39. 2% versus 4. 7% for Walmart Inc. (WMT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mama's Creations, Inc. grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to 13. 3% for Walmart Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAMA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAMA or WMT?
Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus 3. 1% for Walmart Inc. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAMA leads at 4. 9% versus 4. 2% for WMT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAMA leads at 25. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAMA or WMT more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Walmart Inc. (WMT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 79x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Walmart Inc. (WMT) trades at 41. 7x forward P/E versus 139. 7x for Mama's Creations, Inc. — 98. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAMA: 54. 3% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAMA or WMT?
In this comparison, WMT (0.
8% yield) pays a dividend. MAMA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAMA or WMT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Walmart Inc.
(WMT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 00), 0. 8% yield, +447. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WMT: +447. 2%, MAMA: +518. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAMA and WMT?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MAMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock. WMT pays a dividend while MAMA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.