Packaged Foods
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
MAMA vs WMT vs KR vs SYY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Discount Stores
Grocery Stores
Food Distribution
MAMA vs WMT vs KR vs SYY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Packaged Foods | Discount Stores | Grocery Stores | Food Distribution |
| Market Cap | $607M | $964.49B | $40.95B | $37.93B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $189M | $725.30B | $147.64B | $83.57B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $23.06B | $1.02B | $1.74B |
| Gross Margin | 24.5% | 25.0% | 22.3% | 18.5% |
| Operating Margin | 4.3% | 4.2% | 1.3% | 3.6% |
| Forward P/E | 139.7x | 41.7x | 12.4x | 17.3x |
| Total Debt | $14M | $67.09B | $24.68B | $14.49B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $20M | $10.73B | $3.33B | $1.07B |
MAMA vs WMT vs KR vs SYY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 21 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mama's Creations, I… (MAMA) | 100 | 536.3 | +436.3% |
| Walmart Inc. (WMT) | 100 | 254.6 | +154.6% |
| The Kroger Co. (KR) | 100 | 159.0 | +59.0% |
| Sysco Corporation (SYY) | 100 | 106.7 | +6.7% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MAMA vs WMT vs KR vs SYY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
MAMA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 39.2%, EPS growth 38.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 22.6%
- 5.2% 10Y total return vs WMT's 447.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, Low D/E 27.5%, current ratio 2.17x
- 39.2% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4%
WMT is the clearest fit if your priority is efficiency.
- 8.1% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 14.4% vs 5.0%
KR is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (12.4x vs 41.7x)
SYY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 10 yrs, beta 0.31, yield 2.6%
- PEG 0.32 vs WMT's 3.79
- Beta 0.31, yield 2.6%, current ratio 1.21x
- Beta 0.31 vs MAMA's 0.74
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 39.2% revenue growth vs KR's 0.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.4x vs 41.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.2% margin vs KR's 0.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs MAMA's 0.74 | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 10-year raise streak, vs WMT's 0.8%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +87.3% vs KR's +1.6% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 8.1% ROA vs KR's 2.0%, ROIC 14.4% vs 5.0% |
MAMA vs WMT vs KR vs SYY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
MAMA vs WMT vs KR vs SYY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
MAMA leads in 3 of 6 categories
KR leads 1 • WMT leads 0 • SYY leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MAMA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WMT is the larger business by revenue, generating $725.3B annually — 3833.0x MAMA's $189M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 3.2% (MAMA) to 0.7% (KR). On growth, MAMA holds the edge at +49.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $189M | $725.3B | $147.6B | $83.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $14M | $41.4B | $5.5B | $4.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $23.1B | $1.0B | $1.7B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $9M | $12.6B | $3.5B | $2.0B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +24.5% | +25.0% | +22.3% | +18.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.3% | +4.2% | +1.3% | +3.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.2% | +3.2% | +0.7% | +2.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.8% | +1.7% | +2.4% | +2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +49.7% | +7.3% | +1.2% | +4.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +51.3% | +19.6% | +50.0% | -13.4% |
Valuation Metrics
KR leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.2x trailing earnings, SYY trades at a 81% valuation discount to MAMA's 114.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), SYY offers better value at 0.39x vs MAMA's 71.07x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $607M | $964.5B | $41.0B | $37.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $601M | $1.02T | $62.3B | $51.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 114.69x | 44.32x | 42.02x | 21.23x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 139.74x | 41.66x | 12.35x | 17.27x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 71.07x | 4.03x | — | 0.39x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 40.90x | 23.19x | 10.72x | 12.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.53x | 1.35x | 0.28x | 0.47x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 11.73x | 9.14x | 7.14x | 20.89x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 62.14x | 64.63x | 12.22x | 21.30x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MAMA leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
SYY delivers a 80.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $81 in annual profit, vs $13 for KR. MAMA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SYY's 7.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MAMA scores 6/9 vs SYY's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +13.0% | +22.7% | +13.0% | +80.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +7.9% | +8.1% | +2.0% | +6.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +16.8% | +14.4% | +5.0% | +15.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.7% | +17.5% | +5.5% | +19.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.27x | 0.63x | 4.16x | 7.81x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$5M | $56.4B | $21.3B | $13.4B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $20M | $10.7B | $3.3B | $1.1B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14M | $67.1B | $24.7B | $14.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 16.57x | 11.70x | 2.59x | 4.35x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MAMA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MAMA five years ago would be worth $61,867 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $11,238 for SYY. Over the past 12 months, MAMA leads with a +87.3% total return vs KR's +1.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MAMA at 76.8% vs SYY's 5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +15.3% | +7.7% | +3.9% | +10.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +87.3% | +28.6% | +1.6% | +7.9% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +452.2% | +140.7% | +47.8% | +18.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | +167.1% | +83.4% | +12.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +518.7% | +447.2% | +102.9% | +100.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +76.8% | +34.0% | +13.9% | +5.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — WMT and KR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KR is the less volatile stock with a -0.67 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MAMA's 0.74 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WMT currently trades 89.5% from its 52-week high vs MAMA's 83.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | -0.00x | -0.67x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $17.85 | $135.16 | $76.58 | $91.69 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.75 | $93.43 | $58.60 | $68.19 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +83.5% | +89.5% | +84.5% | +86.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 52.6 | 45.9 | 46.9 | 66.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 427K | 18.3M | 5.2M | 3.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — WMT and SYY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: MAMA as "Buy", WMT as "Buy", KR as "Buy", SYY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 54.3% upside for MAMA (target: $23) vs 14.2% for SYY (target: $90). For income investors, SYY offers the higher dividend yield at 2.58% vs WMT's 0.77%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $23.00 | $139.44 | $74.25 | $90.44 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 66 | 44 | 30 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.8% | +2.1% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 52 | 19 | 10 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.94 | $1.35 | $2.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% | +6.6% | +3.3% |
MAMA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). KR leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
MAMA vs WMT vs KR vs SYY: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MAMA or WMT or KR or SYY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is the stronger pick with 39. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). Sysco Corporation (SYY) offers the better valuation at 21. 2x trailing P/E (17. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — MAMA or WMT or KR or SYY?
On trailing P/E, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the cheapest at 21.
2x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. at 114. 7x. On forward P/E, The Kroger Co. is actually cheaper at 12. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Sysco Corporation wins at 0. 32x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — MAMA or WMT or KR or SYY?
Over the past 5 years, Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) delivered a total return of +518. 7%, compared to +12. 4% for Sysco Corporation (SYY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MAMA returned +518. 7% versus SYY's +100. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — MAMA or WMT or KR or SYY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 67β versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 0. 74β — meaning MAMA is approximately -210% more volatile than KR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Mama's Creations, Inc. (MAMA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 8% for Sysco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — MAMA or WMT or KR or SYY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is pulling ahead at 39. 2% versus 0. 4% for The Kroger Co. (KR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Mama's Creations, Inc. grew EPS 38. 2% year-over-year, compared to -58. 0% for The Kroger Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, MAMA leads at 22. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — MAMA or WMT or KR or SYY?
Mama's Creations, Inc.
(MAMA) is the more profitable company, earning 3. 1% net margin versus 0. 7% for The Kroger Co. — meaning it keeps 3. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MAMA leads at 4. 9% versus 1. 3% for KR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MAMA leads at 25. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is MAMA or WMT or KR or SYY more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Sysco Corporation (SYY) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 32x versus Mama's Creations, Inc. 's 86. 59x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, The Kroger Co. (KR) trades at 12. 4x forward P/E versus 139. 7x for Mama's Creations, Inc. — 127. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MAMA: 54. 3% to $23. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — MAMA or WMT or KR or SYY?
In this comparison, SYY (2.
6% yield), KR (2. 1% yield), WMT (0. 8% yield) pay a dividend. MAMA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is MAMA or WMT or KR or SYY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, The Kroger Co.
(KR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 67), 2. 1% yield, +102. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (KR: +102. 9%, MAMA: +518. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between MAMA and WMT and KR and SYY?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: MAMA is a small-cap high-growth stock; WMT is a large-cap quality compounder stock; KR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SYY is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. WMT, KR, SYY pay a dividend while MAMA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.