MANH vs VEEV

For growth investors, Veeva Systems Inc.

(VEEV) is the stronger pick with 16. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) offers the better valuation at 30. 8x trailing P/E (18. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Veeva Systems Inc.

(VEEV) is the cheapest at 30. 8x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. at 38. 3x. On forward P/E, Veeva Systems Inc. is actually cheaper at 18. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Veeva Systems Inc. wins at 1. 04x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 20x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Manhattan Associates, Inc.

(MANH) delivered a total return of +4. 3%, compared to -35. 2% for Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: VEEV returned +519. 6% versus MANH's +135. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Veeva Systems Inc.

(VEEV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 77β versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning MANH is approximately 42% more volatile than VEEV relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 36% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Veeva Systems Inc.

(VEEV) is pulling ahead at 16. 3% versus 3. 7% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. (MANH). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Veeva Systems Inc. grew EPS 25. 9% year-over-year, compared to 2. 6% for Manhattan Associates, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VEEV leads at 14. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Veeva Systems Inc.

(VEEV) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 4% net margin versus 20. 3% for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: VEEV leads at 28. 7% versus 26. 1% for MANH. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — VEEV leads at 75. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 04x versus Manhattan Associates, Inc. 's 1. 20x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, Veeva Systems Inc. (VEEV) trades at 18. 9x forward P/E versus 25. 7x for Manhattan Associates, Inc. — 6. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VEEV: 67. 4% to $280. 10.

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Veeva Systems Inc.

(VEEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 77), +519. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (VEEV: +519. 6%, MANH: +135. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (MANH (Technology) and VEEV (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: MANH is a small-cap quality compounder stock; VEEV is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.