MASK
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares
Information Technology Services
Market Cap$56M
5Y Perf.-96.5%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
MASK vs CNET
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
Advertising Agencies
Market Cap$2M
5Y Perf.-58.8%
MASK vs CNET — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | MASK | CNET |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Advertising Agencies |
| Market Cap | $56M | $2M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $7M | $6M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $3M | $-2M |
| Gross Margin | 60.0% | 4.8% |
| Operating Margin | 47.9% | -31.7% |
| Forward P/E | 17.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $402K | $122K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $52K | $812K |
MASK vs CNET — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
MASK
CNET
| Stock | Jan 25 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3 E Network Technol… (MASK) | 100 | 3.5 | -96.5% |
| ZW Data Action Tech… (CNET) | 100 | 41.2 | -58.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: MASK vs CNET
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MASK leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and recent price momentum and sentiment. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
MASK
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares
The Growth Play
MASK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 173.0%, EPS growth 57.5%
- 173.0% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5%
- 41.0% margin vs CNET's -33.4%
Best for: growth exposure
CNET
ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
The Income Pick
CNET is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.18
- -97.8% 10Y total return vs MASK's -98.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.18, Low D/E 3.3%, current ratio 1.57x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | MASK | 173.0% revenue growth vs CNET's -49.5% |
| Quality / Margins | MASK | 41.0% margin vs CNET's -33.4% |
| Stability / Safety | CNET | Beta 1.18 vs MASK's 3.18, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | CNET | -55.1% vs MASK's -96.9% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | MASK | 54.0% ROA vs CNET's -21.3%, ROIC 56.8% vs -64.7% |
MASK vs CNET — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2024
MASK vs CNET — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLCNETLAGGINGMASK
MASK3 E Network Technolog…
2leads
CNETZW Data Action Techno…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs MASKMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MASK5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
CNET3/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MASK5/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
CNET6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
CNET2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MASK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MASK and CNET operate at a comparable scale, with $7M and $6M in trailing revenue. MASK is the more profitable business, keeping 41.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to CNET's -33.4%. On growth, MASK holds the edge at +5.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | MASK3 E Network Techn… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $7M | $6M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $3M | -$2M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$2M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +60.0% | +4.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +47.9% | -31.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +41.0% | -33.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.1% | -27.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.3% | -47.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +56.3% | +95.7% |
MASK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
CNET leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | MASK3 E Network Techn… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $56M | $2M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $56M | $1M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.71x | -0.38x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 30.86x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.30x | 0.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 10.20x | 0.38x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 60.38x | — |
CNET leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MASK leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MASK delivers a 76.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $76 in annual profit, vs $-60 for CNET. CNET carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MASK's 0.15x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MASK scores 6/9 vs CNET's 5/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | MASK3 E Network Techn… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +76.4% | -60.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +54.0% | -21.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +56.8% | -64.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +74.6% | -73.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $350,393 | -$690,000 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $51,809 | $812,000 |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $402,202 | $122,000 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
MASK leads this category, winning 5 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CNET leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CNET five years ago would be worth $206 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $198 for MASK. Over the past 12 months, CNET leads with a -55.1% total return vs MASK's -96.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CNET at -52.1% vs MASK's -72.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | MASK3 E Network Techn… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -60.6% | -44.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -96.9% | -55.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | -89.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | -97.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.0% | -97.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -72.9% | -52.1% |
CNET leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
CNET is the less volatile stock with a 1.18 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MASK's 3.18 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. CNET currently trades 25.2% from its 52-week high vs MASK's 2.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | MASK3 E Network Techn… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.18x | 1.18x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $95.75 | $2.78 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.26 | $0.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.6% | +25.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.2 | 50.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.6M | 11K |
CNET leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | MASK3 E Network Techn… | CNETZW Data Action Te… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
CNET leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). MASK leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency).
Best OverallZW Data Action Technologies… (CNET)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
MASK vs CNET: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is MASK or CNET a better buy right now?
For growth investors, 3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (MASK) is the stronger pick with 173.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). 3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (MASK) offers the better valuation at 17. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — MASK or CNET?
Over the past 5 years, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) delivered a total return of -97. 9%, compared to -98. 0% for 3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (MASK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CNET returned -97. 8% versus MASK's -98. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — MASK or CNET?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 18β versus 3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares's 3. 18β — meaning MASK is approximately 170% more volatile than CNET relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 15% for 3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — MASK or CNET?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), 3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (MASK) is pulling ahead at 173.
0% versus -49. 5% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. (CNET). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: 3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 57. 5% year-over-year, compared to -124. 1% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — MASK or CNET?
3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (MASK) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
9% net margin versus -24. 4% for ZW Data Action Technologies Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MASK leads at 40. 0% versus -24. 3% for CNET. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MASK leads at 50. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — MASK or CNET?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is MASK or CNET better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, ZW Data Action Technologies Inc.
(CNET) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 18)). 3 E Network Technology Group Ltd Class A Ordinary Shares (MASK) carries a higher beta of 3. 18 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (CNET: -97. 8%, MASK: -98. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between MASK and CNET?
These companies operate in different sectors (MASK (Technology) and CNET (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: MASK is a small-cap high-growth stock; CNET is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(MASK: 5.3% · CNET: -47.0%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.